Authors: Peter Huber
At first these paeans to frontier America seem strange, coming as they do from Orwell's left-wing pen. But the old America Orwell admires is really quite like the new democratic-socialist England he dreams of: a land of natural, unmachined abundance, where minds are free because food, jobs, and all other basic essentials are there for the taking. Freedom cannot possibly involve commerce, banks, insurance, merchants, or private property. Freedom simply does not include traditional “economic liberty” It does, however, include what socialists always include: enough wealth in every man's pocket to cover all basic necessities and wealth spread around evenly enough to ensure social equality. Peace, freedom, flowers, happiness, and art flourish when economic times are so good that people don't have to worry about money at all. One can almost hear Orwell, who loved biblical allusions, reading the lesson from Matthew 6:28: “Behold the lilies of the field,
they toil not, neither do they spin, yet even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.”
And who will tend the lilies in Orwell's socialist garden? Well, the government, of course. The Ministry.
The door was opened silently by a small, dark-haired
servant in a white jacket. A second man followed behind, with a look of vapid wonder on his face.
“Come in Burgess, come in.” O'Brien's expression was grim, but he spoke the words gently He rose deliberately from his chair and walked across
the soundless carpet. His visitor clutched his hands together in uncertain embarrassment.
O'Brien moved closer, so that his solid form
towered over the smaller man. The
seconds marched past. Burgess was standing silently, his opaque black eyes fixed unblinkingly at a point somewhere below O'Brien's collar. The man was solid Party timber, O'Brien thought, the kind of man who got a servile pleasure from lumbering deferentially forward when something was wanted by the Party, the kind of man who would suck up whenever he had the chance to suck up, whose hatred would always turn into a sort of
cringing love at the first smile. Circus dogs jumped when the trainer cracked his whip, but the really well-trained dog turned
his somersault when there was no whip.
“Burgess, thank you. Thank you for coming. I have asked you to come here becauseâ”
O'Brien paused, realizing for the first time
the vagueness of his own motives.
He did not in fact know what kind of help he expected from Burgess. He went on, conscious that his words must sound remarkably tentative, coming as they did from a high-ranking member of the Inner Party.
“We believe there may be some kind of conspiracy to sabotage the network. The Party would like you to investigate.” O'Brien gave a faint smile.
Burgess took his cue. He spoke eagerly, saliva flicking from his lips, his fat cheeks wobbling.
“If there's anything going on, Blythe's behind it! I've said it for years: it's time for the complete and final
elimination of Blytheism.” This last sentence was barked out very rapidly, all in one piece, like
a line of type cast solid. “And now he's after the network, eh? What we need are sterner measures against thought-criminals and saboteurs!” His head was thrown back a little, and because of the angle at which he was sitting, his spectacles caught the light and presented to O'Brien
two blank discs instead of eyes. “What lessons do we learn from such treachery?
The lessons . . .”
“Burgess,” said O'Brien quietly. “Shut up.”
A look of fear flitted across the man's face.
“The Party knows you're a good man, Burgess. This is not a test of Party loyalty.” O'Brien turned back toward his chair and sat down heavily. A cough rumbled in his chest, and he suppressed it. “There really does seem to be some sort of problem with the network. We need to find out what it is. And if there is a problem, we need to fix it.”
O'Brien gestured toward a chair, and Burgess sat with an air of abject deference. He carefully did not look at the delicate, polished surface of the desk. To stare covetously at such a luxurious item would be suspect in a Party member. Exactly right, thought O'Brien. The man's whole life was playing a part. Burgess understood it would be dangerous to drop his
assumed personality even for a moment.
“I need first to understand a bit more about these telescreens,” O'Brien continued gently. “Perhaps you can help me.” He resettled his
glasses on his nose, then continued. “Most telescreens are on permanently, of course.
Tell me first, Burgess, how is it that members of the Inner Party are able to switch off their telescreens?”
Burgess brightened visibly. Something like eagerness moved across his face.
“Ah, that's really quite straightforward. It's in the manual, in fact. I can leave you a copy. You just approach the screen, and carefully say: âCOMM-ONE-CLOSE, COMM-TWO-CLOSE,' quite slowly and clearly, and that does it. Marvelous, really. It took me a while to get the hang of it too,” he added as a confidential afterthought.
