I Want My MTV (37 page)

Read I Want My MTV Online

Authors: Craig Marks

 
CONAN O'BRIEN:
That a-ha video was huge when I came to LA. I was feeling detached; am I going to make it in show business? And then there's a guy being chased by World War I motorcyclists. I didn't understand what was happening.
STEVE BARRON:
A-ha didn't want to be known as the “animation band.” They loved the video, but they wanted to be known as a band with a great body of work, not a band with that one video.
 
MICK KLEBER:
Jeff Ayeroff's team at Warner Bros. made a significant number of top-notch videos. He had control over the entire image of an artist: videos, photo shoots, album covers. He had access to a very impressive talent pool. I mean, who else got Mondino to do a video for them? Warner Bros., along with Columbia, ruled the roost.
 
JEFF AYEROFF:
Jean-Baptiste Mondino was a graphic artist who could barely speak English. He sent me a video he'd done for a French singer, Axel Bauer. The song's called “Cargo de Nuit.” It was the best thing I'd seen since “Every Breath You Take.” I told him to come to California and direct videos for me. I brought him to Don Henley's house, and we had a completely wacky meeting. I could see Don's head kind of going,
What the fuck is going on?
But somehow Don, in his infinite wisdom—because he is one of the smartest men I know—goes “All right, I'm gonna go with it.” And “The Boys of Summer” is one of the best videos I ever made.
 
JEAN-BAPTISTE MONDINO, director:
We were all the children of Andy Warhol. I was a frustrated musician who was doing photography rather than guitar. Video was a way to celebrate music with imagery. For me, it was a very weak period for music. Music had never been so bad as during the '80s. The packaging was more interesting than the music itself.
I was not really into California music. I was living in Paris, and we were into a new era, more modern. But I couldn't refuse to go to LA—it was like a dream. When I got there, I was very disappointed, because there's a big difference between what I saw when I was a kid in the beautiful old Hollywood movies, and what LA's actually about. When I listened to “Boys of Summer,” there was something nostalgic—he was looking back, talking about something that he's leaving behind. The '70s were dying.
 
ANDY SLATER, manager:
I showed the Axel Bauer video to Henley, and he said, “Call that guy and send him the song.” Some video makers come from technical backgrounds—Mondino was a visionary and an artist. There's a mysteriousness to the video, an eerie abstractness. I thought of it very much as a film noir. Until that point, videos were more Hanna-Barbera. “Boys of Summer” was closer to something Godard would have made than to Hanna-Barbera. Its success opened up the possibility of doing videos that were not lowest-common-denominator, that didn't pander.
I brought Les Garland to the recording studio, and we played the record for MTV before it was even delivered to the record label. They got to know Don, and I think that served him well.
 
RANDY SKINNER:
Don Henley did not like making videos. And he didn't enjoy making “Boys of Summer.” Don's not a trusting kind of guy, either, God bless him. What Don said at the VMAs that year when he won all those awards was true: “I had no idea what they were doing, but it worked. They made Southern California look like the South of France.”
 
JEFF AYEROFF:
They used to call me the king of video. It wasn't that I was so fucking smart, I just had good taste and I understood the medium. I even helped get Chicago a hit video on MTV, “Stay the Night.” They weren't exactly a current act. I thought that if I could create a car chase in their video, and the car got wrecked, how could MTV not play it? And it worked.
 
STEPHEN R. JOHNSON:
If it wasn't for Jeff, I wouldn't have had a career in music video. I made a stop-motion animated film at USC Film School that won a bunch of awards, and Jeff saw my film. He commissioned me to direct my first video, for a god-awful band called Combonation. The singer was a great friend of mine from Kansas who I'd talked into moving to LA with me. He was the only other guy in a four-county area of Kansas who knew who Jimi Hendrix was.
Then I made the “Walk of Life” video for Dire Straits. Two videos for that song had already been made and discarded. I went on tour with them to shoot live footage, and Mark Knopfler told me he wanted the video to have sports in it. So I wrangled all this funny sports footage, with bloopers and the like. Mark's other edict was that he didn't want to be photographed from the side, because he didn't like the fact that he had a prominent proboscis. Everyone in the crew was running into each other, trying to avoid that angle.
 
