On a Farther Shore (51 page)

Read On a Farther Shore Online

Authors: William Souder

Carson tried to reassure Dorothy that there was no definite diagnosis that cancer was the cause of her back problem and that perhaps there was not a malignancy after all. But she preferred to assume it was exactly that. And if it was, the good news was that it had been caught early. “So there’s much reason for optimism,” Carson said.

But her back was not Carson’s only problem now. In the same letter she told Dorothy that one day while she’d been out Christmas shopping for Roger she started to feel funny. Suddenly everything went black, and when she came to she found that she had collapsed and toppled over a record display. Once her head cleared, Carson realized she was close to her regular clinic and went over to have her fainting spell evaluated. Everything seemed okay, she said, except for a racing heart. Now her doctors wanted her to see a heart specialist, as she had also recently complained of chest pains. Her symptoms pointed to angina on top of cancer. Carson tried to laugh it off for Dorothy’s benefit. “Well, I may do something about it one of these days, but if it is angina it is certainly a mild case and I’m not running up hills or anything like that.”
But four weeks later she did see a cardiologist—who said it was unmistakably angina, “a classical case.”

The changes this meant for Carson were significant. A hospital bed was sent to her home in Silver Spring and she was ordered to stay in the house. There was to be no stair climbing. Carson told Dorothy she was henceforth forbidden to do anything that someone else could do for her. The reason for these dramatic restrictions, Carson said, was that it turned out she had a well-understood but rare form of angina that most often struck while she was sleeping and not as the result of any exertion. At the same time, Carson’s doctor said exercise probably wouldn’t help her condition, either. She told Dorothy she now expected her life to be “pretty tame.”

In early February 1963, Carson told Dorothy her new routine was to go back to bed as soon as Roger was off to school each day—and that she often stayed there without bothering to get dressed, although this tended only to increase her weariness.
Dorothy wrote back, wondering how Carson managed to take it all.
Carson reminded her that it was Dorothy who made things easier, though she also hinted at more difficult times ahead. “Because of you there has been far more joy in the happy things,” Carson wrote, “and the hard spots have been more bearable. And so it will be in time to come, I know.”

Inevitably, Carson began to think about her legacy, as it now seemed undeniable that her time was growing short. Like any writer, she hoped that her work would outlive her.
She told Dorothy that the past decade—the time when they had known each other—had been crowded with sorrow and illness, but also with “everything I shall be remembered for.”

Less than two weeks later, Carson had more bad news.
Two new tumors had appeared, one by her collarbone and another higher up on her neck. She tried to reassure Dorothy that radiation usually knocked out these kinds of tumors—but she allowed that this latest setback was not likely to be her last. She said she could not pretend to be “lighthearted” about any of this and mainly tried not to think about it. This wasn’t easy, as the discovery of new cancer had been accompanied by an increase in her chest pains. She said her confinement to bed was “strange.” She was afraid to do so much as pull up the blinds or even pick up the cat. Carson said she had told almost nobody how ill she was and, as a result, wasn’t getting the kind of attention she would have received in the hospital. Being home this way, not knowing how to decrease her physical activity any further, was dreadfully lonely.

Only days after this, Carson wrote to Dorothy again, telling her that the “arthritis” she’d been complaining about in her left shoulder for two months now looked like more cancer in the latest round of X-rays. The new radiation treatments were extended to include this
area. Her doctor warned her that any similar pain she felt in other joints in the future needed to be looked at promptly.

Carson tried to stay upbeat: “
The main thing I want to say, dear, is that we are not going to get bogged down in unhappiness about all this,” she wrote. “We are going to be happy, and go on enjoying all the lovely things that give life meaning—sunrise and sunset, moonlight on the bay, music and good books, the song of thrushes and the wild cries of geese passing over.”

Houghton Mifflin and Carson had worked out arrangements for her appearance on
CBS Reports
. Carson got plenty of advice from the publicity people at Houghton Mifflin about how she should present herself on television.
Don’t allow yourself to be shot at an angle “from the knees down,” she was told, and wear little or no makeup, especially lipstick, as it tended to look black on black-and-white film. The publisher’s main concern, though, was that Carson avoid looking “too stern.” Even though the subject was a serious one, she should smile a little now and then, as it would “relax” her face and keep her from appearing as grim as her message. Of course, it was the message that was most important to Houghton Mifflin, but the publisher also wanted their much-loved author to reveal a little of her naturally gentle nature. Her scientist self would come through on its own.