For a moment O'Brien was certain he would send Burgess straight to the cells in the basement of the Ministry. It would be worth itâworth silencing one last pedantic fool, whatever the cost. But the thought passed. The Party needed Burgess, at least for the moment.
“Yes, yes, I know about that. You'll notice that I've shut down my own unit.” O'Brien gestured toward the dark screen on the wall. “I also know that âCOMM-ONE-OFFICE, COMM-TWO-HOME' connects me from here to my office in the Ministry. What I'm trying to understand is why some units work like this and others don't.”
O'Brien paused again, to let the thought register. “The screens in Victory Square, for exampleâthe ones around the monument. No one can turn those on or off. From room 101 at the Ministry, we watch the people in the square. The people in the square of course see the Big Brother channelânews from the front, that sort of thing. What is it exactly that makes those telescreens work differently from mine? Are they different units?”
“No, they're the same units,” Burgess replied slowly. “We install them differently. It's all part of the installation. It's in the manual, of course. The one B.B. wrote for us.”
“And how exactly do the installations differ?”
Burgess twitched, and his face drooped. “Well, it has to do with the blue box, you see. After the screen's mounted, we use the box. To get the unit started, you understand. This part's really quite complicated. But it's in the manualâall in the manual.” Burgess brightened. “I could get you a copy. There aren't many, but I don't suppose we'd
have much trouble locating one for someone in your position.” He chuckled hoarsely.
O'Brien felt the anger rising in his throat. Again he swallowed the urge to obliterate the man at once. “That might be helpful. Yes, certainly, I'm sure it would be. But do fill me in a bit more first. My men in the Ministryâhow exactly do they go about selecting which screen they're going to monitor? Suppose, for example, I was at the Ministry now, and I wanted to check up onâ” O'Brien glanced down at his deskâ“on comrade Blair, let us say, a chap who's been having a spot of trouble with crimethink lately. Now if I were in the Ministry at this very moment, how would I arrange to take a quick look round Blair's living room?”
Burgess looked gloomy. “It would be done with the blue box, I think. I'm really not exactly sure. It's a very specialized application.”
“Then how about the offices?” O'Brien gestured again at his own telescreen. “My unit here connects up to the Ministry. I can also link up with Cooper, my personal secretary. Most people in the Ministry can connect with one or two other offices. How do you take care of that?”
“I thinkâ” Burgess hesitated for a long moment. “I think we look after that part during the installation.” He stopped again, deep in thought. “They send us the order forms, you see. There are two numbers on themâit's two most of the time at least. Then we follow the manual. That's extremely complicated. But toward the end we use the blue box and enter the two numbers. Sometimes it's more than two.” He looked uneasy. “I once did a unit in the Ministry with six!” he added brightly.
O'Brien sat silently. He found himself thinking of Orwell. Orwell had sat in this same room, in the same chair now occupied by Burgess. The memory came back to O'Brien with a sort of crystalline clarity, the kind of vivid memory of things long past that he had often had of late. Orwell had been trying to persuade O'Brien to approve the new network. He'd gone on and on about the technical details. And unlike this fool Burgess, Orwell had known what he was talking about. He had loved the gadgets, loved their complexity, loved the whole network. Orwell had an inventive faculty; he
invented machines as naturally as
the Polynesian islander swam. He also had a doggedly empirical habit of thought. Orwell had been a singlethinker, no doubt about it.
“These manuals that you useâ” O'Brien hesitated again. “I wonder if there might be some simpler explanation of it all. Something for a nontechnical chap like me. Or do you supposeâbetter stillâthat we might locate one of the engineers who helped to write it? Someone from the '80s, perhaps?”
Burgess gazed back expressionless. “We could look. Can't say I've ever met any of the old guard. Most of them turned out to be saboteurs. Until the manuals were perfected those types did almost anything they liked with the network.” He spoke with increasing vigor, and the spittle began to gather at the corners of his mouth. “Completely unreliable, most of them. Not really Party men at all. Probably Blythe . . .”
