Stop the Coming Civil War: My Savage Truth (13 page)

There are also inevitably limits of some sort on who can receive cancer treatment under Obamacare plans. Buffalo’s Roswell Park Cancer Institute is not covered by eleven of the sixteen Obamacare insurers in New York State. St. Louis’s Siteman Cancer Center is included in a number of insurance plans, although none of them are included in Obamacare. Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City is not included in Obamacare plans underwritten by Humana.
¹⁴

Obamacare was sold as health insurance that would take care of people who have pre-existing medical conditions that would have caused them to be denied insurance before the ACA was passed. What’s happening, though, is the exact opposite. As many people who are sick are finding out, they’re not covered by their Obamacare policies. It’s healthy people who are covered.

Are you in good health and want to get a “free” mammogram or a “free” colonoscopy? No problem. Are you sexually active and want “free” contraceptives? Obamacare welcomes you. You’ve got them.

Have cancer and want to get the best treatment available? It’s a completely different story.

Do you know what happened when Dr. Katherine Albrecht tried to get treatment for her Stage 3c breast cancer through Obamacare in the state of New Hampshire? Her doctors told her to “get her affairs in order.” They told her to resign herself to death. Her private insurer, though, took a different approach. It paid for her to go to Dana-Farber Cancer Center in Boston, and later to Weill Cornell Breast Cancer Center. She was treated successfully and recovered. When Obamacare
became law, her private policy was canceled. She was one of the fortunate ones who received treatment before Obamacare became law.
¹⁵

It’s not only hospitals that are disappearing from health insurance plans. UnitedHealth dropped thousands of doctors from its network of providers. The insurer explained that the reduction in the number of doctors was because Medicare Advantage plans for the elderly were drastically underfunded by Obamacare, with cuts in payments from the government reduced to the point where medical practices and hospitals were experiencing cash flow problems. Doctors in at least ten states have been notified that they are no longer in UnitedHealth’s provider networks.
¹⁶

Obamacare is the president’s signature piece of legislation for a reason: It’s designed to accelerate the transformation of this country into a socialist dictatorship. It’s one of the signs we’re heading toward civil war in this country between Americans who support the Constitution and the freedoms we have enjoyed throughout our history and the forces aligning behind a federal government that is rapidly assuming control over every aspect of our lives.

Let me tell you about an Obama connection that is not a coincidence.

For the Obamacare rollout, Obama worked with the same public relations specialists who also did the publicity for Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. Celinda Lake and American Environics, the leftist pollster who advised the Obama campaign to make contraception for women one of the central issues in the 2012 presidential campaign, offered data that was useful. But the driving force in developing the strategy behind branding Obamacare was the Herndon Alliance. They’re the
ones who came up with the now infamous line, “If you like your health-care plan you can keep it.”

The Herndon Alliance is a radical leftist group that has partnered in many projects with radical leftist, anti-American groups including MoveOn and La Raza.
¹⁷
But here’s the punch line. Herndon had used the same reimaging strategy that they used for Obamacare before. The same American Environics that provided support for the Obamacare project had created and maintained Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez’s public image.

Still don’t think Obama visualizes a Venezuelan scenario for America?

Obama’s health insurance legislation was never designed to be a brokerage for insurance plans that were provided by private insurance companies. It’s my opinion that the ultimate goal of the Affordable Care Act is to eliminate the private health-care insurance market altogether and bring another large portion of our economy under a single payer: the dictatorial socialist government that is assuming power in the United States.

I see it as one more element in this president’s attempt to destroy our capitalist economy and turn us into a member state of a globalist government ruled by a political and economic elite.

The act was passed into law illegally, and without a single Republican vote. Democrats rigged the election of Minnesota senator Al Franken in order to get a majority, then skirted the Constitution and used obscure congressional work-arounds to pass a law without even getting approval from the House.

The Obama administration defended the law, saying that it in no way represented a tax. Then Chief Justice Roberts rewrote the legislation by deciding it was a tax and not an attempt to regulate interstate commerce. Since any legislation
that creates a tax must originate in the House of Representatives, and since the ACA hadn’t originated in the House, the law immediately became unconstitutional.

After he had overstepped his constitutional limits, Roberts then disregarded the Constitution a second time when he voted to uphold the law.
¹⁸

Roberts’ swing vote in favor of Obamacare plunged America into one of the darkest, most dangerous periods in our history. The fact that ObamaScare legislation was allowed to stand by the chief justice of the Supreme Court marked the legitimizing of Obama’s ongoing takeover of the United States of America.

The NSA has been spying on U.S. senators, members of the House of Representatives, and journalists for over a decade, according to NSA whistleblower William Binney. If they can spy on the Pope and foreign leaders like German chancellor Angela Merkel, why shouldn’t we assume Obama didn’t spy on Roberts, find something he’s hiding somewhere, and blackmail him into giving Obamacare the Supreme Court’s seal of approval?

Am I allowed to ask the question?

Has anyone in the media analyzed it from this perspective?

I haven’t heard it.

By the time the health-care law was ready to be implemented, it pitted Republicans against Democrats. It further divided the Republican Party into factions, with strong Tea Party conservatives like Ted Cruz and Utah senator Mike Lee standing up against the administration’s takeover, while establishment Republicans like Karl Rove, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham wanting only to maintain the status quo. They presented no alternative to the Democratic agenda, because they’re actually in collusion with the Democrats. Divide and
conquer. The current administration’s goal is to create chaos and further the ongoing U.S. economic collapse, leading us to civil war, a socialist society, and enslavement to an elitist world government.

I know that’s difficult to accept, but you have to realize we’re talking about the world of the leftist agenda. Let me give you an example of how the left works to help you understand their ultimate goals.

