Authors: Christopher Lukas
I think that Bob saw in Dad a passport to higher ideals—but he never attained them. Dad saw in Bob a chance to get his ideas known, and to make more money.
I might have taken more after Bob, but I didn’t have an entrepreneurial spirit. Tony was a different matter: he was always going to follow in Dad’s footsteps. He was a serious boy who was going to lead an ethically and professionally serious life. I remember once, for instance, in the middle of August in Cutchogue, a hurricane blew across the island, threatening boats, houses, and people. Tony and I went down to the causeway as the winds blew themselves out and discovered a man in his thirties trying to capture his small powerboat, which had broken loose from its mooring some miles away and was threatening to crash onto the shore. We waded out into the waist-high, choppy waters and helped bring it safely to rest on the sand. The man dug into his water-sodden pockets and gave each of us $5. Or at least I thought each of us received it. When I got home and was changing clothes, I pulled my bill from my pocket. Tony was aghast.
“You didn’t take that, did you?”
I asked why not.
“You don’t take money for helping people in a crisis,” he said.
It was a firm and memorable reprimand from my big brother, and I was ashamed and embarrassed. This was not the first—or the last—time that he chose to be my ethics teacher. Underneath my shame, I was intensely angry.
Dad drove out to Cutchogue on Friday nights and was always a little sour when he arrived. Had we behaved ourselves? What did we eat when he wasn’t around? Were we meeting any interesting kids? Did we thank Bob and Jessica for the bicycles, access to their rowboat, their Deepfreeze, their love and kindness?
These were not idle questions; Dad had strong ideas about what two young teenagers
should
be doing with their vacation. They should be learning social skills, dating girls, reading good books, and behaving themselves.
Whatever we did, it was not in line with Dad’s hopes. We did
not
try to meet and make new friends. We did
not
read edifying literature. We did
not
tidy our beds. Those months were luxurious, because never again would Tony and I have so much time to ourselves with no obligations. They were also painful, because these were supposed to be the summers when Dad took the time to really
be
with us, but this didn’t happen. The old arguments cropped up, and Dad’s two days at the beach were always shadowed by what he thought he owed us and what he knew he couldn’t give us.
What had we done in any particular week? We had probably arisen late, eaten a leisurely breakfast, packed a lunch of Kool-Aid, peanut butter sandwiches, and cookies, ridden our bikes a mile to that causeway, and sunned ourselves on the very fine stretch of sand. When the sun got too hot, we waded out into the bay, which, at low tide, provided a magnificent bed of huge hard-shell clams for the picking.
We were shy teenagers, ill matched in intellect and interests: Tony was still a baseball fanatic, I liked to sail; he read history books, I chose fantasies; Tony got As at school, I was still “not living up” to my potential. But almost nothing could defeat the joy we shared when we waded out into the warm waters of the bay and pulled those clams—fully three inches across—from the sand just under our feet, filling floating plastic buckets with enough of the mollusks to make a feast for ourselves.
Unlike modern-day adolescents, Tony and I were sufficiently repressed that we avoided discussing dating or girls or sex. I learned what I knew (and it wasn’t much) from dormitory discussions; what Tony knew or where he learned it, I don’t know. Once he asked Dad what masturbation was (the answer from our father: “Manipulation of the penis until it gives you a pleasant feeling. It ruins things for later on”), but that was the extent of our joint sessions with Dad on sex. In fact, I didn’t even think that Tony
had
anything like carnal desire. His intellectual conflagrations burned so brightly that I assumed they extinguished anything else. Later, when I realized how eagerly Tony sought out women for companionship and sex, I found out that he was just like other boys in that regard.
One crucial day in 1949 was the demarcation for me between a fearful childhood and a fearful adolescence. I had always hidden my deep fears of Dad
from
Dad: my belief that he was powerful enough to deprive me of Mother; that he had a
choice
as to whether to make our childhood safe or not; that he might wreak physical havoc on me if I told him how angry I was about losing my mother and my home.
That particular Saturday in July, my mask would come off.
It started quite simply enough with Dad asking us what we had done, and why we hadn’t swept the sand out of the cottage, and why the dishes were dirty, and why this and why that. I was silent. Tony started to argue with our father. I begged him to stop, and then began to cry. My father stared in amazement. What was wrong with me?
“He’s afraid of you,” said my brother, revealing the dirty little secret for the first time.
Dad appeared astonished. “Afraid? Why?”
I realized that he actually had
no
understanding of the emotions I had been experiencing since Mother’s death. He didn’t know that I loved him and hated him, or that I feared him for what he had done to us. He didn’t know that I felt guilty for having been angry at Mother when she didn’t show up to say good-bye. He didn’t know that part of me believed that
he
had spirited her away. And I myself didn’t know that my longing for my mother had caused me such great anger and self-loathing.
The magical thinking of childhood had perverted my reasoning into two choices: either I had been responsible for my mother’s death or
he
had. Either way, it caused anxiety, anger, and guilt.
If
he
was responsible for Mother’s death, I was furious at him, but afraid of his power. If
I
was responsible for her death, he was going to kill me for that.
He sat there, stunned, at my tears.
“You don’t ever have to be afraid of me,” he said. “There’s nothing I would ever do to hurt you.” I didn’t answer.
“Don’t you know that no matter what you did, I would always love you?”
He had said this many times, and all it did was reinforce my childish belief that I
had
done something wrong.
He shrugged his shoulders in helpless confusion. The conversation ended, but the effects lingered on and on.
IN THE SUMMER OF 1951
, Dad paid for Tony to go to England, as a high school graduation gift. I went off to be a counselor at a summer camp for underprivileged kids.
The camp was the wrong place for me. I had no experience dealing with young children, much less those who couldn’t hear or had been through hard knocks. Despite my eagerness to do what was asked of me, despite comments about what a competent young man I was, I became frightened by what I saw as my incompetence.
I wrote to Dad:
I’m being driven literally to a mental frustration which it will be difficult for me to come out of. I know that sounds dramatic, but I am rather young to be a counselor of such 11 year olds.
But the real event of the summer occurred when I found myself in a railroad station with Dad at the end of the summer, waiting to take a train to Marblehead for a mini-vacation with Missy, where I could swim and sail and be sybaritic.
While we waited, I told him about a letter I had received from a girlfriend. In it she let me know that she was not interested in seeing me anymore. I told Dad I was very upset.
“She looks like your mother, you know,” Dad said.
“Nah,” I said.
“Sure,” he replied, pulling out his wallet and showing me a tiny color photo of Mother, a picture I had not known even existed. I wondered how many times he had extracted that photograph from its hiding place and looked at it—longingly or angrily or with despair. I had never known what feelings he had about her, because he never talked about them. In the ten years since Mother’s death, he had never volunteered a word about the woman he had married, the woman who had given birth to me. I always assumed he had been hopelessly in love, and equally hopelessly in pain when she died, but he never said. Dad never volunteered to expand on the story.
In a minute, he was about to.
I looked at the picture of my mother without having feelings about her as my mother. I was simply comparing her with my girlfriend, looking at resemblances, not thinking of Mother as a
person
, not even a dead person. At that moment I felt a greater pang at my girlfriend’s negative message than at Mother’s absence.
“You know that she killed herself, don’t you?” Dad said, and all thoughts of my girlfriend disappeared. Had he really said that? Was I being tested for some reason? Was it a horrible joke? No, he was serious, as he’d been ten years earlier, at another railroad station, when Tony and I returned from camp.
I managed a strangled “Why?”
“She was sick,” Dad said.
“Of what?”
“Mentally.”
In the years since then, I’ve asked myself many times why I didn’t take a later train, why I didn’t stay and pepper him with questions. How—after all these years of unanswered and strangled doubts—could I just sit there, in shock? Perhaps it was because Dad himself was apparently unmoved, tearless. Why was he cruelly telling me the most important fact of my life at this time, when there was no room for discussion and with people milling about? No room to digest the news. Shock and awe silenced me.
Barely able to get the question out, I asked, “Why didn’t you tell me before?”
“I thought you already knew.”
I should have done more than shake my head. I should have shouted at him in anger. Or broken into sobs. How dare he think I knew and still never talk to me about Mother’s death!
Now I understand. Now I know that he was in a permanent shock, one from which he never recovered. His own anger, guilt, sadness, and longing were never worked out—not in therapy, not in grief, not in personal conversations. He buried all of those too deep in himself to be able to communicate with his sons. Gin and bourbon became his only therapists.
I asked one more question before I left.
“Was Mother there when I was a child?”
“Physically, yes,” Dad said.
I stumbled on board the train and sat in thought for the three hours it took me to get to Marblehead.
Stunned is what I felt—stunned and startled and hurt. I was furious at Mother. She had taken her own life and abandoned me in the process. I was furious at all the adults who had done nothing to protect me, to prevent her death, all those who had not told me the truth.
What was I to do with this news? I knew nothing about suicide. I had never known anyone or heard of anyone who killed himself. I felt guilty that I was angry, but equally furious that I was not permitted to shout and storm and tear my clothes.
My next impulse was that there was more to the story than the little I now knew. Dad had
done
something to make her kill herself. He had sent her away to Tripp Lake, rejected her. He had mistreated her. Because I didn’t understand that Mother had a disease, a mental disorder, I concluded that Dad had been culpable. That’s why he was secretive. He was
more
dangerous than I had thought!
Exhausted, I fell asleep. I couldn’t think about this now. Later. Tomorrow.
I did not throw myself at Missy and ask her about Mother’s death. That would have been too difficult, too soon after the ugly news. The next day, however, after four hours of cruising in a brisk wind by myself in a 110 sailboat, I felt ready to broach the subject with my grandmother. She immediately broke into tears.
“I wanted to tell you, darling. All these years. But your father . . .”
Had she really wanted to tell me? In the ten years since 1941, she had never brought the subject up, except in the most general terms. She never came close to hinting how Mother had died. If she talked about her at all, it was with tears and sobs, but she never got beyond them—to the truth.
I spoke with Dad about Mother’s suicide only once more. It was the summer after I graduated from college. “You’re better off,” he assured me, talking about a passionate love affair (my first real sex) that had ended a few weeks earlier, “if your girlfriend was as nutty as you say.”
“Would you have been better off not marrying Mother?” I asked, more as a retort than expecting a real answer. Without a moment’s hesitation, he nodded his head.
“Yes. I would have been better off.”
I was shocked, and hurt. Not to have had my mother at all—that was unthinkable.
In the time since I had first learned about Mother’s suicide, I had given some thought to what it was like for Dad to live with her. I had talked with Uncle Ira about it, and he had given me some hint of the wild swings that governed Mother’s life, of the terrible nights she must have put Dad through. That was when Ira told me that he, too, was bipolar, and I learned that he used medication to control his mood swings, medication that hadn’t been available to Mother in the early 1940s. We even briefly day-dreamed together what might have been had Mother had lithium and other modern drugs instead of having to rely on shock therapy and psychoanalysis.
When Tony came back from England, I immediately told him about the suicide. He sat for a moment, but asked me no questions except “Are you sure?”
In fact, for the rest of his life, Tony showed no journalistic curiosity about his past, none of the fire and passion that he exhibited about other people’s problems, their day-to-day lives. We
both
continued in psychological and intellectual denial.
MORE AND MORE
, Tony and I ventured out into the city without Dad or Missy in tow. Our independence from them resulted in a special brand of camaraderie, one in which Tony’s greater pluck overcame my more timid nature. We explored precincts in which Dad and Missy wouldn’t be caught dead—places like the seedy and precarious Hubert’s Flea Circus. This inelegant emporium lay in the middle of Forty-second Street, between theaters showing endless Marx Brothers’ films and flashy burlesque shows. We went there with some fear for our safety: Forty-second Street was then an area known by all to be the province of perverts, prostitutes, and pickpockets. As we walked carefully off Broadway, where brilliant billboards lit up the city, we scanned the streets for danger.
It was worth it. At Hubert’s, for a few cents, we would gape at the bearded lady, the midget twins, and other oddities of the era. We would revel in frivolity. At the end, for a few extra pennies, we could peek into the flea circus itself, where we were persuaded that the little insects actually wore costumes and did acrobatics. We were gullible and easily entertained and thrilled with having witnessed the forbidden together.
Then there was
magic
. We had both decided that we wanted to be magicians. We
had
to be magicians. Under the old elevated tracks that still ran along Sixth Avenue, Tony and I visited cranky little shops that catered to amateurs and professionals alike. Above our heads, we could hear and feel the wobbly trains of the IND line as they cast shadows down onto the seamy shops below.
We entered stores filled with mystery, wishing to become midget Houdinis. We learned to do a few card tricks, to make silk handkerchiefs appear and disappear, and to watch other customers create much greater illusions. At the time, I dearly wished I could learn enough to make Mother reappear. But even Houdini couldn’t do that.
SOME EXPERIENCES
weren’t quite so exhilarating. One December—we were no more than eleven and nine—Tony and I sauntered into a store to buy soap or sachets or some such holiday gift for Missy. Dressed up in three-quarter-length winter coats with fake fur collars, we must have looked the quintessence of little rich boys. As we walked through a quiet part of the store on an upper floor, four boys, a little older than we, approached. One asked if we knew the time. When Tony pulled back his sleeve to look at his wristwatch, the kids knew they had a good target. “Give us what you’ve got,” the toughest said. I remember literally shivering in fright. Tony tried to face them down, while I begged him to give them something. Seeing how frightened I was, he relented. They got away with no more than $1.60, but Tony was furious with me for being such a coward. Still, I was relieved to get away without a beating, and felt secure in the knowledge that I had a big brother who would protect me.
The truest shared passion—our own little piece of heaven on earth—was theater. This was mostly an outgrowth of our early experience with Mother in White Plains, playing out our feelings on the window seat in our dining room. Being rewarded with her smile and applause.
Dad, too, found the lure of theater irresistible. I remember sitting in the living room of his small apartment on Seventy-ninth Street as he recited a peroration from
Henry V
, his hand and index finger stabbing the air, one eyebrow raised in an expression of melodramatic exhortation. It was a stirring if over-the-top rendition. Tony and I found it thrilling to hear our father perform something in a realm that we ourselves found fascinating. There were a few other recitations: something from Blake. But
Henry V
was the topper.
Once more unto the breach, dear friends . . .
There were also visits to New York theaters under Dad’s tutelage—when we were at an age to appreciate the works. In those days—the 1940s and ’50s—you could buy a good seat in a Broadway theater for $3.75 or $4.50. At least two or three times during our vacations, starting when we were no more than eight and ten, Dad would find the money and the time to take us to performances. These were sometimes musicals (I enjoyed watching
Finian’s Rainbow
from a front-row seat), but often dramas of significant weight (
Hamlet
,
The Winslow Boy
, and others of the time). Tony and I thrilled to these experiences, and my brother would hoard Playbills in the bookcase that Missy allotted to each of us.
At Putney, we both served on stage crew; we acted in a variety of plays. Tony played Hotspur in
Henry IV
.
Together, Tony and I crammed as many performances as we could into our short vacations, discussing the assets and debits of each one, keeping the experience locked tight in our memories. We went to the Fourth Street Theater to see almost the entire oeuvre of Chekhov, played by some of the old master actors of classical theater in New York.
For these hours, we set aside sibling rivalry, the arguments, petty jealousies, angry wrestling, and fistfights. We doused our anxieties, adolescent doubts, anger, and pain in the art and craft of theater. Through theater, we were bound by an aesthetic that was built into us—by genetics, by education, by emotion. We were no longer on divergent tracks that characterized every other sphere of our lives, but focused on one agreed passion, compounded by our need for applause, our love of words, and our common blood.
Theater was also a way for both of us to use emotions that we could not—or preferred not to—express in other ways. Such feelings as anger, sorrow, and revenge could serve us well in roles that Shakespeare wrote. In real life, their expression was dangerous.
One example: In my first year at Putney, Tony and I fought, both verbally and physically, often bitterly, violently. I remember a slug match that had us rolling around the floor. Though Tony was at least ten pounds heavier than I, there was something of the desperate scrapper about me. I could hang on with my nails or teeth or legs while being pummeled. I could take the pain of punches in the hope of turning the tables on Tony. On this particular occasion, I recall being on top of him, pounding his chest, and screaming, “I’ll gouge your eyes out!” It sounds almost Victorian, but those are the actual words I used.
From Putney, Tony went to Harvard. That institution was the perfect place for him. Within a few days of arriving, he had settled into Harvard Yard, where thousands of students before him, from the seventeenth century onward, had lived and eaten. He was a Lowell House resident, an intellectual in the company of like-minded individuals. He signed up for courses in religion, history, and political science. And, shortly, he set his sights on the daily university newspaper, the
Harvard Crimson
, whose membership claimed the best and the brightest, generation after generation. He hoped—no, he was
certain
—that the
Crimson
would be a stepping-stone to the
New York Times
.
