Read Psycho USA: Famous American Killers You Never Heard Of Online
Authors: Harold Schechter
G
IVEN THE MORE OR LESS IMMUTABLE TRAITS OF HUMAN NATURE, INCLUDING OUR
innate potential for violently antisocial behavior, it’s no surprise that certain kinds of crimes recur over the centuries. During the 1920s, America was transfixed by the case of the brassy Queens housewife Ruth Snyder, who persuaded her lover, a mousy corset salesman named Judd Gray, to help murder her unwanted husband. At the time, the case (which inspired the classic noir novel and film
Double Indemnity
) was seen as emblematic of the age, a symptom of the “anything goes” ethos and breakdown of traditional moral values that characterized the Roaring Twenties. As it happened, however, a crime almost identical to the Snyder-Judd case occurred in America a full century earlier. Its perpetrators were a pair of illicit lovers, a flighty young female named Elsie Whipple and her lovesick patsy, Jesse Strang.
B
ORN IN POVERTY
and raised “to hard labor,” Strang was a thirty-year-old drifter who—after deserting a wife and two children in Dutchess County, New York—led a footloose life out west before making his way to Albany in 1826. By then, he was going under the name Joseph Orton. Severely nearsighted, he wore bifocal eyeglasses
that endowed him with a learned appearance wildly at variance with his actual intelligence. Acquaintances called him “Doctor.”
It was in the early part of August 1826, just weeks after showing up in Albany, that he first set his myopic eyes on Elsie Whipple, disporting herself in a barroom. At his initial glimpse of the vivacious, golden-haired beauty, “the flame of lawless love” (as an early chronicler put it) was kindled in Jesse’s bosom. Assuming from her free-and-easy behavior that she was “a young, sprightly girl,” he remarked to a companion: “I would not mind passing a night in her chamber.” He was surprised to learn that Elsie was in fact a married woman, wed to one John D. Whipple, a well-to-do canal engineer nine years her senior. Still, his companion assured him, “he need not despair.” After all, many another wife married to an older husband had taken a young lover.
A few weeks later, by either chance or design, Jesse took a live-in job for $13 a month at the very place where Elsie and her husband boarded: Cherry Hill, the mansion owned by the Albany blueblood Philip Van Rensselaer, Elsie’s uncle by marriage. For a time, “no particular intimacy took place” between the two future conspirators. Eventually, however, Elsie—undoubtedly perceiving Jesse’s barely suppressed hunger for her and his susceptibility to sexual manipulation—declared her passion for him, her unhappiness in her marriage, and her willingness to run off with him. She had never believed that “there was such a thing” as true love, she informed him, “until it was awakened by the beauty of his eyes”—a quality evidently magnified by Jesse’s thick-lensed spectacles.
Elated, Jesse proposed that they elope at once and resettle in Ohio, where they could live under assumed names. He “would be as a husband to her,” he declared, “and take the best care of her that was in his power.” Elsie consented, though she insisted that they would need at least $1,200 (roughly $26,000 in today’s money) to establish a new life together.
She first suggested that Jesse “forge a check on the bank in Whipple’s name” for the requisite sum, a plan that Strang quickly vetoed since he could barely write. She then came up with another proposal. If her husband died, she stood to inherit more than enough money to make their dream come true. Unfortunately, John Whipple was in excellent health. The obvious solution, Elsie explained, was for Jesse to do away with her husband.
Though Jesse was not overburdened with moral scruples, he was shocked by the
suggestion and adamantly refused. Elsie responded in the time-honored way of her ilk—by casting aspersions on his manhood. Clearly, Jesse was not as “bold” as another of her suitors, a fellow who had offered to dispose of John Whipple “if she would consent to have him.” With his paramour threatening to withhold her favors from him and bestow them on another man, it wasn’t long before the weak-willed Jesse relented.
Repairing to the nearest apothecary shop, Jesse purchased an ounce of powdered arsenic, explaining to the druggist that his house was overrun with rats. He then brought the poison home to Elsie, who stirred a heaping teaspoon into a steaming cup of tea. Before proceeding further, the “abominable pair” swore a solemn oath, pledging that, even if subjected to the most extreme forms of duress, they would never, under any circumstances, betray each other. Elsie then brought the poisoned tea out to her husband, who drained the cup. For some reason, however—either because the arsenic was defective or because John Whipple’s “constitution was uncommonly strong”—the dose had no effect.
