Carnal Isræl: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture (171 page)

Read Carnal Isræl: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture Online

Authors: Daniel Boyarin

Tags: #Religion, #Judaism, #General

< previous page
page_69
next page >
Page 69
science of the mind which inclines as it will. . . . And the spirit of truth testifies to all things and brings all accusations" (Kee 1983, 800). In some of these passages, moreover, the "evil spirit" is explicitly defined as sexuality and opposed by a "good spirit" that is anti-sexual: "And the spirits of error have no power over him [the genuine man], since he does not include feminine beauty in the scope of his vision" (Kee 1983, 803). "For the person with a mind that is pure with love does not look on a woman for the purpose of having sexual relations'' (Kee 1983, 827).
Other passages in this same text, however, seem to prefigure the later rabbinic dialectical understanding of sexuality. The following extract comes closer to the later doctrine, though it still maintains the separation between the good and evil sides and does not yet understand them as inextricably identified:
And now give heed to me, my children, concerning the things which I saw during my time of penitence, concerning the seven spirits of deceit. For seven spirits are established against mankind, and they are the sources of the deeds of youth. And seven other spirits are given to man at creation so that by them every human deed (is done). First is the spirit of life, with which man is created as a composite being. The second is the spirit of seeing, with which comes desire. The third is the spirit of hearing, with which comes instruction. The fourth is the spirit of smell, with which is given taste for drawing air and breath. The fifth is the spirit of speech, with which comes knowledge. The sixth is the spirit of taste for consuming food and drink; by it comes strength, because in food is the substance of strength. The seventh is the spirit of procreation and intercourse, with which come sins through fondness for pleasure. For this reason, it was the last in the creation and the first in youth, because it is filled with ignorance; it leads the young person like a blind man into a ditch and like an animal over a cliff.
In addition to all is an eighth spirit: sleep, with which is created the ecstasy of nature and the image of death.
With these are commingled the spirits of error
. First the spirit of promiscuity resides in the nature and the senses. A second spirit of insatiability, in the stomach.
(Kee 1983, 78283)
Although, to be sure, this text maintains a structure of opposing sets of spirits, nevertheless, it emphasizes that the two sets are commingled and indeed recognizes sexual desire as problematic but nonetheless belonging per se in the first set, among the "seven other spirits [which] are given to man at creation so that by them every human deed [is done]." The power of sexual desire, however, is such that it can lead the unsuspecting young
 
< previous page
page_69
next page >
< previous page
page_7
next page >
Page 7
Jews against Christians, that they were deficient because they did not marry and have children, was not unknown. The Mesopotamian Father, Aphrahat, represents this topos precisely and accurately, citing a Jewish voice, as well as his disdain for that voice:
I have written to you, my beloved, concerning virginity and holiness because I heard about a Jewish man who has reviled one of our brethren, the members of the church. He said to him, "You are impure for you don't take wives. But we are holy and more virtuous for we bear children and multiply seed in the world."
(Wright 1869, 355)
13
Some of these differences persist until this day. Witness the difference between the meanings of the declarations, "I am not a Christian," and "I am not a Jew." The former says something about beliefs and commitments, while the latter says something about genealogy. This book will explore the historical roots of this difference in the formative period of rabbinic Judaism (the ancestor of virtually all later Judaism) and Christianity.
The contestation around the body between rabbinic Judaism and its Hellenistic (that is, Greek-speaking) competitors (whether forebears or contemporaries), including Paul, manifested itself in several seemingly disparate areas of socio-cultural practice, indeed in arenas as seemingly unconnected as gender and marriage practices, methods of interpretation of scripture, and ideologies of ethnicity and history. The organization of this book itself reflects to a certain degree these different areas of culture and attempts to show how they work together in the discourse of rabbinic Judaism. To be sure, the lion's share of the book (all but the last chapter) deals directly with the discourse of sexuality per se, but the argument of the book is completed in the last chapter, where an attempt is made to show how precisely the same set of differences between rabbinic Judaism and its Greek-speaking contenders works itself out with respect to the question of the literal or figurative interpretations of Jewish ethnicity. For the Jews of late antiquity, I claim, the rite of circumcision became the most contested site of this contention, precisely because of the way that it concentrates in one moment representations of the significance of sexuality, genealogy, and ethnic specificity in bodily practice. The contest between the two broadly defined types of Jewish religiosity here shifts
13. For further discussion of this fascinating passage, see below Chapter 5, n. 10.
 
< previous page
page_7
next page >

Other books

Silvertip's Roundup by Brand, Max
Phobia KDP by Shives, C.A.
The Philip K. Dick Megapack by Dick, Philip K.
I and Sproggy by Constance C. Greene
Breaking Even by C.M. Owens
Daddy's Little Angel by Shani Petroff
Suspicion At Sea by Nichols, Amie