Honeybath's Haven

 

 

Honeybath's Haven

 

First published in 1977

© Michael Innes Literary Management Ltd.; House of Stratus 1977-2010

 

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.

 

The right of Michael Innes to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted.

 

This edition published in 2010 by House of Stratus, an imprint of

Stratus Books Ltd., Lisandra House, Fore Street, Looe,

Cornwall, PL13 1AD, UK.

 

Typeset by House of Stratus.

 

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress.

 

ISBN: 0755121198   EAN: 9780755121199

 

This is a fictional work and all characters are drawn from the author's imagination.
Any resemblance or similarities to persons either living or dead are entirely coincidental.

 

 

 

Note for Readers

 

Reader preferences vary, as do eReaders.

 

This eBook is designed to be read by any eReading device or software that is capable of reading ePub files.Readers maydecide to adjustthe textwithinthe capability of their eReader. However, style, paragraph indentation, line spacing etc. is optimised to produce a near equivalent reflowable version of the printed edition of the title when read withAdobe® Digital Editions. Other eReaders may vary from this standard and be subject to the nuances of design and implementation. Further, not allsimulators on computers and tablets behave exactly as their equivalent eReader. Wherever possible it is recommended the following eReader settings, or their equivalent (if available), be used:

 

Clear Local Data – off; Local Styling – off;Text Alignment – Publisher Default.

 

 

www.houseofstratus.com

 

 

 

Michael Innes is thepseudonym of John Innes Mackintosh Stewart, who was born in Edinburgh in 1906. His father was Director ofEducation and as was fitting the young Stewart attended EdinburghAcademy before going up to Oriel, Oxford where he obtaineda first class degree in English.

After a shortinterlude travelling with AJP Taylor in Austria,he embarked on an edition of
Florio's
translation of
Montaigne's Essays
andalso took up a post teaching English at Leeds University.

By 1935 he wasmarried, Professor of English at the Universityof Adelaide in Australia, andhad completed his first detective novel,
Death at the President's Lodging
. Thiswas an immediate success and part of a long running series centred on hischaracter Inspector Appleby. A second novel, Hamlet Revenge, soon followed andoverall he managed over fifty under the Innes banner during his career.

After returning tothe UK in 1946 he took up apost with Queen's University, Belfast beforefinally settling as Tutor in English at ChristChurch, Oxford. His writing continued and hepublished a series of novels under his own name, along with short stories andsome major academic contributions, including a major section on modern writersfor the
Oxford History of English Literature
.

Whilst not wantingto leave his beloved Oxford permanently, hemanaged to fit in to his busy schedule a visiting Professorship at the University of Washingtonand was also honoured by other Universities in the UK.

His wife Margaret, whomhe had met and married whilst at Leeds in 1932, had practised medicine in Australia and later in Oxford, died in 1979. They had five children,one of whom (Angus) is also a writer. Stewart himself died in November 1994 ina nursing home in Surrey.

 

 

AN ARCHANGEL DAMAGED

 

 

 

 

Charles Honeybath had been out of touch with Edwin Lightfoot for years. There had been no sort of breach between the two painters, but for one reason and another the flow of sympathy between them had turned to a trickle and then dried up altogether. Reflecting on it, Honeybath (who was a reflective man) judged that here was one of the vulnerabilities of later middle age. Now one man and now the other is preoccupied with this or that; each believes that the other is turning rather dull, rather prone to slip into repetitive conversational routines sadly differing from the stimulating sparkle of yore; the intervals between meetings stretch themselves out, until eventually there has come a gap so long as to be awkward to explain. Acquaintanceships can wind themselves up more or less harmlessly in this way. But when it is a matter of friendship each party can be left feeling (quite correctly) that he hasn't behaved well.

They were, of course, different sorts of painter, Honeybath and Lightfoot, and the pattern of their careers had differed too. Neither could very sincerely have congratulated the other on the
curriculum vitae
he had elected or that had befallen him. Honeybath's had been the steadier course. As a young man he had painted portraits well, and as an old man he was painting them that way still. As he became better known his fees went up. He would have been named now by the knowledgeable as one of the top men at his job; ‘academic', perhaps – but hadn't Sir Joshua himself been that? Honeybath wasn't inspired or inspiring; he never had been either; all the more credit to him for preserving all his sensibility, all his integrity, through a long career.

