Read Avengers of the New World: The Story of the Haitian Revolution Online
Authors: Laurent Dubois
victory over, the brutality of colonialism, something which the enslaved
shared with those wiped out by the Spanish centuries before they ever ar-
rived. The choice of the name Haïti, then, infused the declaration of inde-
pendence with a broader historical significance. Haiti was to be the nega-
tion not only of French colonialism, but of the whole history of European
empire in the Americas. The new nation was to channel the centuries of
suffering of those pushed to the margins by the official activity of colonialism into a new political community meant to guarantee the eternal free-
dom of its scarred constituency.40
The proclamation declared that spirits of the dead who had died at the
hands of “those vultures” the French demanded revenge. It was necessary,
furthermore, to give “to the nations” a “terrible, but just, example of the
vengeance that a people proud of having won back its liberty, and ready to
t h o s e w h o d i e
299
jealously preserve it, must exercise.” In the months following the declara-
tion of independence, Dessalines, who like Louverture named himself
governor “for life” (though he would soon give himself another title, that of emperor), made good on these threats. In late February he declared that
all those who were suspected of participation in the massacres ordered by
Leclerc and Rochambeau should be put on trial. He produced a letter
written to Bonaparte in late 1802 by a number of residents celebrating
Rochambeau’s successes and complimenting him for rejecting the “false
philosophy” that had been so detrimental to Saint-Domingue, which could
be “made fertile” only by Africans held under “strict discipline.” It was a
thinly veiled call for the return of slavery, Dessalines claimed, and all the signatories were therefore complicit in the terror the French had inflicted
during their final year in the colony. Dessalines also feared that whites in
the colony were actively conspiring to prepare a new attack aimed at bring-
ing slavery back to the island. He ordered a series of massacres of white in-
habitants, although precisely how many perished is difficult to establish.41
In the wake of the massacres, Dessalines explained that a “handful of
whites” who had “professed” the right “religion”—the rejection of slav-
ery—were under his personal protection. He granted them naturalization
papers that welcomed them “among the children of Haiti.” In order to re-
ceive the papers the whites had to take an oath renouncing France and ac-
cepting the laws of their new land. Many of those who were naturalized
were white women, presumably widows, who were allowed to retain their
property. Their special status was solidified in the constitution proclaimed
in 1805. In it Dessalines declared that “no white, no matter what his na-
tion,” could come to Haiti as “master or property owner,” but he exempted
those who had been naturalized. He also singled out two special groups
who were not included in the ban: the Poles who had deserted or remained
in the colony after the evacuation, and a group of Germans who had been
settled in the colony before the revolution. The constitution went on to de-
clare that, in the interest of eliminating all distinctions of “color” in the nation, all Haitians would henceforth be known as “black.” Haiti was a black
nation, but those who embraced its creed of rejecting France and the slav-
ery it had propagated were welcome to change their official identity and
become a part of it, and therefore of the black race.42
Such exceptions did not lessen the effect of the killing of whites, which
many outside the country pointed to as proof of the barbarity of the new
regime. Dessalines defended his actions as the only way to preserve the
300
av e n g e r s o f t h e n e w w o r l d
freedom won at such cost by his army. “These implacable enemies of
the rights of man have been punished for their crimes,” he declared in an
April 1804 proclamation. The ax had been taken to the tree of “slavery and
prejudice.” The people of Haiti were “mutilated victims” of the “French
whites” and had done what was necessary to preserve their freedom. “Yes,
we have paid these true cannibals back crime for crime, war for war, out-
rage for outrage,” Dessalines thundered. “I have saved my country. I have
avenged America.”43
t h o s e w h o d i e
301
Epilogue: Out of the Ashes
In1803worshiperscarryingfruit,meat,fish,milk,andother
food gathered around an ancient mapou tree in the Artibonite plain.
A call had gone out from the local priests: their “great god, who was
fighting for their prosperity and their liberty,” had been wounded in the
war. He needed food and medicine to help him heal. And so men and
women harvested, cooked, and brought what they could to the mapou tree,
“happy to be able to do something for their divinity.”1
Haiti needed to be healed, for it was a nation founded on ashes. Years of
insurrection and war had weakened and disrupted the economy. It was be-
ing rebuilt when Leclerc’s mission had arrived in 1802, but the final, cata-
clysmic war had brought fire and destruction to most of the cities and
plains. There were dead beyond counting—it is estimated that 100,000 or
more residents of the colony died during the revolution—and many others
were permanently crippled.2
The years of conflict left other, more enduring scars: impulses toward
democracy would long run up against autocratic and militaristic political
traditions, and the social and racial conflicts of the revolutionary years
would continue unabated. While some elites rebuilt parts of the colony’s
plantation economy, producing and profiting from coffee during the nine-
teenth century, many ex-slaves and their descendants chose what they saw
as the true independence of peasant agriculture over the limits of wage la-
bor. In the middle of the century, peasant movements struggled against au-
tocratic governments, seeking to fulfill some of the unachieved promises of
the Haitian Revolution, but were ultimately defeated. Burdened by heavy
taxes and confronted with the cumulative consequences of environmental
degradation, their struggle for a decent life was a difficult one, leaving
many in a grinding poverty that impelled migrations to the nation’s cities
and beyond.3
There was little peace in the years after independence. Dessalines’s
short reign ended with his assassination in 1806, and the young nation
again found itself in a civil war pitting the south, under the command of
Alexandre Pétion (who hosted a beleaguered Simón Bolívar, encouraging
him to abolish slavery in his pursuit of independence in South America),
against the north, ruled by Henri Christophe, who crowned himself king.