In the late 1960s, two radical leftist Columbia University professors, Richard Cloward and his wife, Frances Piven, developed a plan that had a strikingly similar goal to that of the current administration. It entailed signing up as many low-income Americans as possible—primarily American blacks—to the welfare rolls. They believed the financial burden of this would crash America’s economy. It was part of a grand socialist revolution scheme they wanted to create in America.
¹⁹

The strategy didn’t achieve its ultimate goal of economic collapse, but it nearly bankrupted New York City, which had 150,000 welfare cases in 1960, and nearly 1.5 million ten years later. Like so many leftist movements, it also added members to the permanent African-American underclass that the Democrats have created in the United States. It contributed to destroying blacks’ independence and their initiative to work and helped keep them enslaved in the inner-city ghettoes the liberal left had razed and rebuilt as part of its Great Society legislation of the 1960s.

In my opinion, the administration’s intent with the Affordable Care Act is no different than the intent of Cloward and Piven forty years ago, except that this time the left is not just targeting African-Americans. The current administration’s aim is to complete the collapse of the American economy and
social order. This collapse would pit those who have lost their livelihoods and property against the political and economic oligarchy that is assuming control in the United States. Ultimately, the goal of the Obama administration might well be to make us vulnerable to a takeover of the United States by a globalist elite.

As I see it, Obamacare has five major objectives: the massive redistribution of wealth; the collection of vast amounts of personal data; the elimination of jobs and ultimate destruction of the middle class; the expansion of graft and corruption to further cripple social order; and a cash windfall for the president and his cronies.

If we’re ever going save ourselves from total ruin, first we have to fully understand what we are being subjected to. Here, I explain the five major goals I believe Obamacare is meant to achieve.

The left is the enemy of the middle class.

Obamacare targets the middle class, small business owners, professionals, individuals, and families whose annual incomes are in the $60,000-to-$175,000 range. These middle-class Americans are finding that under Obamacare they can no longer keep the health insurance policies they were happy with, as they were once promised by the president. The policies they were instructed to buy had premiums that were in many cases higher than the ones they had, with annual deductibles that ran as much as $10,000 more than they were paying.

They are the victims of the
purposeful incompetence
of Obamacare.

By eliminating the individual health insurance market, the administration is using Obamacare to bring into being a massive redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the poor. Deprived of health care they can’t afford, the middle class will become totally dependent on the federal government for their medical care.

What was needed was a rationale. Enter MIT’s Jonathan Gruber. I can’t believe the level of insanity coming out of once-great universities. Gruber is the genius who said: “Genetic lottery winners should pay more for their health insurance.”
²⁰

You understand how twisted this Gruber is, right? Saying that our health-care system is discriminatory, that if you’re healthy you should pay more, and if you’re sick you should pay less.

The problem is that there are any number of reasons you might be sick.

I’ve tried to take good care of myself. I’ve lived a healthy lifestyle. So don’t you think I should pay less for my health care? Shouldn’t people who live right, who don’t take drugs, who don’t have hyper-multiple sexual partners, shouldn’t they be rewarded instead of ObamaScare charging me more so people who haven’t lived healthy lifestyles can pay less?

I say people who indulge in risky behavior should pay more. I don’t want to pay for their behavior.

I engage in the riskiest behavior on earth. I sleep eight hours a night. I eat a clean, healthy diet. I don’t smoke. I don’t do drugs.

I am a Normo-path.

I don’t sleep with fifty people a week. We’re not allowed to mention that promiscuity spreads sexually transmitted
diseases? For instance, one of the consequences of providing contraception is that it can encourage people to engage in risky behavior. So with Obamacare we get to pay for people who get STDs because of their own irresponsible behavior?

There used to be a discount on your health insurance if you didn’t smoke. You paid less for your health insurance if you followed a healthy lifestyle. And if you smoked, they wouldn’t give you insurance, or they’d charge you more. They’d put you in a risk pool. With Obamacare there are no risk pools.

Everybody’s in the risk pool now.

Do you think private insurance companies wanted to lose money on you because you didn’t have any self-control? Only the government is that perverse.

So this guy Gruber from MIT says,
You’re the genetic lottery winner because you’re healthy.

I watch my health. I take care of myself. And I should pay for an idiot who’s injecting heroin? I should pay for a guy who smokes? I should pay for a prostitute riddled with disease?

I don’t want to pay for them. That’s how I feel. You pay for your own liver transplant if you drank like a fool. I’m not in favor of people who want the middle class, folks who live with morals, scruples, and integrity, to pay for those who live debauched lives. But that’s where the collective wealth of America’s once great middle class is headed.

Every American who is forced to go onto the Healthcare.gov website and enter personal information is immediately handing over their personal data—from their Social Security numbers,
to their incomes, to their private health histories—to the enemy. But that’s only what you give them voluntarily. Thanks to the raft of documents released by Edward Snowden, we now know that the NSA can gain access to your computer through such things as Windows error messages and your purchasing of apps. Even the popular Angry Birds app can give the NSA a portal into your privacy.
²¹
So if they can get into your computer and e-mail through apps and error messages, why can’t they get in through a website application that they administer? Think about that.

As a report from the General Accounting Office explains, the information they gather goes to two main destinations. First it’s channeled into the Federal Data Services Hub. The mission of the Data Services Hub is to pull together into one place your personal data from the IRS, the Departments of Homeland Security and Defense, the VA, the Social Security Administration, Medicaid, the Peace Corps, and any other government agency with which you’ve had even a passing relationship. Once it has the information, it distributes the data “to state and third party data sources needed to verify consumer-eligibility information.”
²²
In other words, your most private and personal information is allowed to leak out into the web, where it’s fair game for any identity thief or political adversary.