Strang tried again, this time buying arsenic from a different druggist. Again, however, Whipple, who seemed weirdly immune to the poison, imbibed a dose with no ill effects.
Apparently assuming that someone else might have better luck, Jesse next approached the family cook, a female slave named Dinah Jackson, and offered her $500 to poison Whipple. In stark contrast to Strang—regarded by dint of his color as her social and moral superior—Washington stoutly refused. “I won’t sell my soul to hell for all the world,” she declared. Several other efforts to hire paid assassins came to nothing.
In the meantime, Jesse and Elsie continued their adulterous affair, sometimes slipping off to an inn in a neighboring town and putting up for the night under the guise of husband and wife. It was during one of these assignations that Elsie proposed a new plan. Her husband was about to undertake a trip to Vermont and had to be at the stagecoach depot early Monday morning. Her idea was that Jesse waylay Whipple on his way into town and “shoot him or take an axe or club and knock out his brains.”
When Jesse convinced her that such an ambush was too risky, Elsie came up with yet another scheme: that Strang steal one of Mr. Whipple’s pistols and, from a vantage point outside the house, shoot her husband through his bedroom window as he sat at his table.
Jesse objected that he had never fired a pistol in his life and was “as likely to kill
another member of the family as the one intended.” He thought, however, he might be able to do the job with a “two-barreled rifle.” With $20 provided by Elsie, he embarked on a shopping trip to Albany. Finding that a double-barreled weapon was beyond his means, however, he purchased a rifle instead.
Back home, Jesse spent some time perfecting his marksmanship in the woods. Elsie—worried that her husband’s window might deflect the bullet—provided him with several panes of glass for his target practice. She promised to leave her husband’s window curtains open on the fateful night, so that Jesse would have an unobstructed shot. On the day before the planned assassination, they sealed their unholy compact with a final bout of adulterous sex in a hayloft.
The following evening, Monday, May 7, 1826, at around 9:00 p.m., Jesse climbed to a spot atop a shed not far from John Whipple’s second-floor bedroom. Through the window, he could see his target seated at his desk. Carefully aiming at a spot just under Whipple’s arm, he pulled the trigger, firing the rifle—as he later confessed—“with as much composure as if I had shot at a deer.”
“Oh Lord!” cried Whipple, and tumbled from the chair, dead.
After disposing of his rifle deep in the woods and “readjusting his clothes,” Jesse strode to the main road and returned to his lodging, pretending that he had just gotten back from a trip to Albany. Informed that Mr. Whipple had been shot, he hurried up to the room where his victim was lying. At his first glimpse of the blood-soaked corpse, he turned so deathly pale that his reaction would later be taken as “the first symptom of guilt.”
As he and Elsie had prearranged, Jesse informed the authorities that he had recently seen a pair of canal workers prowling near the house and believed that these roughnecks—supposedly disgruntled employees of Whipple’s—might be the culprits. It wasn’t long, however, before Jesse’s alibi fell apart and his affair with Elsie was uncovered. Both were promptly arrested.
For a while, Jesse stoutly maintained his innocence. Confronted with overwhelming evidence, however—including the testimony of the gunsmith who had sold him the murder weapon—he finally broke down and confessed. Despite their solemn pledge of mutual loyalty, Jesse immediately tried to pin the blame on Elsie, insisting that she had masterminded the crime and offering to testify against her in exchange for a pardon. Rebuffed by the district attorney, Jesse stood trial in July 1847. The jury took fifteen minutes to find him guilty and sentence him to hang.
Three days later, Elsie went on trial. In an age that perceived women as the “tender
sex,” incapable of cold-blooded murder, Elsie, for all her “weak, frivolous, and wanton” behavior, was widely and sympathetically viewed as a susceptible young female who had been led astray by an “artful and designing villain.” The jury acquitted her without leaving their seats.
A
FESTIVE CROWD
of more than thirty thousand spectators—“persons of every age and description”—showed up to watch Jesse Strang hang on Friday, August 24, 1827. While most came from “adjacent towns,” many had traveled “from places of even one hundred miles distance.” Of this “vast multitude,” “fully one third were females.”
To maintain order, “at least one thousand soldiers, including several uniformed companies from distant parts of the county of Albany, attended.” Despite this heavy military presence, the scene was so raucous that public executions were thereafter banned in Albany.
