The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (143 page)

Amongst the most disturbing component contained within Article 6 of the EU Directive, is that it strictly prohibits information about diseases being treatable by nutrients and calls for future supplement dosage restrictions.
 
Such is the power and influence of Big Pharma! 

Today the EU pays an annual fine of $150 million to maintain its ban on the US hormone-fed beef.
 
Clear evidence that WTO rules put free-trade interests of agribusiness above national health concerns.
 
Meanwhile, a flood of new GMO products are surreptitiously being introduced into EU agriculture.
 
Monsanto, Syngenta and other GMO multinationals have already taken advantage of lax national rules in new EU member countries such as Poland to get the GMO ‘foot-in-the door.’
 
Pro-GMO governments, such as that of Angela Merkel in Germany, abdicate any responsibility by claiming they are only following WTO ‘orders’, which is exactly the line taken by the FSA and strangely reminiscent of another organisation in history coincidentally from the same part of the world, whose followers used exactly the same defence.

Powerful agribusiness multinationals such as Monsanto, Dow Chemicals and DuPont are working through the WTO-backed Codex Alimentarius Commission in their determination to overrun national or regional efforts to halt the march of GMO.

NHF & ANH resistance to Codex will potentially be little more than an inconvenience to the prime movers behind this pernicious global agenda … unless and until such time as there is a wider realisation that the organic farming and natural health industries may soon be little more than a memory. 

Meanwhile, Big Pharma and Big Food have a very well prepared strategy to ensure the success of the Codex agenda.
 
But our challenge is to demonstrate that no corporate strategy can be effective against the universal desire to retain the basic human right to food and health freedom. 

Contrary to popular belief Codex Alimentarius is neither a law nor a policy.  It is in fact a functioning body, a Commission, created by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organisation under the direction of the United Nations.
 
The confusion in this regard is largely due to statements made by many critics referring to the ‘implementation’ of Codex Alimentarius as if it were legislation waiting to come into effect.  A more accurate phrase would be the ‘implementation of Codex Alimentarius guidelines,’ as it would more adequately describe the situation.

Codex is merely another tool in the chest of the Elite whose goal is to create a one world government in which they wield complete control.
 
Power over the food supply is essential in order to achieve this.
 
As will be discussed later, Codex Alimentarius will be ‘implemented’ whenever guidelines are established and national governments begin to arrange their domestic laws in accordance with the standards set by the organisation.

The existence of Codex Alimentarius as a policy-making body has roots going back over a hundred years.
 
The name itself, Codex Alimentarius, is simply Latin for ‘food code’ and directly descended from the Codex Alimentarius Austriacus, a set of standards and descriptions of a variety of foods in the Austria-Hungarian Empire between 1897 and 1911.  This set of standards was the brainchild of both the food industry and academia and was used by the courts in order to determine food identity in a legal fashion.

Even as far back as 1897, nations were being pushed toward harmonisation of national laws into an international set of standards that would reduce the barriers to trade created by differences in national laws.  As the Codex Alimentarius Austriacus gained steam in its localised area, the idea of having a single set of standards for all of Europe began to pick up support too.
 
From 1954-1958, Austria successfully pursued the creation of the Codex Alimentarius Europaeus (the European Codex Alimentarius) and almost immediately the UN directed FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) sprang into action when the FAO Regional Conference for Europe expressed the desire for a global international set of standards for food.
 
The FAO Regional Conference then sent a proposal up the chain of command to the FAO itself with the suggestion to create a joint FAO/WHO programme dealing with food standards.

The very next year, the Codex Alimentarius Europaeus adopted a resolution that its work on food standards be taken over by the FAO.
 
Then in 1961, it was decided by the WHO, Codex Alimentarius Europaeus, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the FAO Conference to create an international food standards programme known as the Codex Alimentarius.   In 1963, as a result of the resolutions passed by these organisations two years earlier, Codex Alimentarius was officially created.

Although created under the auspices of the FAO and the WHO, there is some controversy regarding individuals who may or may not have participated in the establishment of Codex. Some anti-Codex organisations have asserted that Nazi war criminals, Fritz ter Meer and Hermann Schmitz in particular, were the principal architects of the organisation.
 
Because many of these claims are made with only indirect evidence or no evidence at all, one might be tempted to disregard them at first glance.
 
However, as the allegations gain more and more adherents, Codex has attempted to refute them.
 
In the Frequently Asked Questions section of its website, the question, ‘Is it true that Codex was created by a former war criminal to control the world food supply?’  Is answered by stating;

“No. It is a false claim. You just need to type the words ‘Codex Alimentarius’ in any search engine and you will find lots of these rumours about Codex.
 
Usually the people spreading them will give no proof but will ask you to send donations or to sign petitions against Codex. 
Truthful information about Codex http://www.codexalimentarius.net  is found on the Internet - there is nothing to hide from our side - we are a public institution working in public for the public - we are happy if people want to know more about our work and ask questions.

There is an official Codex Contact Point

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/members.jsp in each member country who will be pleased to answer your questions on Codex.”

But, as one can see from the statement above, Codex’s response does very little to answer this question beyond simply disagreeing with it.
 
While it is true that many individuals who make this claim provide little evidence for it, the presentation of the information does not necessarily negate its truthfulness.
 
In fact, Codex offers its own website as a source for accurate information about the organisation; yet, beyond the FAQ section, there is nothing to be found that is relevant to the “war criminal” allegations; furthermore the Codexalimentarius.net website is virtually in-decipherable, almost to the point of being completely useless.

In the end, this response raises more questions than it answers.
 
This is because Codex, if it wished to do so, could put these rumours to rest by simply posting a list of the individuals and organisations that funded or played an integral role in its creation.
 
However, it does nothing of the sort.
 
Beyond mentioning the FAO and the WHO, we are completely unaware of who or how many other individuals and organisations participated in the creation of Codex Alimentarius.

The ‘war criminal’ claims centre around the chemical conglomerate known as I.G. Farben which was made up of several German chemical firms including, BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and AGFA, that merged together.
 
It was essentially the manufacturing wing of the Third Reich and was the engine behind the Nazi war machine.
 
The company provided the vast majority of explosives and synthetic gasoline used for the military conquest and murder of millions. It also manufactured the now infamous Zyklon-B gas used in the gas chambers.  Not only that, but it was influential in the conducting of experiments on concentration camp victims. Indeed, camp victims were often purchased outright at the behest of the company for the express purposes of testing by several different branches of the company, particularly Bayer and Hoechst.

Without I.G. Farben, the German war efforts simply could not have been sustained.
 
During the Nuremberg war trials, the tribunal convicted 24 board members and executives of the company and dissolved it into several different daughter companies.
 
Namely, BASF, Hoechst (later to be known as Aventis), and Bayer.
 
By 1951, virtually all 24 of these executives were released, including Fritz ter Meer and Hermann Schmitz.

Ter Meer had been a member of the I.G. Farben executive committee from 1926-1945 and also a member of the working committee and the technical committee as well as a director of the infamous Section II.
 
He was also the ambassador to Italy given full power by the Reich Minister for armaments and war production and was the industrialist most responsible for Auschwitz.
 
Schmitz was also a member of the I.G. Farben executive committee from 1926-1935, and was chairman of the board and ‘head of finances’ from 1935-1945.
 
He was also head of military economics and a member of the Nazi party.
 
Both men were found guilty by the Nuremberg war tribunal in 1948, yet Schmitz was released in 1950 and Ter Meer in 1952.

After all this, Schmitz was appointed board member of the German bank of Berlin West in 1952 and in 1956, the honorary chairman of the board of Rheinish steel plants.
 
Ter Meer, however, was even more successful.
 
Upon his release, he was appointed board member of Bayer in 1955 and, in 1956 was appointed chairman.
 
In the years following, he would take on many additional roles such as chairman of the board of Theodore Goldschmidt AG, deputy chairman of the board of Commerzbank and Bank-Association AG, as well as a board member of the Waggonfabrik Uerdingen, Duesseldorger Waggonfabrik AG, the bank association of West Germany and United Industrial Enterprises AG.  These are documented connections for both of these men.
 
Indeed, Ter Meer’s’ connections to the pharmaceutical firm Bayer earned him a foundation named in his honour, the Fritz Ter-Meer Foundation.  Through all of this however, this writer could not confirm that either Ter Meer or Schmitz had direct connections to the creation of Codex Alimentarius.

However, Codex does nothing to dispel the allegations besides simply disagreeing with them and the connections are not at all implausible.
 
Codex is very secretive about its beginnings, as evidenced on its website where it only states that it was created at the behest of the FAO and the WHO.
 
It is highly unlikely that such an organisation would be created without the assistance, input, and even funding of privately owned international corporations.
 
Thanks to both the anti-Codex community and Codex Alimentarius itself, there is no evidence that documents which individuals or corporations were involved in its establishment.
 
However, there are other ties that lend more credence to the belief that war criminals played a role in the creation of Codex.

A substantial part of the control mechanism used as a tool for centuries by the ruling Elite to facilitate the keeping of the masses in their places has always been mainstream religion (as opposed to spirituality).
 