SIOBHAN BARRON:
Dire Straits' manager, Ed Bicknell, asked me one day what I thought his band needed to do to get on MTV, because they weren't selling in America. I said, “Get Mark Knopfler to write an MTV-able song. And then let us make the video.” And they did: They wrote “Money for Nothing,” with the famous “I want my MTV” hook, and my brother Steve made a great video.
 
LES GARLAND:
I loved Dire Straits. In 1985, they had the
Brothers in Arms
album, and they'd released “So Far Away” as the first single and video. Pittman and I were meeting with Mo Ostin and Lenny Waronker, who ran Warner Bros., and I said, “Talk to me about Dire Straits. I'm not sure that track you guys have out now is the right one. But I think that song that mentions MTV is a smash.” They go, “You weren't offended?” I go, “Offended?
Flattered
might be a better word.”
 
STEVE BARRON:
Mark Knopfler didn't like doing videos. Dire Straits had done them before, but they showed the band playing, and Dire Straits weren't all that interesting. Jeff Ayeroff told me to go meet the band in Budapest, where they were on tour, shoot some live footage, and somehow convince Mark to do a concept video. I really wanted to use a new computer animation technology called Paintbox, which was used to do colorization in commercials and to create logos for corporations. Mark and his girlfriend and I had dinner together, I'm trying to broach the idea that MTV should be shaken up a bit. I can see he's going to say no. And luckily, his girlfriend, who was from the States, said “Wow, you're so right about that. That's exactly what MTV needs.”
“Money for Nothing” starts with Sting singing “I want my MTV,” and the song is damning to MTV in a way. That was an ironic video. The characters we created were made of televisions, and they were slagging off television. Videos were getting a bit boring, they needed some waking up. And MTV went nuts for it. It was like a big advertisement for them. It won Video of the Year at the 1986 VMAs. That was the same year as a-ha's “Take on Me,” which won Best Director and a bunch of others. I think a-ha was probably the better video.
 
ADAM ANT:
In its initial form, video was a revolution. Then MTV became worse than the record companies, and that's fucking saying something. That's harsh, but it became very decadent, like ancient Rome in a way. It was all about who you knew, and how many bottles of champagne you sent them. It began as a tough, groundbreaking, sexy, subversive, stylish thing with a sense of humor. Then it became all business.
I think the golden era ended with Michael Jackson, ironically. You got John Landis in, and you can't compete with that, because that was
big
fucking money. Then groups started to hire slick, adept filmmakers. Dire Straits was a turning point, because you had a group that visually was like a Quaalude. They didn't have a clue, so they hired someone to do an animated film, which is even
more
expensive, and that set another barrier. When Michael did videos, he was the talent, so I've got no problem with that. But when the band aren't even in it? Like that Swedish group, what are they called? A-ha. That's all postproduction.
Chapter 19
“WHY DON'T I JUST TAKE $50,000 AND LIGHT IT ON FIRE?”
THE BACKLASH AGAINST MTV
 
 
 
 
 
MTV, EVERYONE AGREES, HELPED MUSICIANS AND
their record companies make a lot of money. But not everyone who benefitted felt gratitude toward MTV. Pretty soon, record executives began to look at the channel not as a partner, but as a leech. And they picked a fight—over money, of course—MTV bosses knew they couldn't win.
 
MARK MOTHERSBAUGH:
MTV changed the architecture of being an artist. In some good ways, because all of a sudden, bands were forced to think about images. Some of them were doing great films.
The bad thing about MTV is, they decided early on that the most lucrative avenue was to let their palms be greased by record companies. They promoted whatever crap record companies put money into. It became a lot of mindless baby pictures. And it changed the way artists worked, because music got punished in the trade-off. There was a one-two punch: MTV was swiftly followed by CDs, and all of sudden instead of a well-crafted album of ten songs, you had to put all your bets on one particular song, and that's what people saw or heard from you. The rest of the CD was filler. So MTV created the all-or-nothing syndrome in pop music that made for CDs full of
shite
with, like, one strong song.
Bands had to go for gold right away. MTV got all the money you were making. They got all of your advance, because it went to a video. So you were paying for MTV's programming, instead of surviving for a year as a band. It's no accident the term “one-hit wonder” is centered around the '80s. MTV destroyed the idea of a band being able to do an album or two before they made their big opus, or before they made their strong statement. Videos changed the economics of the industry.
 