The scaffold had been erected in a little valley called Beaver Hill Hollow, situated “a short distance south of the Capitol.” It was, wrote one observer, an ideal site for such a spectacle: “surrounded by a number of hills capable of affording to each spectator a perfect view of the gallows; and they were crowded to their summits, strangers continuing to flock to the spot from all quarters.”
At precisely one o’clock, Strang emerged from the jailhouse, attended by his spiritual advisor, the Rev. Mr. Lacey. He was “dressed in a long, white robe, trimmed with black, black gloves and shoes, and wearing on his head a white cap, also trimmed with black. Preceding him in a wagon, drawn by black horses, was his coffin.”
Ascending the scaffold with “firm and undaunted steps,” he made a brief address to the spectators, “expressing his contrition for having committed the awful crime for which he was about to suffer the just sentence of the law. He hoped the unsuspecting and the guilty would take warning by him and shun all evil ways, unnatural passions, and sinful lust which had proved his ruin and caused his disgraceful death. He hoped that his death might be received as an atonement for his sins and that the spectators would return peaceably to their homes with their hearts softened by what they had witnessed and dedicated to virtue and truth.”
After a final, fervent prayer, Strang bid a tearful farewell to the Rev. Mr. Lacey, who “commended him to his Maker.” The sheriff, a fellow with the curious name of Ten Eyck, then stepped forward and adjusted the noose around Strang’s neck. In a
final display of fortitude that won the admiration of the crowd, Jesse “himself drew the cap over his face.” Unfortunately, Sheriff Eyck botched his job. When the trap was sprung, the knot, which should have been positioned beneath Jesse’s left ear, slipped to the back of his neck. As a result, Strang’s “neck did not break and his sufferings were apparently long and painful.”
He hung for a full twenty minutes before he was cut down and placed in the waiting coffin. For the sake of his siblings and “poor afflicted father,” who had attracted much public sympathy, Jesse’s cadaver was spared the usual postmortem fate of executed criminals: public dissection in an anatomy school. Instead, his remains were loaded aboard a steamboat and conveyed to his family home in Dutchess County, “there to receive the usual rites of Christian burial.”
Two years after Jesse Strang’s abject, agonizing death, Elsie Whipple—then living in New Brunswick, New Jersey—remarried.
Though the murder at Cherry Hill didn’t inspire any famous works of fiction or film, it made a deep impression on one of our greatest authors, Nathaniel Hawthorne.
Given his sense of “Puritanic gloom” (as his friend Herman Melville called it)—his obsession with sin, guilt, and the darker urges of the human heart—it is unsurprising that Hawthorne was addicted to murder pamphlets and trial reports throughout his life. One of his favorite childhood books was the seventeenth-century crime collection The Triumphe of God’s Revenge Against the Crying and Execrable Sin of Murther, a volume he reread so compulsively that he completely wrecked its binding. His craving for such prurient fare was so intense that during his stint as American consul to Liverpool during the mid-1850s, he had a friend ship him regular batches of penny papers so that he could keep up with the grisly goings-on back home. One of the last memories Hawthorne’s son Julian had of his father was of the aged man “sedulously leafing through an enormous volume of trial reports.”
Hawthorne was a particular fan of James Faxon’s 1833 volume, The Record of Crime in the United States, an early true crime anthology containing (as the subtitle put it) sketches of “the most notorious malefactors who have been guilty of capital offenses and who have been detected and convicted.” Among the cases detailed in the book was that of Jesse Strang.
In July 1838, Hawthorne, according to his journal, made a special trip to Boston to view a “show of wax-figures, consisting almost wholly of murderers and their victims.” Among the most lifelike of the statues were, in Hawthorne’s words, those of “Strang and Mrs. Whipple who together murdered the husband of the latter.” To judge by the entry, Hawthorne considered writing a “satire” based on the exhibit, but evidently abandoned the idea.
[
Sources: The Authentic Confession of Jesse Strang, Executed at Albany, Friday, August 24, 1827, for the Murder of John Whipple; as Made to the Rev. Mr. Lacey, Rector of St. Peter’s Church, Albany; From the Time of Strang’s Imprisonment down to the Hour of His Execution. Published to the World at Strang’s Dying Request! Together with the Account of His Execution and Conduct Under the Gallows. (New York: E. M. Burden & A. Ming Jr., 1827); Louis C. Jones, Murder at Cherry Hill: The Strang-Whipple Case, 1827 (Historic Cherry Hill, NY: A Cherry Hill Publication, 1982).
]