The Guinea Pig Diaries (7 page)

My interview with Blanton is unlike any other I’ve had in fifteen years as a writer. Usually, there’s a fair amount of butt kissing and diplomacy. You approach the controversial stuff on tippy toes (the way Barbara Walters once asked Richard Gere about that
terrible, terrible
rumor). With Blanton, I can say anything that pops into my mind. In fact, it would be rude not to say it. I’d be insulting his life’s work. It’s my first taste of Radical Honesty, and it’s liberating and exhilarating.

When Blanton rambles on about President Bush, I say, “You know, I stopped listening about a minute ago.”

“Thanks for telling me,” he says.

I tell him, “You look older than you do in the author photo for your book,” and when he veers too far into therapyspeak, I say, “That just sounds like gobbledygook.”

“Thanks,” he replies. “That’s fine.”

Blanton has a temper—he threatened to “beat the shit” out of a newspaper editor during the campaign—but it hasn’t flared tonight. The closest he comes to attacking me is when he says I am self-indulgent and
Esquire
is pretentious. Both true.

Blanton pours himself another bourbon and water. He’s got a wad of chewing tobacco in his cheek, and when he spits into the fireplace, the flames crackle louder.

“My boss says you sound like a dick,” I say.

“Tell your boss he’s a dick,” he says.

“I’m glad you picked your nose just now,” I say. “Because it was funny and disgusting, and it’ll make a good detail for the piece.”

“That’s fine. I’ll pick my ass in a minute.” Then he unleashes
his deep Texan laugh: heh, heh, heh. (He also burps and farts throughout our conversation; he believes the one-cheek sneak is “a little deceitful.”)

No topic is off-limits. “I’ve slept with more than five hundred women and about a half-dozen men,” he tells me. “I’ve had a whole bunch of threesomes”—one of which involved a hermaphrodite prostitute equipped with dual organs.

What about animals?

Blanton thinks for a minute. “I let my dog lick my dick once.”

If he hadn’t devoted his life to Radical Honesty, I’d say he was, to use his own phrase, as full of crap as a Christmas turkey. But I don’t think he is. I believe he’s telling the truth. Which is a startling thing for a journalist to confront. Generally, I’m devoting 30 percent of my mental energy to figuring out what a source is lying about or hiding from me. Another 20 percent goes into scheming about how to unearth that buried truth. No need for that today.

“I was disappointed when I visited your office,” I tell Blanton. (Earlier he had shown me a small, cluttered single-room office that serves as the Radical Honesty headquarters.) “I’m impressed by exteriors, so I would have been impressed by an office building in some city, not a room in
Ass Crack, Virginia
. For my essay, I want this to be a legitimate movement, not a fringe movement.”

“What about a legitimate fringe movement?” asks Blanton, who has, by this time, had three bourbons.

Blanton’s legitimate fringe movement is sizable but not huge. He’s sold 175,000 books in eleven languages and has twenty-five trainers assisting in workshops and running practice groups around the country.

Now, my editor thinks I’m overreaching here and trying too
hard to justify this essay’s existence, but I think society is speeding toward its own version of Radical Honesty. The truth of our lives is increasingly being exposed. Sometimes it’s voluntary— think Facebook pages or transparent business deals. Sometimes it’s involuntary—think Googleable political contributions or just ask Christian “Do Not Enter My Sightline” Bale. For better or worse, we may all soon be Brad Blantons. I need to be prepared. [Such bullshit.—
Ed.]

I return to New York and immediately set about delaying my experiment. When you’re with Blanton, you think, Yes, I can do this! The truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. But when I get back to bosses and fragile friendships, I continue my lying ways.

“How’s Radical Honesty going?” my boss asks.

“It’s okay,” I lie. “A little slow.”

A couple of weeks later, I finally get some inspiration from my friend’s five-year-old daughter, Alison. We are in Central Park for a playdate. Out of nowhere, Alison looks at me evenly and says, “Your teeth are yellow because you drink coffee all day.”

Damn. Now that’s some Radical Honesty for you. Maybe I should be more like a five-year-old. An hour later, she shows me her new pet bug—a beetle of some sort that she has in her cupped hands.

“It’s napping,” she whispers.

