Read 1995 - The UnDutchables Online
Authors: Colin White,Laurie Boucke
This cause will warrant demonstrations, riots and, most important of all, collections. Donations will inevitably be void of taxation.
The logic behind the attitude is described in promotional material from an Gtrecht
aktie
group:
Actions, in which and through which, people are offered the opportunity to take action themselves
.
Any legal resident of Holland may hold a demonstration. It is a democratic right. Whether it is supported by five or 50,000, it is allowed to take place. Demonstrations must be well organized and co-ordinated with the local authorities. Every town or city has its own rules for this activity. Specifically, you must inform the local police of the intended date, time and especially the GOAL of the event, after which you will be advised of any necessary modifications to:
When all is agreed, you will receive your demonstration permit and the necessary preparations can be made for the day. During the demonstration, you will naturally notice increased police presence. Do not be dismayed. They are individuals first and policemen second. Some will even gladly display your campaign button on their uniform. If so requested, police car(s) will follow your demonstration along its defined route to ensure your cause is heard and not disrupted.
Non-approved demonstrations are not permitted, but are often allowed if they are orderly and do not disturb traffic—and depending on the appearance of the protesters and the general acceptance of the goal. Police support during the proceedings is limited.
It must be emphasized that many of the causes have the good of the nation, minorities, the oppressed or all of (wo) mankind in mind. Whatever the subject matter, they are an ongoing example of democracy in progress. What appears to be a Dutch addiction to this process strikes visitors to the country as rather curious. Perhaps these passionate demonstrations and debates account in part for the relatively low level of violence in an increasingly violent era.
Demonstrating and protesting first became popular and fashionable following World War II. Many 60+ers do not appreciate such activities. As one overseas correspondent writes,
’The Dutch Way’This type of thing is not dignified and not in line with the traditional sobriety of the Dutch. It is more a recent phenomenon which may well disappear as time goes by. I personally hope so, as I would hate this trend to become a Dutch characteristic
.
The most successful of Dutch causes are elevated to the rank of ‘The Dutch Way,’ which is an adulation bestowed upon those principles and prejudices that command the support of 250% of the population. In this respect, the housing rights issue of the 1970’s and 1980’s commands the prime example. Long-suffering parents were anxious for their post-pubic offspring to vacate the nest while the
enfants terribles
themselves could not wait to feather their own nests. But there are few empty homes.
A typically Dutch answer to this situation was to form pressure groups known to the outside world as
krakers
. The
krakers
, who enjoyed their heyday in the 1980’s, fanatically opposed the acquisition of empty buildings for speculation—all reasonable and uninhabited space should be translated into subsidized housing for them. This is ‘ The Dutch Way.’
Krakers
invaded vacant places: office blocks, individual flats, shops, warehouses or any other construction that was vacant for more than a few days. The
kraker
-cause came to a head during violent riots in Amsterdam. The police were forced to call in the army which brought in a tank to move the crowd. The confrontation ended only when the city agreed to renovate the occupied building for the squatters. ‘
We have the squatters under control now
…’ A city housing official summed it up by stating that the job would cost more than a million guilders, ‘…
an expensive way to deal with a little social unrest. But it’s The Dutch Way
.’
The
krakers
have since dropped from the limelight, their particular cause appearing old-fashioned to the masses. A 1991 attempt to revive public support by invading a small island was met with little more than a sarcastic smirk by the general populace and a request from the
Rijkswaterstaat
to ‘kindly vacate the premises.’
No doubt partially due to the support and success of the
krakers
’ tactics in Amsterdam, RaRa (
de Revolutionaire Anti Racistische Actie
) exploded terrorist bombs at the Amsterdam home of the Secretary of State and at the Palace of Justice in The Hague in 1991. The cause in question was a series of governmental proposals on reforming political asylum and its abuse. Public reaction was one of outrage and horror, giving hope to all that this kind of senseless anti-Dutch activity will NOT become The NEW Dutch Way.
Women’s liberation is probably the most extreme example of the ‘National Passion’ that readily demonstrates (sorry, exemplifies) itself. And no wonder. The Dutch Government willingly provides 12-13 million guilders annually for feminists to do ‘research.’ The modern Dutch
Vrouwen
(women) are so fanatical about their genetic characteristics that they elevate femininity to the highest pinnacle possible. They are WOMEN—and people, humans, etc., secondly.
Vrouwen
have their own
cafes
, books, magazines, newspapers, theatres, travel agencies, unions and, of course, their own therapy centres. Through these media,
Vrouwen
can, and do, form many pressure groups which effect radical changes to society and its laws, on such subjects as birth control, abortion, divorce, homosexuality and equality-through-dominance.
