At the Hands of a Stranger (23 page)

Bridges: Right.

Hilton: That's what I told you because they had me under kidnapping, and it was going to stick. The evidence was good right out of the Dumpster. It was just a smoking gun. They had me, and on the kidnapping charge it's the same as a life sentence for me. It's either forty years first-degree or life with bodily harm, so I was getting a life sentence, and they had that, and so there was no real use in keeping the girl's body—except not to be charged with murder and everything—and I did it under those things because they had me, and I did it for the girl's family.

Bridges: Right.

Hilton: The point I'm trying to make is I gave the girl's body up because you had me. You had me, fair and square, and I was getting life.

Bridges: But you were talking about …

Hilton: Tabor. At that time, the girl was alive, and if Tabor hadn't have been such a little smart-ass … He's such a girl … tattletale's here …. These guys are such … I called Tabor and I told him I needed money, and I wanted to start working for him again, and I was really sincere in trying to start work again for him, because I saw that this robbery shit wasn't getting it, because I hadn't—hadn't gotten any money off her. You know, I hadn't got a dime. I had spent money on her. I had forty-five dollars to my name, and I had done spent thirty dollars of it driving all over Georgia trying to work her ATM card on the bogus numbers she gave me. I lost money on that deal, you know, and so Tabor had to be coy, and, you know, carry it all the way.
I asked for eight hundred. “Well, I don't know if I can give you that.” I said, “Well, you know …” “Okay, I'll leave you a check.”
Yeah, he's such a damn girl. Just a smart-ass yuppie. If Tabor—trust me, tell Tabor this—if he hadn't been trying to entrap me … He wanted me, you know, to come and get it at the office. He was just setting a trap for me. He's the one that called to begin with, you know. He was the first one that turned me in. If Tabor had said, “Hey, Gary, they know it's you. They're looking for you now.” I wasn't in the paper that day. I had joked about it with the girl. This is the second or third day I had her. She still wasn't in the paper. I said, “You know something, no one's even missed you,” and she said, “Well, I'd be mad if once you let me go, and I came back, and my boyfriend said, ‘Have you been gone?' We were laughing about it because nothing appeared in the paper. I said, “They hadn't even reported you missing yet.” It was like the second or third day, or third day after she went missing, something like that. The day before she was killed, okay? Tabor had already turned me in, but it hadn't hit the papers yet. It hit the papers on Friday. I got that, and it was on the front page. Well, I saw that article like two hours after I killed her. If I had bought a paper that morning on Friday, instead of that afternoon, she would have been alive because my picture's on the front page. A color picture on the front page of the
AJC,
looking for me and everything. I wouldn't have killed her. For Pete's sake, no. And the same holds true with Tabor.
Instead of trying to be a smart-ass and lay a trap for me, if Tabor had just said, “Hey, Gary, that hiker,” but she wasn't in the paper. I bought a paper the day … I had just bought the paper in the gas station before I went there and looked at the paper. They didn't have a pay phone at the gas station I bought the paper at, so I went across to the Huddle House to use the phone. I had already looked in the paper. I showed her the paper. I said, “They haven't even reported you missing yet. You've not even been in the paper.” But if Tabor had just said, “Gary, they know it's you …. They're looking for you,” the girl would be alive. Listen, the reason for killing the girl—it was either once you've taken someone, you're either going to kill them, or you're going to get caught. It's as simple as that. In my situation, look at me. I got the dog. I got the van. I'm me. I'm famous, anyway. Regardless, and I know it, and once you've taken someone, you either kill them, or you get caught. If you release them, you're going to get caught.
Well, she seen the van. She seen the tag. She seen the dog. All she has to do is put that out, and ten thousand people will be calling, including Tabor. He was just the first one, you know. Of course I knew it. You either kill them, or you get caught. Okay? But if you're already caught, there's no use in killing them. I didn't kill them because … for any satisfaction. It was distasteful. It was dreadful. Trust me, it was. Of course, I was able to do it because of my general rage against society, of course. It's because I'd become … Well, you get that way in Atlanta.

Howard: Smog and traffic.

Hilton: And the people think they're just fucking royalty, even though they're idiots.

Howard: I guess Tabor's kind of part of that somewhere.

Hilton: Tabor's a kind of part of that. But Tabor is a little more. When it comes to individual human beings, the answer is rarely simple. I simplify groups of human beings. You really have to, actually, to preserve your scalp, for that matter. You have to make broad judgments about groups of human beings, but always understanding that [with] individual human beings the answer is rarely simple.

Bridges: You and Tabor were pretty tight, right?