I nudge the insect with my finger. It doesn’t move. Should I play along? No. I should tell her the truth, like she told me about my teeth.

“It’s not napping.”

She looks confused.

“It’s dead.”

Alison runs to her father, dismayed. “Daddy, he just said a bad word.”

I feel like a miscreant. I frightened a five-year-old, probably out of revenge for an insult about my oral hygiene. I postpone again—for a few more weeks. And then my boss tells me he needs the essay ASAP.

I start in again at dinner with my friend Brian. We are talking about his new living situation, and I decide to tell him the truth.

“You know, I forget your fiancee’s name.”

This is highly unacceptable—they’ve been together for years; I’ve met her several times.

“It’s Jenny.”

In his book, Blanton talks about the thrill of total candor, the Space Mountain-worthy adrenaline rush you get from breaking taboos. As he writes, “You learn to like the excitement of mild, ongoing risk taking.” This I felt.

Luckily, Brian doesn’t seem too pissed. So I decide to push my luck. “Yes, that’s right. Jenny. Well, I resent you for not inviting me to your and Jenny’s wedding. I don’t want to go, since it’s in Vermont, but I wanted to be invited.”

“Well, I resent you for not being invited to your wedding.”

“You weren’t invited? Really? I thought I had.”

“Nope.”

“Sorry, man. That was a mistake.”

A breakthrough! We are communicating! Blanton is right. Brian and I crushed some eggshells. We are not stoic, emotionless men. I’m enjoying this. A little bracing honesty can be a mood booster.

The next day, we get a visit from my wife’s dad and step-mom.

“Did you get the birthday gift I sent you?” asks her stepmom.

“Uh-huh,” I say.

She sent me a gift certificate to Saks Fifth Avenue.

“And? Did you like it?”

“Not really. I don’t like gift certificates. It’s like you’re giving me an errand to run.”

“Well, uh . . .”

Once again, I feel the thrill of inappropriate candor. And I feel something else, too. The paradoxical joy of being free from choice. I had no choice but to tell the truth. I didn’t have to rack my brain figuring out how to hedge it, spin it, massage it.

“Just being honest.” I shrug. Nice touch, I decide; helps take the edge off. She’s got thick skin. She’ll be okay. And I’ll tell you this: I’ll never get a damn gift certificate from her again.

I still tell plenty of lies every day, but by the end of the week I’ve slashed the total by at least 40 percent. Still, the giddiness is wearing off. A life of Radical Honesty is filled with a hundred confrontations every day. They’re small, but relentless.

“Yes, I’ll come to your office, but I resent you for making me travel.”

“My boss said I should invite you to this meeting, although it wouldn’t have occurred to me to do so.”

“I have nothing else to say to you. I have run out of conversation.”

My wife tells me a story about switching operating systems on her computer. In the middle, I have to go help our son with something, then I forget to come back.

“Do you want to hear the end of the story or not?” she asks.

“Well . . . is there a payoff?”

“Fuck you.”

It would have been a lot easier to have kept my mouth closed and listened to her. It reminds me of an issue I raised with Blanton: Why make waves? “Ninety percent of the time I love my
wife,” I told him. “And ten percent of the time I hate her. Why should I hurt her feelings that ten percent of the time? Why not just wait until that phase passes and I return to the true feeling, which is that I love her?”

Blanton’s response: “Because you’re a manipulative, lying son of a bitch.”

Maybe he’s right. It’s manipulative and patronizing to shut up and listen. But it’s exhausting not to.

One other thing is also becoming apparent: There’s a fine line between Radical Honesty and creepiness. Or actually no line at all. It’s simple logic: Men think about sex every three minutes, as the scientists at
Redbook
remind us. If you speak whatever’s on your mind, you’ll be talking about sex every three minutes.

I have a business breakfast with an editor from Rachael Ray’s magazine. As we’re sitting together, I tell her that I remember what she wore the first time we met—a black shirt that revealed her shoulders in a provocative way. I say that I’d try to sleep with her if I were single. I confess to her that I just attempted (unsuccessfully) to look down her shirt during breakfast.

She smiles. Though I do notice she leans back farther in her seat.