Ut pictura
– it used to be said –
poesis
; you can compare paintings with poems, and mark the same wellsprings in artists as in writers of verse. Pursuing this thought, one might have said that if Honeybath was a kind of superior Robert Southey Lightfoot was a William Wordsworth of sorts – or that with a dash of Samuel Taylor Coleridge thrown in. Lightfoot's earlier career had come close to being a blaze of glory – although it wasn't, indeed, until that phase of his achievement was over that the fact had come to be widely recognized. By the time people were acclaiming ‘early' Edwin Lightfoots Lightfoot himself had declined inexplicably into a seesaw between unremarkable accomplishment and disconcerting occasional vagary. He was still technically a good painter; but when people thought of him it was as a man who had once been something else.

This was very sad, and the sadder because those marvellous early works were almost oddly scarce; were by no means abundantly displayed for the delectation of frequenters of public galleries or exposed to the cupidity of collectors in the sale rooms. Those who knew Lightfoot – and they were comparatively few, since he had become something of a recluse – were apt to declare that what hadonce been the power to project a unique vision upon canvas had declined into a fairly generous measure of personal eccentricity.

It has always been a canon of English society that the wealthier you are the more eccentric are you permitted to be. The poor are scarcely allowed to indulge in
outré
behaviour of any kind, unless it be occasionally under the influence of drink. Try anything more, and the neighbours turn first censorious and then nasty; the ‘social services' descend on you, and after them the police. The comfortably established can be comfortably odd, and the rich may comport themselves as if they still lived in that paradise of aberrancy, the eighteenth century. Edwin Lightfoot wasn't affluent, but he had always commanded rather more money than came to him from his paintings. This was the reason, no doubt, for those phases of hiscareer in which his productivity had been low. Moreover his wife, who was his junior by a good many years, was understood to have an income of her own. It had been a prudent marriage (such as artists are commonly supposed not much to favour or achieve), since the lady's brother was a picture-dealer in a substantial way, who had thereafter in effect acted as his brother-in-law's agent. All this meant that Lightfoot could mount a freakish turn if and when it took his fancy. In addition to which it must be remembered that artists are expected to be a little out-of-the-way. It wasn't so long ago that they were almost obliged to dress in awkward cloaks and enormous hats if they were to command the full confidence of their clients.

Charles Honeybath, although Lightfoot's exact contemporary, had the appearance of belonging to a later generation at least in this last regard. His attire had never been bizarre, and it had long since ceased to be casual either. When punctually each morning he left his modest little Chelsea flat (for he was a widower and childless) for his considerably more spacious studio not far off it might have been supposed from his appearance that his destination was some respectably managerial or directorial cubby-hole in the City. Not that he didn't own a certain presence. Take a second look, and you might conjecture that he was on his way to a studio, after all, where he was to be represented, sitting in an otherwise untenanted and slightly nebulous board-room, by that well-known limner of such spectacles, Charles Honeybath, RA.

We now meet Honeybath, however, on his way to Edwin Lightfoot's home. This was at the instance of Lightfoot's brother-in-law the picture pedlar, whose name was Ambrose Prout. Honeybath had run into Prout a few days before at the Savage Club, and Prout had tackled him about Lightfoot almost at once.

‘My dear Charles,' he had said, ‘I do wish you would drop in on poor old Edwin and pass the time of day. He says he hasn't seen you for months.'

‘Years, I'm afraid.' Honeybath came out with this honestly. ‘No estrangement, you know. I suppose it's simply that I grow less and less sociable.'

‘“Months” was Edwin's word. But probably he wasn't just being charitable. I'm sometimes not very sure that his sense of time is as it should be. But come, Charles! You surely wouldn't dump Edwin in a category of social duties?'

‘Certainly not – and of course I'll look him up. Are you saying that things aren't quite as they should be with him?'

‘There's nothing to be called sinister, that I can see – or not so far as his physical man goes. Hale but not hearty might express Edwin's condition. That spare type – only just short of desiccation – commonly lives to be a hundred.' Prout offered this on a faintly resentful note. He was himself a corpulent man.

‘When you say he's not hearty is it in the sense that he's sunk in gloom?'

‘Intermittently he's that. Of course I don't see him all that frequently myself. But he's also irritable and agitated. I'm afraid Melissa must find him uncommonly trying on the whole.'

Melissa was Ambrose Prout's sister and Lightfoot's wife. Honeybath had never greatly taken to Melissa, so this last reflection of Prout's didn't much disturb him. But about Lightfoot himself he was beginning to feel guilty.