Through Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and all the other ‘isms’ and their minor variations and offshoots, we have been managed very effectively and efficiently and thus prevented from gaining access to the real truths of the Universe.

Indeed, through the ages and even today to a large extent, religious dogma has been largely responsible for the suppression of real truth, real history and even real science in an attempt to prevent the common herds from gaining knowledge of both themselves as spiritual beings and the Universe around them.
 
Of course, that kind of knowledge would be far too dangerous to the control systems and the Elite power-base to allow it to become widespread.
 
The only way that the few can control the many is by deception and deception on an unimaginable scale.

All mainstream religions teach us (broadly speaking) that there are only two courses open to us after death, paradise or the eternal fires of hell.
 
Allegedly, only those of us who are good citizens and obey the religious edicts and civil laws and believe in the one true God (choose any one) will live forever in paradise and the rest will be condemned to a burning pit of fire or similar, for eternity with no hope of redemption.
 
In bygone days when the masses were totally uneducated and illiterate, one can only imagine the impact that this edict had upon the way they conducted their lives.
 
Living in fear of eternal damnation at every turn is a difficult psychological burden to bear, but a wonderfully simple expedient by which the ruling classes, through their brain-washed priests and religious hierarchy could keep the ‘great unwashed’ in check.

I do not mean to condemn or vilify those many genuine, decent and caring people who follow these religions.
 
Many people find comfort in their religion and there are also caring and charitable people of all religions who are serious about and adhere to their religious values, some of which to be fair, do advocate noble, humanitarian practices.
 
However, it is the imposition of rigidly-structured, restrictive controls by the religious hierarchies that is responsible for the misery and ‘imprisoning’ of the minds of their adherents that I find problematic.

In order to comprehend the basis upon which all religions were founded, we need to go back in time to the Babylonian and Phoenician eras.
 
All the major religions stem from one great premise – sun worship, the original ‘religion’ of most of the ancients.
 
If one can understand the original sun worship and its attendant symbolism, then it is possible to understand the basis of all current religious beliefs.
 
All sun symbolism has a basis in the Zodiac, representing as it does the Earth’s annual journey around the sun.
 
As we may see from the diagram below, the Zodiac can be bisected horizontally and vertically and this I believe is the true origin of the cross symbolism in Christianity.

Many pre-Christian deities had their ‘birthdays’ as 25th December because of this symbolism.
 
The winter solstice occurs on the 21st/22nd December, the point at which the sun is at its weakest in the Northern hemisphere and the point at which the sun had symbolically died according to ancient traditions.
 
By the 25th December each year, three days later, it became observable that the sun had been ‘re-born’ and had re-commenced its climb back to its absolute zenith on 21st / 22nd June the following year.

Thus, the ancient peoples regarded the sun’s ‘birthday’ as 25th December, the day it was born again, Jesus died on Good Friday, which incidentally has no fixed, definitive date and was resurrected (re-born) three days later on Easter Monday.
 
The Christian Christmas festival is purely and simply a Pagan festival reconstituted, as are they all.
 
Below is a shortlist of other religious ‘deities’ among many others, whose claimed birthday is 25th December:

Horus (c. 3000 BCE)

Osiris (c. 3000 BCE)

Attis of Phrygia (c. 1400 BCE)

Krishna (c. 1400 BCE)

Zoroaster/Zarathustra (c. 1000 BCE)

Mithra of Persia (c. 600
BCE
)

Heracles (c. 800 BCE)

Dionysus (c. 186 BCE)

Tammuz (c. 400 BCE)

Adonis (c. 200 BCE)

Hermes

Bacchus

Prometheus

It is a perhaps little known fact that all the major religions tell us the same stories, myths and legends, albeit using slightly different characters and names which nevertheless are often recycled for mass consumption.

For example, of the above list of commonly known ‘deities’, many are attributed similar legends to that of the Jesus ‘myth’ or even the myth of Moses.
 
They are variously and collectively said to have died and been resurrected three days later, become great teachers at the age of 12, been purveyors of ‘miracles’ some of which are also attributed to Jesus, such as the turning of water into wine, walking on water and the healing of the terminally ill.
 
They all had 12 disciples, fasted for forty days and forty nights in the wilderness, were born of a virgin birth and died at the age of thirty three, whilst yet others were found in a basket in water and brought up by royalty as with the Moses story etc. etc and on and on with broad similarities too numerous to mention.

“There is nothing holy about the Bible, nor is it ‘the word of God.’
 
It was not written by God-inspired saints, but by power-seeking priests.
 
