Lipstick Traces (16 page)

Read Lipstick Traces Online

Authors: Greil Marcus

An Illinois woman has filed a $150 million paternity suit against pop star Michael Jackson, claiming that he is the father of her three children, she said yesterday.

“Michael is the father, Michael got me pregnant and I want Michael to pay for it,” Billie Jean Jackson, 39, said by telephone from a friend’s home in Hanover Park, a Chicago suburb . . .

The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services took custody of the children in 1985, charging the mother with lack of supervision. The children live in New York with the mother’s relatives.

Department officials refused to comment on the case, but sources said Billie Jean Jackson, who legally changed her name from Lavon Powlis, has made previous claims that other famous personalities fathered her children. None had resulted in a paternity suit, however.

—San Francisco Chronicle,
20 August 1987

Now the news was hard, and the newsbreaks never stopped: Jackson’s father and brothers, left behind so long before, forcing him to go before a
public he had preferred not to meet; various would-be promoters fighting for the right to meet the Jacksons’ demand for a $40 million guarantee; the suspense over which cities would be visited and which passed over; and, finally, the stipulation that whoever wished to attend a Jacksons concert would be required to purchase, by mail order, no less than four tickets, for $120, with no assurance that the order would result in entry, since ten orders were expected for every available ticket, meaning that, while those who lost would eventually have their money refunded (minus a service charge), it would in the meantime be held and invested in three-month notes, with all accumulated interest reverting to the Jacksons. This was real life: dollars and cents. It was also a version of what Ulrike Meinhof called Konsumterror—the terrorism of consumption, the fear of not being able to get what is on the market, the agony of being last in line, or of lacking the money to join the line: to be a part of social life. All over the country, people became happily afraid of tickets they could not afford to buy, of tickets they might not be able to buy even if they could afford them, of tickets that would seal them as everything or nothing, of tickets that, as the humiliating, exciting process began, were not even on sale.

By 6 July 1984, when the Jacksons played the first show of their “Victory” tour, in Kansas City, Missouri—thirty years and a day after Elvis Presley made his first record in Memphis, Tennessee—Jacksonism had produced a system of commodification so complete that whatever and whoever was admitted to it instantly became a new commodity. People were no longer consuming commodities as such things are conventionally understood (records, videos, posters, books, magazines, key rings, earrings necklaces pins buttons wigs voice-alteration devices Pepsis t-shirts underwear hats scarves gloves jackets—and why were there no jeans called Billie Jeans?); they were consuming their own gestures of consumption. That is, they were consuming not a Tayloristic Michael Jackson, or any licensed facsimile, but themselves. Riding a Möbius strip of pure capitalism, that was the transubstantiation.

Jacksonism produced the image of a pop explosion, an event in which pop music crosses political, economic, geographic, and racial barriers; in which a new world is suggested, where new performances can momentarily supersede the hegemonic divisions of social life. Part and parcel of such an
event is an avalanche of organized publicity, but also an epidemic of grassroots rumor mongering, a sense of everyday novelty so strong that the past seems irrelevant and the future already present. In all these ways, Jacksonism counted. Michael Jackson occupied the center of American cultural life: no other black artist had ever come close.

But a pop explosion not only links those otherwise separated by class, place, color, and money; it also divides. Confronted with performers as appealing and disturbing as Elvis Presley, the Beatles, or the Sex Pistols, with people who raise the possibility of living in a new way, some respond and some don’t—and this, if only for a moment, becomes a primary social fact. It became clear that Michael Jackson’s explosion was of a new kind.

It was the first pop explosion not to be judged by the subjective quality of the response it provoked, but to be measured by the number of objective commercial exchanges it elicited. Thus Michael Jackson was absolutely correct when he announced, at the height of his year, that his greatest achievement was a Guinness Book of World Records award certifying that
Thriller
had generated more top-ten singles (seven) than any other lp—and not, as might have been expected, “to have given people a new way of walking and a new way of talking,” or “to have proven that music is a universal language,” or even “to have demonstrated that with God’s help your dreams can come true.” To say such things would have suggested that in a pop explosion what is at stake is value: that such an event offers as its most powerful aesthetic and social gift the inescapable feeling that the fate of the world rests on how a given performance might turn out. And this was not what was happening. The pop explosions of Elvis, the Beatles, and the Sex Pistols had assaulted or subverted social barriers;
Thriller
crossed over them, like kudzu. Since
Thriller
never broke those barriers, but only made them briefly invisible, in Kansas City they once again became undeniable.