Hilton: No, I was tight with Tabor. Tabor was not tight with me, nor is he tight with anyone. I talked to him a lot, and if Tabor was screwing me, he'd screw his mother. He'd screw his wife. He'd screw anybody. He's a psychopath. I'm sure Tabor's laughing now because I called Tabor a psychopathic criminal with no heart, no conscience, and no moral compass, and I'm sure he's saying, “Yeah, look who's talking.” Tabor is worse than me. He's just not dangerous like me. He's—he's just your … a girl. Yeah, he's a girl. I'm a stud. Okay? So I did a crime that studs would do. Yeah. He does a crime that girls would do, which is lying and stealing.

Howard: Did he confess this—this bisexuality to you, or—

Hilton: Oh, I've been around enough, man. That older woman I told you back when I left my wife. In 1971, she was what they call a “fag hag.” A fag hag is a woman who runs with homosexuals, you know. And it worked out good for them, because they … Everywhere they go, there's her running buddies. Gorgeous, good-looking guys who don't look like queers, and you know … at the same time, she relates to them as a woman, not as a man, so they can be girls with her.
Their girl side—you know what I mean? Fags have the heart and the soul of a woman, with the sex drive of a man, basically—which is why they are so inordinately, flagrantly promiscuous ….

Although Gary Hilton continued to talk for another hour, getting on the podium to give evaluations of police procedures, the sociology of homosexuality and bisexuality, and mind over matter, he said nothing that was relevant to the investigation.

The two GBI special agents were exhausted from listening to his disheveled thoughts and guiding him toward more useful things rather than wade through his personal gibberish. They had learned about Hilton's travels, where he was during various time periods, the cars that he drove, and his philosophy about killing kidnapped people.

He had inadvertently strengthened suspicions that slaughtering people was not new to him:
“You either kill them, or you get caught.”

Chapter 14

There was a feeling of angst in the Dawson County Superior Court at 1:30
P.M
. on Thursday, January 31, 2008, that seemed to deplete the oxygen for those who had gathered for the sentencing phase of Hilton's murder trial. The grief had clearly wounded Meredith Emerson's parents and friends to a degree that was impossible to describe. They were suffering as they realized that no punishment would ever bring their daughter back.

Susan and David Emerson already knew what the sentence would be and had accepted it so they could give their daughter's remains a proper memorial and resting place and get on with life as best they could. Both knew there would always be an empty place in their heart, which would never be filled.

Lee Darragh, Dawson County district attorney, represented the state. Darragh, a middle-aged man, with silver hair and an elegance of movement, looked as if he had been assigned his role by central casting for a movie production company. H. Bradford Morris Jr. and Robert R. McNeill, who were seasoned trial lawyers from the public defender's office, represented Gary Hilton.

The gallery was packed with people—most attendees were there to offer support to Meredith Emerson's family and friends. Newspaper and television news reporting on the race to find Emerson alive had captured the hearts of residents in the area and they had come to love the young woman. She was one of their own: she had lived and worked in Georgia and had graduated from the University of Florida.

Georgia trials are divided into two parts: a penalty phase, where the jury hears evidence, deliberates, and renders a verdict; it is then followed by a sentencing phase, where interested parties can address the court to offer mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Mitigating circumstances are meant to show the defendant in a favorable light and sway the sentence recommended by a jury or imposed by a judge. Aggravating circumstances are those that show the crime in its raw, unadulterated cruelty, in the hope of winning a harsher sentence.

There was no one present to offer mitigating circumstances for Gary Hilton.

Superior court judge Bonnie C. Oliver called the court to order and told Darragh to proceed.

 

DA Lee Darragh told the judge that the grand jury of Dawson County had returned a true bill of indictment earlier that morning against Hilton for murder. He said that the people of Georgia, Dawson County, embodied by the grand jury, “charge and accuse Gary Michael Hilton with the offense of murder” and that “on the fourth day of January 2008, did unlawfully and with malice aforethought cause the death of Meredith Hope Emerson … through the commission of a forcible felony … aggravated battery, by causing blunt-force trauma to her head.”

The district attorney told the judge that Hilton had entered a plea of guilty earlier in the day and that it was witnessed by McNeill, one of Hilton's public defenders. Darragh had also signed the indictment, as did Hilton and Morris, Hilton's other attorney. After going through the legal formalities, Darragh said he would present the indictment to the court.

“Your Honor, the defendant has agreed to enter a plea of guilty in return for a recommendation from the state that he be sentenced to life imprisonment, and has completed a plea petition stating so,” Darragh continued. He asked the judge to allow him to present facts that supported the plea of guilty.

Judge Oliver consented.

