Authors: John Yoo
Tags: #History: American, #USA, #U.S. President, #Constitution: government & the state, #Constitutions, #Government, #Executive Branch, #Executive power - United States - History, #Constitutional & administrative law, #Law, #Constitutional history, #United States History (Specific Aspects), #Constitutional, #United States, #Presidents & Heads of State, #POLITICAL SCIENCE, #Legal status, #Executive power, #History, #Constitutional history - United States, #History of the Americas, #United States - General, #Presidents, #National Law: Professional, #Political History, #General, #History - U.S., #Presidents - Legal status, #etc - United States - History, #Biography & Autobiography, #Government - Executive Branch, #etc., #laws
The Union, however, was nonnegotiable. Six days later, Jackson issued an extraordinary proclamation that drew on his constitutional powers "for preserving the peace of the Union and for the execution of the laws."
198
The American people, he said, spoke as one in electing the President; on behalf of the nation, Jackson left no doubts about his position on nullification. Nullification was
"incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which it was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed
."
199
He made short work of South Carolina's criticism of the tariff laws and denied that a state could pick and choose which federal laws to enforce. Even if the Supremacy Clause had not expressly provided for the superiority of federal law, it was inherent in the creation of the federal system. "Our Constitution does not contain the absurdity of giving power to make laws and another to resist them."
200
If a single state could block federal law, the Constitution was useless. "Vain provisions! ineffectual restrictions! vile profanation of oaths! miserable mockery of legislation!"
201
For Jackson, the question boiled down to what came first, the states or the nation. Only if the Constitution was merely a league, and the nation just an agreement of the states, could a state choose to withdraw or change the terms of the contract. But if the United States were a nation, representing the people directly, no state could set itself apart. Even before the Declaration of Independence, Jackson observed, "we were known in our aggregate character as
the United Colonies of America
," and "[w]e declared ourselves a nation by a joint, not by several acts..."
202
The states have transferred parts of their sovereignty over issues such as war and peace to the federal government, and the allegiance of their citizens to the nation. No state could place itself above that act of union. Nullification was merely a "[m]etaphysical subtlety, in pursuit of an impracticable theory," designed to destroy the Union by forcing it to depend on the goodwill of individual states.
203
It was no defense to claim that the tariff affected one region more than another. Every law impacts states and regions differently. On a point dear to him, Jackson suggested that the War of 1812 would have had a different outcome had states nullified laws that impacted them unequally -- a veiled reference to the talk of secession that had swept New England.
204
It did not matter that Congress wanted to spend the money on unconstitutional projects, such as internal improvements, which Jackson himself had vetoed. What mattered was whether Congress's
act
in passing the tariff was constitutional, not whether its
motive
was.
It could not have been lost on observers that Jackson was arguing that states could not nullify a federal law, even though he had claimed almost the same power during the Bank fight. Nullification, however, did not undermine his claim of presidential power because the former represented the effort of a regional minority to block the authority of a national majority, while the latter (in his mind) represented the will of the people as a whole. Nullification struck at the very heart of Jackson's program, the expansion of majoritarian democracy. "The Constitution of the United States," he wrote in the proclamation, "forms a
government
, not a league ... "
205
In that government, "all the people are represented," and it "operates directly on the people individually, not upon the States..."
206
Because of this direct link between the people and the Union, the national government and its leaders could not arbitrarily choose to ignore the Constitution and give up powers to the states, nor could it allow a state to fence itself off from federal law. "[S]uch secession does not break a league, but destroys the unity of a nation; and any injury to that unity is not only a breach which would result from the contravention of a compact, but it is an offense against the whole Union."
207
Secession, which Jackson believed was the real motivation behind nullification, directly contradicted American nationhood. "To say that any State may at pleasure secede from the Union is to say that the United States are not a nation," Jackson wrote.
208
Robert Remini observes that Jackson was the first major American statesman to argue that the Union was a perpetual entity.
209
Although there were antecedents, such as the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, and Washington's Farewell Address, Jackson's proclamation represents one of the most compelling statements of the theory of American nationhood. Lincoln would owe much to Jackson's theory of the Constitution, the Presidency, and the Union.