Vrouwen-causes are a classic and typical obsession with which the modern Dutch identify. Any variety can trigger a chain reaction with the hope of achieving the ultimate goal of a Europe-wide demonstration against things that ordinary people would class as petty fads. As an indication of the severity of the infliction, the 1987 Amsterdam Telephone Directory listed no less than 27 entries under ‘
Vrouwen
’ alone. Amongst the more paranoid were:
While gathering background material for this chapter, we attempted to contact 33 women’s organizations in order to ascertain their goals. Of the enquiries dispatched:
So much for the feminists’ desire to make their suffering known to the whole of man- and woman-kind. Typical of the mentality reflected in the replies we did receive:
‘…
we are not against anything. We demand the right to live according to the custom of this country and not to be seen as half of a couple but as an individual person and be treated as such
.’
The custom of the country being that man goes to work, WOMAN remains home with children and housework
.
Despite suffragette-like campaigns, the greater cause of Dutch Vrouwen-freedom can only succeed if blessed with governmental cash. STEO (Stimulation Group for Liberation Research) asks
HFL
6 million annually for ‘
Vrouwen-
studies,’ and
Management Emacipatie
(formed to improve the position of women in career instructions) asks for a budget of
HFL
7.3 million.
Ironically, in their struggle for equality and dominance, many Dutch women emulate and incorporate the very masculine characteristics which they claim they despise. These characteristics have been
vrouwened
upon by concerned males for over three centuries:
…
In their families they are all equals and you have noway to know the master and mistress but by taking them in bed together!—Owen Feltham, London, 1652
…
Most of the women there (Holland) have no taste, are most unfeminine, and walk like farmers!—Hans Algra, South Africa, 1992
Finally on this topic, an extract from a pamphlet supplement issued by the Amsterdam Migrant’s Center is included here in its ORIGINAL, unabridged English language form:
…
And a last example, in which the center did not play a role: Amsterdam house wives became alot more critical on the quality of the vegetables on market places having noticed how the Surinam, Turkishand Moroccan migrants make their choise. The daily supply of previously unknown vegetables proves the influence of the new cuisines on Dutch cooking
.
(Answers on a postcard, please, to…)
Until 1995, Dutch military service was compulsory and limited to just over a one-year period for young males. Now it is strictly a volunteer affair. To some its hardship equals that of a stay in a holiday camp. The ranks are permitted to retain long hair, earrings and other symbols of their mid-childhood, and enjoy full labour benefits (controlled working hours, public holidays, etc.). Even the officers have a union contract. Gays are welcome and received at all entry levels, as an inquiry in the early 1970’s found homosexual exclusion to be discriminatory.
Back in the not-so-distant days of conscription, the alternative to military service was to become a conscientious objector, officially recognized and categorized. A
dienst weigeraar
(service ‘refuser’) performed civilian-type work, or a
totaal weigeraar
(complete ‘refuser’) lounged around in a military prison for about two years. Even after sentencing, a
weigeraar
could conscientiously object—and still have a chance of beating the system. One such
totaal weigeraar
was freed from captivity after 24 hours of hunger striking because the nature of his protest did not fall under the
totaal weigeraar
rules:
HE WAS AGAINST MILITARY SERVICE, BUT WAS NOT AN ANTI-MILITARIST
. Women were (and still are) accepted in the service on a volunteer basis only, and in this capacity were often ridiculed by the general public. Presumably, some were protesting for the right of compulsory service, or refusal; basically…
…
to have the right to go to prison for not wanting to do something they are currently not required to do
.
The subject of effectiveness of the Dutch armed services as a deterrent to potential enemies is an interesting one. One 1992 study indicated that about 30% of a military medical unit in Germany were registered drug users (the unit being known as the ‘
Military Hash Home
’). Hash, marijuana, cocaine and XTC were openly used throughout the military complex—not a good basis for defending one’s homeland.
Given that the purpose of a national army, navy and air force in western Europe is to maintain efficient, co-ordinated and fighting forces under the umbrella of NATO, only the Dutch could employ a Minister for Defence who strives to eliminate violence in the military and who is required to provide ‘relaxation advice’ counseling for the troops. Apparently there is too much boredom and idleness in the Dutch barracks.
Why do they need this military ‘deterrent’ anyway? In the words of Socialist Member of Parliament Klaas de Vries,
This is a self-regulatory society; it is not governed by speeches from above. We allow as many people as possible to be themselves. Some call that anarchy; we call it civilization
.
A spin-off advantage to involvement in NATO at least allows the Dutch image to be stressed abroad. The 1991 International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford, England, featured a ‘Tiger Meet’ as its main theme. The theme was chosen to celebrate the 30
th
anniversary of the NATO Tiger Association. Holland was one of 16 countries that took part. Their F-16 ground crew carried the tiger theme from head to toe, with safari hats and yellow-and-black striped wooden shoes.
(For more on the Dutch image abroad, see Chapter 19.)
RULES FOR SHOPPING
Holland is a cheap place to live, as the shops are always shut
.—John Q. Deacon, British Expatriot.
The Dutch love to window shop and to browse while dreaming of the ultimate bargain. Perhaps in fear of relenting to sales-pressure, many also suffer from the bizarre affliction known as
drempelvrees
(threshold phobia—fear of entering shops, restaurants, etc.). Having managed to cross the
drempel
, they revert to type. For your own protection, take heed of the following: