Hinduism: A Short History (37 page)

Read Hinduism: A Short History Online

Authors: Klaus K. Klostermaier

HCIP
, vol. II, pp. 453ff.
14.
   Guṅaratna, a commentator on Haribhadra, specifies this statement saying that the Nāyaikas were Śaivas, the Vaiśeṣikas Pāśupatas. Also the followers of the Sāṁkhya and the Yoga systems were considered Śaivas.
15.
   There are some coins of Kadphises II with a Śiva image, the inscription calling Kadphises II Maheśvara. A king Gautamīputra Vindhyāvedhana received, according to a coin, his kingdom from Maheśvara and Mahasena. His banner shows a bull. Cf.
HCIP
, vol. II, p. 177; 140; 150; 152; 455ff. According to D. C. Sircar, “The Śākta Pithas,” in
JRASB
, SIV, 1(1948), the
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad
is earlier than the
Bhagavadgītā
(third century B.C.E.). In it Śiva is identified with the Bhagavat Maheśvara in whose power are Māyā and prakṛti. “Knowing Śiva, who is minuter than the minutest, the creator and protector of the universe, the one having many forms and the one alone encompassing the world and concealed in all beings, men become free from all fetters and attain eternal peace.” Sircar further maintains: “The exceptionally large number of Indian rulers of all parts of the country in records dating from the first century A.D., the mention of ten generations of Pāśupata
ācāryas
in a Mathurā inscription of 381 A.D. and the evidence of the Epics and Purāṇas show beyond a doubt that Śiva’s status at least in the early centuries of the Christian era was practially the same as it is today in the religious life of India” (p. 104).
16.
Mahābhārata
, Karṇaparvan (Critical Ed.) 24, 41ff; 24, 63.
17.
Matsya
and
Śiva Purāṇa
are ascribed to the Gupta period.
18.
   Kālidāsa’s
Śakuntalā
opens with a beautiful hymn to Śiva in which eight forms of Śiva are mentioned: water, fire, sacrificer, sun, moon, ether, sound, earth. Similar
mahgalas
in Śiva’s honor are also found before
Mālavikāgnimitra
and
Vikramorvaśīya
.
19.
   S. Satchidānandam Pillai, “The Śaiva Saints of South India,” in
CHI
, vol. IV, pp. 339ff.
20.
HCIP
, vol. IV, pp. 300ff.
21.
   Ibid. See also the interesting essay by Paul Hacker, “Śaṅkara der Yogin und Śaṅkara der Advaitin: Einige Beobachtungen,” in
WZKS
, XII/XIII (1968), pp. 119–148.
22.
HCIP
, vol. V, pp. 442ff.
23.
   Ibid., I, 114; II, 33; VII, 46. Partly concerned with Rudra are: I, 43: V, 3; V, 42; VI, 74; VII, 59.
24.
Ṛgveda
X, 92, 9.
25.
   A. P. Karmarkar,
The Religions of India
, finds evidence for the solar character of Śiva-Rudra in the following texts:
1.
Ṛgveda
I, 115, 1: Sūrya is the
ātman
of the universe
2.
Atharva Veda
XI, 2, 4: Rudra is called thousand-eyed = Sun
3.
Maitri Upamsad
VI, 7: “Bharga” is Rudra
4.
Padma Purāṇa
V, 24, 687: Śiva is Sūrya; V, 20, 13: Sun is
rudravapuṣa
5.
Saura Purāṇa
II, 47: “Rudra stands in the skies”
6.
Garuḍa Purāṇa
, Acara Khanda 23, 6 mentions as a Śivamantra:
Śivasūryāyāh nāmah
7.
Mahābhārata
, Śāntiparvan 290, 86: Śiva is addressed as sun
The same author also thinks that Śiva had been originally worshiped under the form of a fish.
26.
Ṛgveda
I, 114. Here Rudra is addressed as
kapardin
and asked for health, bliss and well-being.
27.
   The
Satarudnya
forms the 16th chapter of the
Yajurveda
according to the Vajasaneyasamhita. English translation by J. Eggeling in
SBE
, vol. XLIII,
Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa
, vol. IV, pp. 150ff., and R. T. H. Griffith,
The Texts of the White Yajurveda
, pp. 168ff.
28.
   A. P. karmarkar,
The Religions of India
, vol. I, p. 58.
29.
   J. Eggeling,
SBE
, vol. XLII, p. 150.
30.
   R. T. H. Griffith,
Hymns of the Yajurveda
, p. 168.
31.
   Ibid., v. 54.
32.
   Another major invocation of Rudra is found in
White Yajurveda
(Vajasaneya Saṃhitā) III, 57ff.; (Griffith, pp. 28ff.).
33.
Atharvaveda
V, 20.
34.
   Ibid., v. 21.
35.
Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa
IX, 1, 1, 6 (translation by J. Eggeling).
36.
Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa
I, 1, 1, 1.
Kausttaki Brāhmaṇa
VI, 1–9: the eight names of Rudra (Bhava, Śarva, Paśupati, Ugra, Mahādeva, Rudra, Iśāna, Asanih) are explained.
37.
   Ibid., V, 4, 4, 12.
38.
Aitareya Brāhmaṇa
III, 34, 7.
39.
   Ibid., I, 3, 9 and 10.
40.
   S. Radhakrishnan,
Indian Philosophy
, vol. I, p. 142 says that it is certain that the
Śvetāśvatara Upamsad
is post-Buddhistic; it is difficult to say whether it is pre-Christian too.
41.
Śvetāśvatara Upamsad
III, 1.
42.
   Ibid., V, 14.
43.
   A. Mahadeva Sastri (ed.),
The Sawa Upaniṣads
, No. 3:
Atharvaśira Upamsad
, pp. 20–38. English translation by Srinivasa Ayangar, pp. 28–53.
44.
   The efficacy of the tripuṇḍra is explained in
Kalagnirudra Upamsad (Sawa Upaniṣads
, No. 4): by applying the tripuṇḍra on one’s forehead illumination follows – without it, it is impossible.’
45.
Vālmiki Rāmayāṇa
I, 65, 9–12.
46.
   D. C. Sircar,
The Śākta Pīthas
, pp. 5ff. connects the Dakṣa story of the Epics and Purāṇas with the ancient myths of Prajāpati’s incest with his daughter
(RVX
, 61, 57). According to
Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa
I, 7, 4, Iff., Rudra pierced Prajāpati, identified with the sacrifice, with an arrow. The injured portion blinds Bhaga and knocks out the teeth of Pusan – it is finally allotted to Rudra. In my paper “The Original Dakṣa Saga”
(Journal of South Asian Literature
XX/1, 1985, 93–107) I attempt to prove that the core of the Dakṣa myth consists of the record of the Śaivite conquest of Kanakhala, a
tirtha
on the Ganges close to today’s Hardwar It was of great importance to Śaivites, Vaiṣṇavas and Sāktas alike, and linked to an important Vedic settlement associated with a famous patriarch Dakṣa.
47.
Mahābhārata
, Śāntiparvan, chap. 274 (Critical Ed.).
48.
   Critical Ed. XII, 274 takes only the first version into the text and brings the second one (interpolation) in Appendix I, 28 (vol. 16, pp. 2049ff.), Southern Recension. The editor remarks: this passage is substantially the same as
Vāyu Purāṇa
I, 30, 79ff. and
Brahma Purāṇa
38–40.
49.
   In a former chapter (I, 30) it explains the mutual hatred of Dakṣa and Śiva.
50.
Vāyu Purāṇa
30, 249.
51.
   This forms one of the most important topics in Śaiva-siddhānta. The
Nāyanārs
who dwelt at length on Śiva’s love and grace were probably responsible for this emphasis on Śiva Nīlakaṇṭha as the merciful redeemer, whose vicarious suffering they celebrate.
52.
Vālmiki Rāmayāṇa
I, 45, 20–26 (I, 44, 14ff. Critical Ed.).
53.
Mahābhārata
, Adiparvan, chap. 16.
54.
Viṣṇu Purāṇa
I, 9, 92ff.
55.
Bhāgavata Purāṇa
VIII, 7ff.
56.
Mahābhārata
, Karṇaparvan 24.
57.
   Ibid., v. 63.
58.