On the slopes of the mountains bordering the northern plain, above his
palace at Sans-Souci, Christophe built an impressive fortress. The Citadel,
as he called it, was to stand against the continuing threat of a foreign invasion that would bring slavery back to the land.
Such a threat had been evoked before, in April 1804, by Dessalines,
who had dared the defeated French to try to return: “Let her come, this
power crazy enough to dare attack me!” “At her approach,” he promised,
“the irritated genie of Haiti” would appear, “emerging from the sea,” stir-
ring up the waves, calling up the storms. Its “strong hand” would “shatter
and disperse” the ships. It would send “sickness,” “hunger, “fire,” and “poi-
son” upon its enemies. “But why count on the succor of the climate and
the elements?” Dessalines asked. They were not needed; he had under
his command “rare souls, nourished on adversity,” “sixty thousand men,”
“war-hardened,” ready to fight to avenge their dead brothers. “Let them
come, these homicidal troops; I am waiting for them, standing firm, with a
steady eye.”4
The invasions would come, but not precisely as either Dessalines or
Christophe expected. They would begin with the simple denial that Haiti
existed. Some exiled planters sought to erase what had happened: in 1806
one of them, exiled in Louisiana, noted as part of his property his “Negroes
remaining in Saint-Domingue.” Many governments reacted similarly. The
refusal of diplomatic relations with Haiti pioneered by Jefferson would last
until 1862, when Confederate secession made it possible for the abolition-
ist senator Charles Sumner to lead the way to opening relations with Haiti.
The denial of political existence was accompanied by other attacks on sov-
ereignty. In 1825 the Haitian government agreed to pay an indemnity to
France in return for diplomatic and economic relations. Exiled planters
had been clamoring for such a payment for years: it was meant to repay
them for what they had lost in Saint-Domingue, including the money in-
vested in their slaves, and amounted to a fine for revolution. Unable to pay, e p i l o g u e
303
the Haitian government took loans from French banks, entering a cycle of
debt that would last into the twentieth century. When foreign invasion did
finally come, it was not by the French, but by the United States, which oc-
cupied Haiti in 1915, crushing a resistance movement whose soldiers be-
lieved they were fighting a second Haitian Revolution, and departed in
1934, but not before Haiti’s constitution was altered to allow whites again
to own land there.5
Even as Haiti struggled, the ramifications of its revolution reshaped the
world around it. The victory of the black troops of Saint-Domingue paved
the way for the Louisiana Purchase. Bonaparte’s mission to the colony had
been the centerpiece of a new colonial policy aimed at reinvigorating the
French presence in the Americas—Louisiana was meant to supply food
for the reconstructed plantation society of Saint-Domingue—and when it
was crushed he had little choice but to give up his ambitions, to the profit
of an expanding United States. As a result slavery thrived and expanded in
North America during the next decades. In the Caribbean, planters and
administrators in Cuba stepped into the vacuum created by the destruc-
tion of what had been the most important supplier of the world’s sugar.
In the nineteenth century sugar plantations sprang up throughout Cuba,
sometimes staffed by exiles from Saint-Domingue, and worked by African
slaves. The latter were imported into the colony in massive numbers: be-
tween 1790 and 1867 nearly as many were introduced to Cuba as had been
imported to Saint-Domingue in the entire eighteenth century. The prece-
dent of the Haitian Revolution, however, made some worry about the
danger of importing African slaves: one Puerto Rican writer wondered
whether they would “come to form a multitude” that might become an “ex-
terminating thunderbolt.”6
While Haiti represented a nightmare to many slave masters, it was
a source of inspiration for slaves throughout the Americas. “Within one
month after the 1791 uprising, slaves in Jamaica were singing songs about
it,” and within a few years masters “from Virginia to Louisiana to Cuba and
Brazil were complaining of a new ‘insolence’ on the part of their slaves,
which they often attributed to awareness of the successful black revolu-
tion.” In Richmond the example of Haiti inspired a slave named Gabriel
in 1800 to plan a bold conspiracy that envisioned a collaboration between
whites and blacks—perhaps an echo of the alliance that brought down slav-
ery in Saint-Domingue in 1793—in pursuit of emancipation. Years later,
in 1861, an anonymous pamphlet was published in Boston, reprinting
304
av e n g e r s o f t h e n e w w o r l d
Sonthonax’s 1793 decrees and arguing that the Union should follow his ex-
ample by arming and freeing slaves in order to defeat internal rebellion.7
Images of the leaders of the Haitian Revolution were an inspiration to
people of African descent throughout the Americas. In Rio de Janeiro in
1805, soldiers of African descent wore “medallion portraits of the emperor
Dessalines.” In Cuba a free black named José Antonio Aponte, who was
accused of conspiring to revolt in 1812, had portraits of Henri Christophe,
Toussaint Louverture, Jean-François, and Dessalines in his home. Rebels