“Thank you Burgess.” O'Brien spoke quietly, but his words again carried an unmistakable note of warning. Burgess froze, leaning forward on his seat, his arm stuck in mid-gesticulation.
“I know exactly what you mean,” O'Brien continued. “Still, if we could find one of the old engineers, we might perhaps be able to extract something useful from him. Find out a bit more about this blue box you use, ask him how it all fits together.” O'Brien resettled his weight in the chair. Burgess stared with obsequious concentration. “Perhaps you could pursue the matter. My aide at the Ministry will see to it that you are given whatever assistance you might need.”
“Certainly, certainly,” Burgess replied with sickly enthusiasm. “Be happy to. I'll get right to it. And whoever it is that's causing the troubleâwell, I'm sure we'll catch the swine. After all, B.B. has saidâ”
Burgess caught O'Brien's look, and his mouth snapped shut. After only the shortest pause, O'Brien held out his hand. Burgess leapt to his feet. A moment later, he was gone.
A man of small intellect, O'Brien reflected, but tenacious, of unquestioned loyalty. He'd plod along, dig through the archives and the records, and in the end find what was needed. This kind of investigation required no real originality.
O'Brien
turned back to the writing table with its green-shaded lamp and the wire baskets deep-laden with papers. His glance fell on the memorandum he had received the day before about Blair, and Winston Smith's elusive diary.
O'Brien works in the Ministry of Love, which houses the Thought Police. Nearby stands the Ministry of Truth, which spews out propaganda and falsifies history. Orwell of course despises ministerial Love and Truth more than anything else, except perhaps ministerial Peace. He knows that the Ministries of Love, Truth, and Peace deliver nothing but hate, lies, and war. When it comes to the marketplace of ideas, Orwell is as laissez-faire as Adam Smith.
The Ministry of Plenty, however, is another matter. Such a ministry really could deliver Plentyâor so Orwell firmly believes, until the day he dies. Collectivism, Orwell knows, is far more efficient than the free market.
How does he know? First, the economics of “the machine” require it. As we've seen, the process of washing crockery, making an aeroplane, or building an atom bomb is “so complex as to be only possible
in a planned centralised society.” When a new invention threatens profits, capitalists suppress it “as ruthlessly as the flexible glass mentioned by Petronius.” “Establish Socialismâremove the profit principleâand the inventor will have a free hand. The mechanisation of the world . . .
could be enormously accelerated.” One can almost hear Orwell add: “Indeed, by 1984 . . .”
Second, Orwell cites modern economic experience. Capitalism, Orwell
observes time and again in his many writings,
is “in decay,” “
dissolving,” “
disappearing,” “
doomed,”
and “dead”âand
it “will not return.” Businesses are collapsing into monopoly all around, and the rot of
monopoly spreads year by year. “[T]he march of progress is going in the direction of always bigger and nastier trusts,”
Orwell writes in 1928. “The combines” have squeezed the grocer and
the milkman out of existence. “[P]rivate capitalismâthat is, an economic system in which land, factories, mines and transport are owned privately and operated solely for profitâdoes not work.
It cannot deliver the goods.” “There is little question now of averting a collectivist society,”
Orwell announces in 1940. “[A] return to small-ownership is obviously not going to happen
and in fact cannot happen.” “I don't believe economic liberty has much
appeal any longer,” he writes elsewhere. “A collectivised economy is bound to come,” he announces to the world
in a BBC broadcast. Indeed, by 1984 . . .
Orwell's third piece of evidence, and for a while his trump card, isâ of all peopleâHitler. Orwell sets out this argument for the efficiency of central planning in a strange little book published in 1941,
The Lion and the Unicorn.
Orwell loves socialism and hates fascism, but he believesâin 1941, at leastâthat fascism “borrows from Socialism just such features as will make it efficient.” Hitler's conquest of Europe, says Orwell, “was a physical debunking of capitalism.” A fascist state, like a socialist one, “can solve the problems of production and consumption. . . . The State simply calculates what goods will be needed and does its best to produce them. . . . The mere efficiency of such a system, the elimination of
waste and obstruction, is obvious.” This isn't sarcasm. Orwell really believes it.