   Ibid., 34, 104 (Critical Ed., App. I, 4).
59.
   Ibid., 34, 115ff.
60.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Rudrasaṃhitā, Yuddhakhaṇḍa 44ff. Also Andhakavadha:
Matsya Purāṇa
, chap. 179.
61.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Rudrasāmhita, Yuddhakhanda 46.
62.
   Ibid., chaps. 26ff.
63.
Bhāgavata Purāṇa
X, 88: a rather wicked question is put at the beginning of the story: Parīkṣit wonders why the worshipers of Śiva are usually wealthy and enjoy life – while the worshipers of Viṣṇu are poor. sūka’s answer is that Śiva is endowed with the three
guṇas
and the “deity presiding over
ahamkara,”
whereas Viṣṇu is beyond
prakṛti
. Therefore the worshipers of Śiva acquire wealth – and those of Viṣṇu obtain transcendental Vaikuṇṭha.
64.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Rudrasaṃhitā, III, 18;
Liṅga Purāṇa
I, 101.
65.
Liṅga Purāṇa
I, 106.
66.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Rudrasāmhita, Pārvatīkhanda, 30.
67.
   A. K. Coomaraswamy,
The Dance of Śiva
, pp. 85ff.
68.
Mahābhārata
, Anuśāsanaparvan 14, 134ff.
69.
Mahābharata
, Anuśāsanaparvan, 14, 140ff.
70.
   The text itself says explicitly so: every
avatāra
is located in one of the many
dvāpara-yugas
.
71.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Vāyavīyasaṃhitā defends both the Pāśupata (personalistic) viewpoint and the Vedāntic (a-personalistic) viewpoint.
72.
   S. Suryanarayana Sastri, “The Philosophy of Śaivism,” in
CHI
, vol. Ill, pp. 387ff.
73.
   Text and English translation S. Radhakrishnan,
The Principal Upani-sads
, pp. 707ff.
74.
   K.A. Nilakantha Sastri, “An Historical Sketch of Śaivism,” in
CHI
, vol. IV, pp. 63ff.
75.
   T. M. P. Mahadevan, “Śaivism,” in
HCIP
, vol. II, p. 453 refers to one inscription of C.E. 971 at the temple of Natha near EkaLiṅga north of Udaipur.
76.
Śiva Purāṇa
, Rudrasāmhita, Sātīkhaṇḍa 23.
77.
   Mādhava,
Śarvadarśanasaṁgraha
, chap. VII. The most comprehensive modern treatment of Śaiva Siddhānta is found in K. Śivaraman,
Śaivism in Philosophical Perspective
, Benares: Motilal Banarsidass, 1973.
78.
   Cf. S. N. Dasgupta,
HIPh
, vol. V, pp. lOff. fixes the date of Meykaṇḍadeva at c.1235 C.E. and that of Srīkaṇṭha at 1270 C.E.
79.
   Ibid.
80.
   Ibid.
81.
   V A. Devasenapathi,
Śaiva Siddhānta
, p. 192.
82.
   Ibid., p. 175: “Not acting according to the precepts of scriptures is sin; acting in accordance with the precepts of the scriptures but without being actuated by love for all beings is virtue. Hence both are to be treated as diseases. The Lord causes those who disobey the scriptures to be hurled into hell and removes their sins after they have been properly punished. By causing them to experience the joys of heaven he removes their virtues.”
83.
   Ibid., p. 266 (quoting Jflanaprakasar).
84.
   Ibid., p. 244.
85.
   Ibid., p. 249.
86.
   Ibid., p. 258.
87.
   Ibid., p. 259.
88.
   Ibid., p. 257.
89.
   Ibid., p. 274.
90.
   Ibid., p. 277.
91.
   Roma Chaudhuri,
The Doctrine of Srīkaṇṭha
, and English translation of
Srīkaṇṭha Bhāsya, 2
vols.
92.
Srīkaṇṭha Bhāsya

Other books

Under the Orange Moon by Frances, Adrienne
After Dark by Gena Showalter
Pentecost by J.F. Penn
Reel Murder by Mary Kennedy
Stolen Lives by Jassy Mackenzie
Stoker's Manuscript by Prouty, Royce
No Strings by Opal Carew
Vacuum by Bill James