But months after interviewing Carson, CBS rescheduled the program several times and everyone got nervous again, wondering if CBS, which was also talking to Carson’s critics, might be allowing the program to tip in the direction of the pesticides industry. In November 1962 the publicity department at Houghton Mifflin warned Carson she should brace herself for harsh treatment on the show. The program’s producer, a man named Jay McMullen, had a reputation for being slow and methodical—and Houghton Mifflin thought that could mean their “friends in the chemical business” might in the end make a strong defense of pesticides.

Privately, Carson had reason to think CBS reporter Eric Sevareid was favorably disposed to the case she’d made against pesticides in
Silent Spring
, as she believed he shared her views on the sometimes
careless nature of human progress. Carson had clipped and saved a newspaper account of a CBS Radio news broadcast Sevareid had done in 1958 about proposals for sending rockets—and someday men—to the moon.
Sevareid believed that “winning” the moon would mean losing that magical relationship humanity had always had with it—though he understood that many people younger than himself would not share his feelings. “
There must come a time in every generation,” Sevareid said on the broadcast, “when those who are older secretly get off the train of progress, willing to walk back to where they came from, if they can find the way.”

While an ailing Carson waited for
CBS Reports
to air—it was finally scheduled for the evening of April 3, 1963—she was showered with accolades, winning awards from the Garden Club of America, the American Geographical Society, and the National Audubon Society. The Geographical Society’s prize, called the Cullum Medal, had never before been presented to a woman. Carson was also elected to the American Academy of Arts and Letters.
But she confided to Paul Brooks that of all the honors she’d been given, the one that had been the most touching was being elected the first member of a newly formed chapter of Phi Beta Kappa at her alma mater, the Pennsylvania College for Women—which was now called Chatham College.

In early March 1963, Carson and Dorothy began to feel their time together was running out. Carson said her days were now unremittingly difficult. Any movement at all caused her pain—in her back and ribs mainly—and she was beset with constant nausea that made working all but impossible.
Torn between wanting Dorothy to know everything and wanting to protect her from the worst news, Carson confided that she’d held on to a letter she’d written about a month before after a night of such intense chest pains that she’d thought she might not live until morning. The thought of Dorothy, bereft and having had no chance to say goodbye, caused her to write down “what is in my heart” so that Dorothy might have something of her if the end came without warning.

In the weeks since, Carson thought her angina improved enough
that she was not likely to die suddenly after all. Now she wanted to make sure they were completely honest with each other: “
All that is most wonderful in our relationship has been based on that spontaneous outpouring of thoughts and feelings. We both know that my time is limited, and why shouldn’t we face it together, freely and openly?”

Carson said it was ironic that other people had to accept the many honors being bestowed on her, and that all her opportunities to travel to interesting places had to be turned down. Idly she thought about getting away to Myrtle Beach—Roger would love it—though it would mean flying down and renting a car, as the drive from Silver Spring now seemed unimaginable. Carson, whose moods were becoming more erratic, said it was often hard to keep going from one day to the next, but as long as she could stay at least a little busy she could manage—maybe even get well.


I shall feel better soon, I’m sure,” she wrote. “The present great weariness is due to the very heavy radiation I’ve had, undoubtedly. And the ‘misery’ in my side will presumably disappear. Sometimes I wish I had nothing to do, but probably it is better to keep my mind occupied.”

Carson tried to keep up with scientific and environmental news. In December 1962 she’d been pulled into a fight over the use of dieldrin against the white-fringed beetle in Norfolk, Virginia. Earlier in the fall, larval grub worms of the beetle—a voracious and indiscriminate plant eater—had been discovered in the area, and the Virginia Agriculture Department responded with a plan to spread nine thousand pounds of granular dieldrin over three thousand acres of mostly residential lawns and gardens.
Stories about the program in the
Virginian-Pilot
ignited public outrage. The news that dieldrin was already being heavily applied to golf courses and private lawns in Norfolk deepened divisions in the community.