Michael Jackson’s most committed fans were black boys and girls under fifteen; in the past, he and his brothers played to audiences that were almost all black. Kansas City is 30 percent black, and as a city it looks integrated: in any given public place, both clientele and service personnel are black and white. In Kansas City’s Arrowhead Stadium, secured for a performance by the best-known black family in the world, the waiting crowd was almost all white. Following the logic of the commodity, which goes where the money
is, which will take you there whether you want to go or not, the imperatives of Jacksonism—its insistence on exchange as a mechanism for the production of value, its $30 ticket price, in $120 blocks of four—did not divide the audience of the Jacksonist pop explosion from those who chose not to be part of it; those imperatives divided those who did choose to be part of it from each other. The poor, who could come up with the money to buy a copy of
Thriller,
were out. Some of the poor went without food, clothes, or medical care to raise the $120—for many, more than a month’s rent—but, given the mail-order system, which allowed those arranging the concerts to select fans by zip code, they were off the map. The Jacksonist pop explosion was official, which meant not simply that it was validated by the president of the United States. It was brought forth as a version of the official social reality, generated from Washington as ideology, and from Madison Avenue as language—an ideological language, in 1984, of political division and social exclusion, a glamorization of the new American fact that if you weren’t on top, you didn’t exist. “Winning,” read a Nestlé ad featuring an Olympic-style medal cast in chocolate, “is everything.” “We have one and only one ambition,” said Lee Iacocca for Chrysler. “To be the best. What else is there?” Thus the Victory tour—which originally boasted a more apocalyptic title: “Final Victory.”

IT DIDN’T WORK

It didn’t work. Days before the first show, LaDonna Jones, an eleven-year-old black girl from Lewisville, Texas, wrote an open letter to Michael Jackson in care of her local newspaper, and the letter was reprinted across the country. It wasn’t fair, she said. That was all it took. It was all over. The tour managers sent LaDonna Jones free tickets, but it was too late. Hidden in a uniform that likely weighed as much as he did (dark glasses, military jacket, pants above the ankles, laceless shoes, the uniform that in the Jacksonist explosion produced not the imitators who followed Elvis, the Beatles, and the Sex Pistols, imitators who found themselves forming groups to find out what it was they had to say, but only impersonators, young men emerging from hired limousines or rushing stages to be greeted by those who knew they were fakes with screams appropriate to the real thing),
Jackson fought against the fable of the Emperor’s New Clothes, denouncing his own ticket scheme, promising to give money away, but no one ever beats a fable.

Given what it was supposed to be, the tour was dead. The show itself was dead from the first night: a stiff, impersonal, over-rehearsed supper club act blown up with lasers and sonic booms, which drew polite applause from people who had whooped as they passed through the turnstiles. In Kansas City the commodity stood on its head once again: Michael Jackson, who began his year as a dancer, turned into a piece of wood.

As the tour went on, some shows failed even to sell out; some were canceled for lack of interest. When all bills were in, the promoter had lost $18 million. On the terms established by the glare leading up to that first show, the tour went on in darkness—not in secret, but in oblivion; on the terms of the heaven of the spectacle, in hell. It ended months later, in the rain, in Los Angeles, unnoticed save for those who were there, who themselves went unnoticed by Michael Jackson and his brothers, who repeated their gestures and their patter lick for lick and line for line from Kansas City, as if nothing had happened, as if they had never been anywhere, as if everywhere was nowhere.

There were echoes; the long year was not quite over. If no longer a god, Michael Jackson remained a celebrity. In an act of celebrity noblesse oblige, along with Lionel Richie he wrote “We Are the World,” an anthem meant to raise money for African famine relief, and the song was, in its way, a masterpiece; recorded by a massed choir of pop superstars, it bypassed its putative objects, the starving Africans, and returned to those who made it. They were the world. They held out their hands: the record completed a circuit that erased all differences between performers and spectators, objectifying both in the face of objective good. With
Thriller
you could join social life simply by acknowledging it; here, through the simple act of buying the record, you could become part of the world. As the record played, the Africans ceased to starve. “As God has shown us,” Jackson and Richie wrote, not likely thinking of John of Leyden, “by turning stones to bread.”