The thing is, the separate cubbyholes of my personality are merging. Usually, there’s a professional self, a home self, a friend self, a with-the-guys self. Now it’s one big improper mess. Either this woman and I have taken a step forward in our relationship, or she’ll never return my calls again.

When I get home, I keep the momentum going. I call a friend to say that I fantasize about his wife. (He says he likes my wife, too, and suggests a key party.)

I inform our nanny, Michelle, that “if my wife left me, I would ask you out on a date, because I think you are stunning.”

She laughs. Nervously.

“I think that makes you uncomfortable, so I won’t mention it again. It was just on my mind.”

Now I’ve made my own skin crawl. I feel like I should just buy a trench coat and start lurking around subway platforms. Blanton says he doesn’t believe sex talk in the workplace counts as sexual harassment—it’s tight-assed society’s fault if people can’t handle the truth—but my nanny confession just feels like pure abuse of power.

All this lasciviousness might be more palatable if I were a single man. In fact, I have a theory: I think Blanton devised Radical Honesty partly as a way to pick up women. It’s a brilliant strategy. The antithesis of mind games. Transparent mating.

And according to Blanton, it’s effective. He tells me about a woman he once met on a Paris subway and asked out for tea. When they sat down, he said, “I didn’t really want any tea; I was just trying to figure out a way to delay you so I could talk to you for a while, because I want to go to bed with you.” They went to bed together. Or another seduction technique of his: “Wanna fuck?”

“That works?” I asked.

“Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, but it’s the creation of possibility.”

I lied today. A retired man from New Hampshire—a friend of a friend—wrote some poems and sent them to me. His wife just died, and he’s taken up poetry. He just wanted someone in publishing to read his work. A professional opinion.

I read them. I didn’t like them much, but I wrote to him that I thought they were very good.

So I e-mail Blanton for the first time since our meeting and confess what I did. I write, “
His wife just died, he doesn’t have friends. He’s kind of pathetic. I read his stuff, or skimmed it actually. I didn’t like it. I thought it was boring and badly written. So I e-mailed a lie. I said I really like the poems and hope they get published. He wrote me back so excited and how it made his week and how he was about to give up on them but my e-mail gave him the stamina to keep trying
.”

I ask Blanton whether I made a mistake.

He responds curtly. I need to come to his eight-day workshop to “
even begin to get what [Radical Honesty] is about
.” He says we need to meet in person.

Meet in person? Did he toss down so many bourbons I vanished from his memory? I tell him we did meet.

Blanton writes back testily that he remembers. But I still need to take a workshop (price tag: $2,800). His only advice on my quandary: “
Send the man the e-mail you sent me about lying to him and ask him to call you when he gets it . . . and see what you learn
.”

Show him the e-mail? Are you kidding? What a hard-core bastard.

In his book,
Radical Honesty,
Blanton advises us to start sentences with the words “I resent you for” or “I appreciate you for.” So I write him back.

I resent you for being so different in these e-mails than you were when we met. You were friendly and engaging and encouraging when we met. Now you seem to have turned judgmental and tough. I resent you for giving me the advice to break that old man’s heart by telling him that his poems suck
.

Blanton responds quickly. First, he doesn’t like that I expressed my resentment by e-mail. I should have come to see him. “
What you don’t seem to get yet, A.J., is that the reason for expressing resentment directly and in person is so that you can experience in your body the sensations that occur when you express the resentment, while at the same time being in the presence of the person you resent, and so you can stay with them until the sensations arise and recede and then get back to neutral—which is what forgiveness is
.”

Second, he tells me that telling the old man the truth would be compassionate, showing the “
authentic caring underneath your usual intellectual bullshit and overvaluing of your critical judgment. Your lie is not useful to him. In fact, it is simply avoiding your responsibility as one human being to another. That’s okay. It happens all the time. It is not a mortal sin. But don’t bullshit yourself about it being kind
.”

He ends with this: “
I don’t want to spend a lot of time explaining things to you for your cute little project of playing with telling the truth if you don’t have the balls to try it
.”

Condescending prick.

I know my e-mail to the old man was wrong. I shouldn’t have been so rah-rah effusive. But here I’ve hit the outer limit of Radical Honesty, a hard wall. I can’t trash the old man.