Tony learned about the
Times
(and journalism in general) from a genial man named Richard Strouse, whom he encountered in the mid-1940s at Christmas parties given by friends of Dad’s in Mamaroneck, the ones we attended because we didn’t really think of ourselves as Jewish.
It was here that Tony, only about fourteen, once expressed to our hosts his desire to be a newspaper reporter. Dad’s friend suggested he talk with Strouse, who was then at the
Times
. The older man was delighted to sound Tony out about his ideas for a future, and they struck up a once-a-year friendship in which Dick gave Tony hints about preparing for such a career. If Tony had not seen the
Times
as his primary place of employment before this point, there is no doubt that he did so after several years with Strouse at the Mamaroneck house.
Early on, Dad and I began to receive clippings from the
Crimson
in the few letters Tony sent that first year: interviews with Adlai Stevenson for his first run at the presidency and with McGeorge Bundy, then dean of the college (later architect, with John F. Kennedy, of the beginnings of the Vietnam debacle). Tony had found his calling. If he hadn’t been such a good student—so adept at reading and retaining huge amounts of material—I doubt that he could have carried both his academic load and the demands of the
Crimson
. He was prodigious in his duties at the paper. He spent every evening there, and much of each afternoon. He became assistant managing editor; he wrote stories that made the front page time and again; he learned the techniques that would put him in good stead later: how to interview, how to ask questions, how to sniff out the story.
Tony was convinced that the
Crimson
would offer him the kind of training and experience necessary for an entry into the “real” world of newspaper publishing, but it always seemed to me that the
Crimson
—a daily of considerable heft—already
was
real-world publishing. At Harvard, Tony was a bylined reporter for a respected paper, one that broke stories to be picked up by other local Boston papers, one that stepped on toes that needed to be stepped on. He seemed well beyond basic training when he graduated.
No better statement of how Tony operated at Harvard could be found than in the words of another Crimsonite, David Halberstam:
It was the fall of 1951 and we were freshman candidates for the
Crimson
. He walked into that newsroom different from the rest of us, already fully formed intellectually: he was passionately serious, yet surprisingly gentle for someone so fiercely ambitious, and finally, he was also darkly brooding . . .
In the 1950s, in the world of the
Crimson
, boys taught boys. Tony was my first great mentor. He helped teach me that journalism was not just the collection of bylines, but that it had to be about something larger . . .
I still take pride from the fact that the first issue our board put out in February 1954 contained a long, detailed magazine piece by Tony about the life of Wendell Furry, an associate professor of physics at Harvard and an early Communist Party member then very much under attack from McCarthy. The piece detailed why Furry had joined the party and what party meetings had been like. It was an astonishing piece of reporting. He was all of 20 at the time. The Associated Press moved the entire piece on its wire. The next day the managing editor of the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch
called to offer him a job. “Would it be all right if I just came for the summer instead?” he said. Why just the summer? asked the editor, slightly annoyed. “Well, I still have a year of college left,” he answered.
In their junior year, Halberstam was elected managing editor of the paper. Tony never got that appointment, not even as a senior.
THE YEAR AFTER
Tony entered Harvard, I got into Swarthmore. Tony had told me there was no point in my even applying there because I wouldn’t get in. And if I did, I wouldn’t be up to the intellectual standards.
When I look back these many years, from Tony’s point of view—from what he’d seen of my academic achievements so far—he was right. I
didn’t
have the intellectual chops to make it. But Swarthmore deans thought otherwise. They looked at my SATs and at my nonacademic work (flute, chorus, theater) and decided they could take a chance on me.
Gradually, I found subjects in which I could both operate and write. I discovered how our professors wanted us to think about the world—broadly, deeply, with skepticism, but not cynicism. At the end of my sophomore year, I had decided on psychology as a major.
I was in the Honors Program. Seminars were small—six to eight students at most—and we were all expected to contribute both verbally and on paper. It was grueling, full of stress, but it also gave me a rigorous start to life in the real world, where independence of thought was required for the professions I eventually entered. I learned how to communicate on paper as well as with the spoken word. I came to think better of myself, academically. And, because the community was a small one (only nine hundred students), other teachers and other students knew of my work and my accomplishments. God knows how I would have fared at a large university like Harvard! I didn’t give it a thought.