RICK RUBIN, record executive:
In some ways, MTV hurt music, in that it changed what was expected of an artist. The job changed. It became a job of controlling your image. Part of it was being camera-ready and having good concepts. Then you started to see artists break who may have been stronger visually than they were musically.
 
PAUL McGUINNESS:
There were a lot of artists for whom MTV didn't work. They would have large sums of money spent on their videos, and if MTV didn't like them, their labels would drop them and they'd have a very short career.
 
DEE SNIDER:
While MTV exposure accelerated your sales, it also shortened your shelf life. Bands had long careers in the '70s. They came to town once a year and there was no way to experience them unless you went to the show. But with MTV, you could sit in your living room and watch rock bands. MTV created an environment where a three- to five-year career was the norm.
 
PAUL FLATTERY:
On the one hand, MTV was genius. On the other, it could be seen as the great rock n' roll swindle. The record industry pours millions and millions of dollars into videos. Meanwhile, the artists, for the most part, pay for the videos. And then MTV gets them for free.
 
PAUL McGUINNESS:
They had designed a brilliant business, where they got free programming, paid for by record companies and artists, and they sold the advertising and made a lot of money. I mean, it was wonderful—for
them
. There was widespread resentment of their business model, which was regarded by many people as parasitic. But look, for U2, the bargain was fair, otherwise we wouldn't have gone along with it.
 
JEFF AYEROFF:
People who whined about the cost of music videos weren't sophisticated enough to understand that the better the video was, the more likely it was to get on MTV. The more valuable the video became to MTV, the greater the likelihood that your act could build a brand with MTV, and MTV would continue to support that brand. The greater the likelihood they supported the brand, the greater the likelihood that radio would play your act, and you'd sell lots of records. It's a simple equation, but record executives spent years not dealing with the visual side of the business.
 
STEVE LUKATHER:
MTV convinced artists and labels to give them videos for free under the guise of “We can't afford to pay you anything, and we're great promotion for you.” Everybody said, “Fine, this is never gonna work anyway.” Next thing you know, it blows up into a massive thing and they don't even pay royalties to the artists or songwriters. We got nothing, and they got to decide whose careers lived and died. We spent millions on shitty videos and they'd never get shown. It's like,
Why don't I just take $50,000 into the backyard and light it on fire?
 
JOHN SYKES:
We got 90 percent of our content for free. Which made our margins huge.
 
TOM PETTY:
I never thought it was fair. MTV was getting programing for free. I was going in the hole
millions
because I had to deliver videos to promote my singles, and they weren't giving anything back. They looked at it like airplay was your payment, but you weren't guaranteed that airplay.
 
JOE ELLIOTT:
We'd spend up to $750,000 making videos to promote an album, and MTV didn't pay us a royalty for playing our music. I always thought it was wrong, and I always will think it's wrong. We get paid for having our songs played on the radio. When, say,
The Drew Carey Show
gets rebroadcast, actors get paid residuals. When MTV played our videos hundreds and hundreds of times, we didn't get
anything
.
 
TOMMY MOTTOLA:
They built the biggest music enterprise in the history of the world off of our backs, off of our money, off of our sweat. Very cagey, very shrewd. As they began to become a powerhouse, they had the big stick, you know? We all went in and said, “Look, we're spending a lot of money on videos, and you guys are generating millions a year in profits. We need something back.” So we negotiated a big contract with them, and all the other record companies did the same, where they would pay us
X
amount of money.

Other books

Monster Republic by Ben Horton
Street Love by Walter Dean Myers
The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami
Brilliance by Marcus Sakey
Divided We Fall by Trent Reedy