Long after the Victory tour faded, “You’re a Whole New Generation,” the radio version of Jackson’s “Billie Jean” Pepsi commercial, remained on the air. A song about anxiety and guilt, dazzlingly produced, voices flying
through discrete layers of sound, “Billie Jean” was the most seductive record Michael Jackson had ever made; at first, his willingness to immediately transform it into an advertising jingle seemed like a slap in the face to everyone who loved it. But months later, when the constant airplay bought for the commercial allowed it not just to replace but almost to erase the original, one could hear “You’re a Whole New Generation” as a new piece of music. It was tougher: the rhythm was harsh, the production not elliptical but direct, Jackson’s voice not pleading or confused but fierce. When he sang the line, “That choice is up to you,” dramatizing the consumer’s option of Pepsi versus Coke, he made it sound like a moral choice. Altogether he communicated wholeness where “Billie Jean” had broken into fragments, anger instead of restraint, certainty in place of doubt. That only made the buried, surely slip-of-the-tongue message all the more unsettling. “You’re a whole new generation,” Jackson sang as the fade began, “you’re lovin’ what they do . . .” Wait, wait—who was this “they”?

ONE NEGATION

One negation of spectacle is panic, people thrown back on themselves: the “kind of nervousness you’ve had to experience in order to comprehend it. Somebody only has to yell one loud word on the street and the crowds scatter through the doors of houses. It’s a run for your life. At that very moment, machine-gun fire can erupt from some hidden crack, or a hand grenade is dropped from a roof and its fragments tear open your guts. The street is jammed with merchants—it’s a street fair, the kind you usually see only in the country or at folk festivals. The fellows selling sausages, who have to carry hot tin boxes, can only get through the doorways awkwardly, pushing hard. They laugh, but they’re driven by the fear of death. The machine-gun fire can rattle down the street at any moment and bring all excitement to an end. The atmosphere of a great event hovers over the city . . .”

The city is Berlin, January 1919, in the midst of the Spartacist rising, though it could be San Francisco, January 1978, in Winterland, as Johnny Rotten sings “Bodies”—that’s the feeling. The description is by Richard Huelsenbeck, from his 1920 pamphlet
Deutschland muss untergehen!
(Germany
Must Fall), subtitled “Memoirs of an old dadaist revolutionary,” though Huelsenbeck was not yet thirty. His friend George Grosz provided the illustrations: cartoons of the three pillars of the German ruling class—priest, businessman, militarist—rendered as monstrous cretins. “In those days, we were all ‘Dadaists,’ ” Grosz wrote in 1946 in
A Little Yes and a Big No,
his autobiography—even before dada he Americanized his given name out of hatred for Germany, but now, as an emigré, a new American trying to accept a society that seemed to have no language for the loathing that drove his work, he wanted to put it all behind him, to put quotes around the word, which, if it “meant anything at all, meant seething discontent, dissatisfaction and cynicism. Defeat and political ferment always give rise to that sort of movement. In a different age we might easily have been flagellants.”

On stage, railing obscenities on a woman who’s thrown her aborted fetus into a gutter
(“She
don’t want a baby that looks like that!”), then on himself, the father (“I don’t want a baby that looks like that!”), then becoming the fetus, crying back from the slime (“
MUMMY
!”), finally dissolving his tale into curses so driven they can refer back only to themselves (“Fuck this and fuck that fuck it all and fuck the brat”—it is appalling, a tidal wave of filth rises out of the gutter with the sound, you can’t get out of the way), Johnny Rotten is a flagellant—all of the flagellants’ hatred of the body is in his throat. “I drew and painted from a spirit of contradiction,” Grosz wrote, “and I tried by means of my work to show the world that it is hideous, sick and dishonest,” but Johnny Rotten is not trying: this is actually happening. And for all of his cool distance, Huelsenbeck too has a corpse in his mouth.

Other books

The Heir of Mistmantle by M. I. McAllister
Crossing Paths by Stinnett, Melanie
Amanda Scott by Prince of Danger
Night-Bloom by Herbert Lieberman
The Eagle's Vengeance by Anthony Riches