Who but priests consider sin the paramount issue?
 
Who but priests write volumes of religious rites and rituals?
 
No one, but for these priestly scribes sin and rituals were imperatives.
 
Their purpose was to found an awe-inspiring religion.
 
By this intellectual tyranny they sought to gain control and they achieved it.
 
By 400 BC, they were the masters of ancient Israel.
 
For such a great project they needed a theme, a framework and this they found in the Creation lore of more knowledgeable races.
 
This they commandeered and perverted – the natural to the supernatural and the truth to error.
 
The Bible is, we assert, but priest-perverted cosmology.”
 
Lloyd Graham, ‘Myths and Deceptions of the Bible’

The Christian religion itself was finally shaped into the format with which we are so familiar today at the conference at Nicaea (in what is now modern-day Turkey) in 325AD.
 
This was achieved amongst much conflict, violent disagreement and compromise until eventually ‘modern’ Christianity was born and evolved from this event.
 
The conference was also characterised by its lies, distortions and misinformation on a grand scale – all in the name of creating a control mechanism for the masses which was acceptable to all the minor creeds and offshoots of the previous broad base of the religion.
 
In short, Nicaea was a PR exercise and an attempt to sanitise and package for broad consumption, a system of ‘belief’ that had previously been unacceptable or even unpalatable to so many.

“Real consciousness is as much an anathema to religion as critical thinking is to academia.”
 
Robert Bonomo, activistpost.com 13th October 2011

Please understand that the main function of organised religion is to destroy spirituality and to prevent people from making the connection to the consciousness of who we are as a species and as an individual.
 
Given that religions were created in the first place to enslave the population, is it any surprise that they attempt to destroy everything for which they purport to stand?

"Today, a young man on LSD realised that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration and that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively.
 
There's no such thing as death, life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
 
...Now here's Tom with the weather."
 
Bill Hicks, US comedian, 1961-1994

The humour in this pithy observation is derived totally from the last sentence.
 
The preceding two sentences appear to be the serious observations of someone from outside the mainstream viewpoint expressing a truly spiritual view of the mysteries of life.
 
However, this illusion is shattered as we realise the words are being spoken by a mainstream TV anchor-man character as a link to the next section of the show.
 
The absurdity of this should be apparent to all – it could never happen in the ‘real world’ as mainstream TV anchors do not says things of that nature and thus the joke is born from the contrast between reality and fantasy, as is much of our humour.
 

Bill Hicks was a unique comedian.
 
Acid-tongued, uncannily accurate observations of life combined with deep spiritual knowledge and beliefs and a rare understanding of political realities, made him a huge draw with audiences all around the USA and eventually Britain.
 
Of course, he never became a ‘super-celebrity’, a mega-star.
 
For that to happen one must espouse views that totally conform to the mainstream otherwise one will never be allowed a platform for this ‘subversive’ approach.
 
Hicks sadly died of cancer at the age of 32 and the world lost a true student of spirituality, a deep-thinking intellectual and someone who was able to bring an alternative view of the world to the masses through his insightful comedy shows.
 
He constituted an extreme danger to those who try to enslave us all, as he had a huge following who hung upon his every word.
 
In the light of this fact, could his cancer possibly have been natural or is it just feasible that it was given to him deliberately.
 
There is no doubt that the technology to do this, exists and is often used against the overt opponents of the New World Order.
 
Hicks also said, very aptly…

“The world is like a ride in an amusement park.
 
And when you choose to go on it, you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are.
 
And the ride goes up and down and round and round.
 
It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly coloured and it's very loud and its fun – for a while.
 
Some people have been on the ride for a long time and they begin to question, is this real or is this just a ride?
 
And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, ‘Hey - don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because, this is just a ride’... And then we kill those people.”

Some years ago, the famous actor Larry Hagman took part in an experiment to check-out the effects of the (highly illegal) Class A drug, LSD (LySergic acid Diethylamide).
 
After imbibing the substance and waiting for its effects to manifest, he took an orange from the kitchen and cut it open.
 
Its cellular structure was pulsing and it looked to him as though the cells were alternating between life and death, which seemed perfectly natural to him in his now highly conscious, altered-state.
 
Looking up from his scrutiny of the pulsating orange, he saw his reflection in a mirror on the wall.
 
He too, was pulsating.
 
Cells were dying, whilst others were in the process of being re-born.
 
An intricate picture of every cell in constant motion became apparent and he realised that he was a constant flow of energy as indeed, was everything else.
 
The scope of this realisation widened with his conviction that: "I was part of everything and everything was part of me.
 
Everything was living, dying and being reborn."