The district attorney told the judge that Hilton regularly visited national and state parks and that he was seen the day “before the kidnapping and eventual murder” of Emerson. Hilton was seen on the Appalachian Trail, Darragh said, where Emerson had eventually been kidnapped. Hilton had intended to kidnap a woman he followed and had actually talked with, but the plan didn't materialize because she was with several other people.

“And on the next day, Tuesday, January 1, 2008, at about one
P.M
., Ms. Emerson arrived at the Byron Herbert Reece Memorial Trailhead parking area in Union County,” he said. “There were witnesses who saw him at that location. There were also witnesses who observed Mr. Hilton following Ms. Emerson on the Appalachian Trail at different intervals. One gentleman was a former law enforcement officer and noted that the defendant was carrying a large knife and a police-style baton on his belt.

“Later that afternoon that witness found two water bottles, a dog leash, and some dog treats, along with a police-style baton, lying on the edge of the Reece Trail,” Darragh continued. “He believed that the baton was dropped by this defendant and became concerned for Ms. Emerson's well-being, and suspected a struggle at that location.”

Darragh said that later investigation showed there was a struggle between Hilton and Emerson. “The defendant … was able to place her under his control eventually and took her down the trail back to where her car was and where his van was,” Darragh said. He added that Hilton took some ATM cards, identification cards, and other items that were in Emerson's car and placed them in his vehicle.

“Throughout the next couple of days, Mr. Hilton basically rode Ms. Emerson around to various locations throughout North Georgia, seeking to get money from her ATMs,” the district attorney continued. “During this time Ms. Emerson often gave him incorrect PIN numbers and he was unsuccessful. Although it is unclear, I would like to think it is because she was doing everything she could to insure that perhaps he would get caught during his efforts to use the ATMs.”

Darragh talked about how witnesses saw Hilton on January 4 along the Dawson Forest Wildlife Management Area. Eventually, he said, Hilton was caught in DeKalb County, where he was trying to dispose of evidence, but he wasn't successful at that attempt.

“Evidence from his van included items containing blood and other items that were connected with Ms. Emerson,” Darragh said. “Those items, through examination, DNA comparison, proved to contain some blood of Ms. Emerson. That was on Friday, January the fourth, when he was finally arrested that evening.”

At the time, Darragh said, Hilton was arrested on an outstanding warrant for failure to appear that had been issued by the U.S. Northern District of Georgia, and was taken into custody by U.S. Marshals. The next day Hilton was charged with kidnapping with bodily injury, and on Monday, January 7, 2008, Hilton was denied bond in Union County. Plea bargains were started almost immediately by the Union County district attorney and the public defender who represented Hilton at the time. Under the plea bargain Gary Hilton agreed to show the police where Emerson's remains were located—if the state would not ask for the death penalty. He told the court about Emerson's decapitation after death “for forensic purposes” and the defendant's attempt to destroy evidence, all to make it harder to identify the body. Darragh explained all of this to show that the state had followed all required procedures in striking the plea bargain and that Hilton understood the consequences. Hilton and his public defenders acknowledged that the defendant was fully cognizant of the ramifications of his plea bargain.

 

Following DA Darragh's remarks, Judge Oliver had a few questions for the defense.

“Were all the facts and possible defenses discussed with Mr. Hilton?” she asked.

“At great length, Your Honor,” Robert McNeill answered.

“Is there any meritorious defense for Mr. Hilton?”

Both McNeill and Morris said they weren't aware of any. The public defenders also answered in the affirmative when the judge asked whether or not Hilton was competent. Having been satisfied that no stone had been left unturned that could result in a mistrial or an appeal, Judge Oliver told Hilton she had a series of questions for him.

Hilton asked, “Should I stand?”

The judge told him she had already informed the defense that he could remain seated. She asked for Hilton's full name, age, if he could read and write, and whether he was under the influence of any kind of drug, alcohol, or intoxicant. His answers consisted largely of three-word sentences: “No, Your Honor” or “Yes, Your Honor.”

“Do you now suffer from any mental or emotional disability?”

“No, Your Honor.”

Hilton answered in the affirmative when he was asked if he fully understood the plea bargain, confession, the nature of the charges against him, and his right to plead not guilty. He acknowledged that he had a right to a trial and that no threats, force, pressure, or any other type of intimidation had been made to persuade him to enter a guilty plea. Hilton answered yes, when he was asked if he understood he would receive a sentence of life in prison; and he said he was satisfied with his lawyers and how his case was presented.

“Did you, in fact, commit the unlawful acts set forth in the indictment against you to which you are proposing to enter a plea?”

“Yes, Your Honor.”

“Do you now want to enter a plea of guilty?”