Norfolk’s new city library said it could not keep up with demand for
Silent Spring
. Eventually, Virginia’s governor, Albertis S. Harrison, Jr., got involved. He said he’d read
Silent Spring
, but that weighing the risk of going ahead with the dieldrin program against the economic
damage that could result if the beetle went unchecked, the treatment plan should proceed. Even Carson’s old outfit, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, agreed, telling the
Virginian-Pilot
that dieldrin was “extremely destructive to wildlife” but stopping the white-fringed beetle was essential and there was nothing else to be done.

After a lawsuit failed to obtain an injunction, the program began in March when a turbine blower towed behind a jeep started spreading dieldrin throughout the city. Interviewed by the
Virginian-Pilot
, Carson said an application rate of three pounds per acre for dieldrin was “quite heavy.” She was dismissive of official claims that the treatments were safe and would be carefully supervised. “They always say that,” she said. Carson reminded everyone that many of the most egregious misuses of pesticides she’d uncovered in researching
Silent Spring
had occurred in government-run programs.

Carson took a more academic interest in another below-the-radar environmental issue in early 1963. It was a subject she’d been concerned about for years—a pattern of warmer temperatures and rising sea levels. In March, a group called the Conservation Foundation convened a small, private scientific conference to consider the possibility that the burning of fossil fuels was causing a rise in heat-trapping atmospheric carbon dioxide. A report from the conference was moderately alarming—and a preview of things to come.


It seems quite certain,” the report read, “that a continuing rise in the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide is likely to be accompanied by a significant warming of the surface of the earth which by melting the polar ice caps would raise sea level and by warming the oceans would change considerably the distributions of marine species including commercial fisheries.”

The report said the “biogeochemical” regulation of the earth’s climate was not well understood but that in general the climate was stable over long periods of time. The natural “buffering mechanisms” that made it so now appeared to be inadequate to moderate the effects of changes to the atmosphere caused by human activity. This
was reason for serious concern, maybe not at the moment but in the years to come: “
The effects of a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide are world-wide. They are significant not to us but to the generations to follow. The consumption of fossil fuel has increased to such a pitch within the last half century that the total atmospheric consequences are matters of concern for the planet as a whole.”

CBS Reports:
“The Silent Spring of Rachel Carson” aired on April 3, 1963.
Among those watching was President Kennedy, who was urged to catch the program by his science adviser Jerome Wiesner. Kennedy and Wiesner were both doubtless interested in how the government’s reaction to
Silent Spring
would be represented by their often-wavering Secretary of Agriculture Orville Freeman. Carson, too, was curious about how she’d come off on the show—
she told Dorothy she hoped not to seem like an “utter idiot.” She said she’d been in a state of exhaustion during the two days of filming in Silver Spring, and that her voice had been unnaturally husky.

But while Carson looked to be in less than vigorous health, her even, unemotional delivery was brilliant and a stark contrast to the performance of her primary opposite number in the program’s point-counterpoint format—the supercilious Robert H. White-Stevens. The program opened with shots of pesticides being sprayed on trees and crops and through neighborhoods as children trailed along in the fog from the trucks, while Carson read from
Silent Spring
the passage calling pesticides “biocides.” Then came White-Stevens:

The major claims in Miss Rachel Carson’s book
Silent Spring
are gross distortions of the actual facts, completely unsupported by scientific experimental evidence and general practical experience in the field. Her suggestion that pesticides are in fact biocides, destroying all life, is obviously absurd in light of the fact that without selective biological activity these compounds would be
completely useless. The real threat, then, to the survival of man is not chemical but biological—in the shape of hordes of insects that can denude our forests, sweep over our croplands, ravage our food supply, and leave in their wake a train of destitution and hunger, conveying to an undernourished population the major diseases and scourges of mankind.

If man were to faithfully follow the teachings of Miss Carson we would return to the Dark Ages, and the insects and diseases and vermin would once again inherit the earth.

Other books

Rigadoon by Louis-ferdinand & Manheim Celine
El maestro y Margarita by Mijaíl Bulgákov
Dad Is Fat by Jim Gaffigan
Too Close to Home by Lynette Eason
Time-Out by W. C. Mack