Hilton said he did.

“And how do you plead to the charge of the murder in Dawson County, Georgia, on the fourth day of January 2008 with malice aforethought causing the death of Meredith Hope Emerson?”

“Guilty, Your Honor.”

Finished with her questions to Hilton, Judge Oliver directed her attention to Darragh and asked him if he knew the average length of time that it takes in Georgia to get a death penalty case to trial. Darragh said that it usually takes two to three years after an arrest to bring a case to trial, and the average amount of time spent on death row until execution is about twelve years.

The judge asked if Emerson's family was opposed to the plea bargain. They supported the arrangement, Lee Darragh told Judge Oliver.

“Their beloved daughter went first missing only thirty days ago,” he said, “and here we are before the court closing this matter.

“This is a situation that will not be over for them by any stretch of the imagination,” he continued, “but through the acceptance of this plea, they can get this legal aspect of what has occurred behind them …. Before I made the actual offer … I discussed it with the Emersons very thoroughly.”

Darragh said a life sentence without parole meant that Hilton would spend the rest of his life in prison.

Judge Oliver removed her glasses for a moment and looked at Hilton through narrowed eyes and then she spoke.

“Because we are a civilized society and our system of laws has many protections and safeguards built in to prevent injustice in even the most heinous of crimes, I will consider this plea.” She told Hilton that the community and most of the state would consider his immediate execution as the only satisfactory penalty.

“Even the most tenderhearted among us would consider your actions deserving of the severest punishment,” she said. Because it was so important for the victim's family and friends to recover her remains, Judge Oliver said she would accept the plea bargain.

Because he was sixty-one years old, with a life expectancy of seventeen more years, the judge told Hilton, it would be unlikely that he would live long enough to be executed if the death penalty was ordered.

Hilton told her there was nothing he wanted to say before the judge passed sentence. Hilton's sentence was to spend the rest of his life in a Georgia prison without the possibility of parole.

 

Following the sentence, Meredith's parents were allowed to address the court. They said in part:

“We stand before you as brokenhearted parents, having lost our beloved daughter to the vicious murder committed by Mr. Hilton,” David Emerson said. “Our days are filled with tears, blank stares, and we constantly struggle through each day. Meredith was our shining light in our lives and now we are left with a hole in our hearts that will not heal.”

Their daughter had been an inspiration for good and had treated everyone with respect and dignity. “The out-pouring of love and support from friends and loved ones and countless numbers of strangers is a testimony to how Meredith touched so many people in a positive way, both in life and death,” David Emerson said.

As a father who had lost his daughter so early in her life, Emerson said he would feel the grief and pain forever. Gone was his joyful anticipation of walking his daughter down the aisle at her wedding or holding one of the children whom she now would never have.

“I feel that no punishment for Mr. Hilton is too great,” he said. David noted that we provide food and shelter and protection for criminals such as Hilton instead of allowing the family to administer what it considered justice.

“I only pray that he suffers immensely for his heinous acts and that even his fellow inmates recognize his evil and malevolence … and treat him with appropriate measures.”

Barely able to hold back tears, David listened to his wife, Susan, speak to Hilton. Before addressing him, she told the judge that Meredith's brother, Mark, had found it too difficult to pen his own statement. She was also speaking for him, she said.

Susan Emerson told the judge that there was “no such thing as justice” in this case. Nothing would bring their daughter back. She did not regret that the death penalty had been taken out of consideration, Susan said. That would have been an easy way out for him; instead, she hoped that “he should stay alive and slowly rot.”

She mocked Hilton's pretense of being a soldier on perpetual maneuvers:

“He is nothing more than a bully and a weak-minded man on the run,” she observed. “He fancies himself a survivalist, while anyone can see he is a scared little man on the run. He is the fool who goes through life too ignorant to realize he is a fool, and Meredith has exposed him.”

The grieving and angry mother said that her daughter was one of the few people who would forgive him, if given the chance.

“I have no doubt that her goodness and light intimidated the hell out of him, so he struck out in fear,” Emerson said. “I'm sure he thinks he snuffed out her light, but the truth is, she is stronger and brighter than ever, while he has been diminished.”

Other books

Alpha One: The Kronan by Chris Burton
A Puzzle in a Pear Tree by Parnell Hall
Mirrors by Ted Dekker
La sombra del águila by Arturo Pérez-Reverte
Winds of Fortune by Radclyffe
Love With a Scandalous Lord by Lorraine Heath
Soul Catcher by Katia Lief
Hero in the Highlands by Suzanne Enoch
Set Free by Anthony Bidulka
Blueprints: A Novel by Barbara Delinsky