Jackson's conclusion followed his strategy of seeking political accommodation while preparing for legal and even military confrontation. He appealed to South Carolina's citizens to put aside thoughts of disunion. Jackson addressed them as "[f]ellow-citizens of my native State." Their leaders had deluded them, and he warned them as "a father would over his children whom he saw rushing to certain ruin."
210
He appealed to their patriotism: "Carolina is one of these proud States; her arms have defended, her best blood has cemented, this happy Union."
211
But Jackson left no doubts about what would happen if South Carolina did not compromise. "Disunion by armed force is
treason."
212
No one needed a refresher on what Jackson had done to the enemies of the United States. "The laws of the United States must be executed," Jackson declared.
213
" "I have no discretionary power on the subject; my duty is emphatically pronounced in the Constitution."
214
The President left little doubt that he would resort to military force if need be. "On your unhappy State will inevitably fall all the evils of the conflict you force upon the Government of your country."
215
Jackson promised that their defeat would be certain.
[The Constitution's] destroyers you can not be. You may disturb its peace, you may interrupt the course of its prosperity, you may cloud its reputation for stability; but its tranquility will be restored, its prosperity will return, and the stain upon its national character will be transferred and remain an eternal blot on the memory of those who caused the disorder.
216
South Carolina remained unmoved by the proclamation, which was greeted with widespread support throughout much of the country. Three days later, South Carolina's governor resigned to lead the state's militia; Senator Hayne became governor, and Calhoun became Senator. Twenty-five thousand South Carolinians volunteered to fight. The legislature authorized the governor to call out the militia and to begin a draft and appropriated $250,000 for arms.
217
Jackson sent military troops and a naval vessel to reinforce the federal bases in Charleston Harbor. He ordered the War Department to prepare three divisions of artillery to move against the state the moment it resorted to force.
218
In a letter to a Union supporter in the state, Jackson promised that if South Carolina attacked, he would "call into the field, such a force as will overaw[e] resistance, put treason and rebellion down without blood," and arrest those guilty of treason and rebellion.
219
Jackson planned for 10,000-15,000 federal troops to occupy Charleston within two weeks of an outbreak of violence, and drafted an order calling the militia to defend the Union.
220
Jackson turned to Congress for a peaceful solution. Congressional action would slow the rush to confrontation and serve as a forum to further isolate South Carolina. Jackson recognized that if he acted unilaterally, he "would be branded with the epithet,
tyrant
."
221
He extended an olive branch by proposing to return tariffs to their 1818 levels.
At the same time, Jackson responded to South Carolina's military preparations by requesting a "Force Bill." Jackson informed Congress that he would continue the collection of federal customs in the port of Charleston and would move the location of the Customs House to a more defensible fort. South Carolina would have to fire the first shot, as it would in 1861. He wanted Congress to delegate broad authority to relocate these federal offices, make some technical changes to expand the jurisdiction of the federal courts in the area, and amend the Militia Acts to allow him to immediately call federal forces into action when federal law was obstructed. He labeled South Carolina's actions as "revolutionary in their character and tendency, and subversive of the supremacy of the laws and of the integrity of the Union," a "usurpation of power," and a threat to the "liberties and happiness of the millions composing this Union."
222
He closed by making clear, once again, that the Union represented the people, that he acted on behalf of that people, and that a small minority could not secede from it. The Framers "bequeathed to us a Government of laws and a Federal Union founded upon the great principle of popular representation."
223
Jackson was called upon to discharge the duty of protecting the Union. Congress must act to "solemnly proclaim that the Constitution and the laws are supreme and the
Union indissoluble."
224
While the Force Bill conveyed no new authority, it called for political support from Congress should military action become necessary. Congress remained the only national forum where different regional interests could negotiate a bargain, and it held the constitutional authority over tariff rates. Jackson's willingness to make a deal on the tariff, combined with his display of indomitable will on the constitutional issue, produced a political resolution. South Carolina postponed nullification while the Senate debated the force and tariff bills.
With the rare spectacle of Clay supporting the administration, the Senate passed the Force Bill after the few supporters of nullification left the Senate chamber in protest.
225
Clay reached a bargain with Calhoun, in which the former supported a reduction in tariffs in exchange for South Carolina's repeal of its nullification law. Jackson's "promise" of war had convinced South Carolina's representatives to give way.
226
The Clay-Calhoun tariff passed quickly at the same time as the Force Bill, which received an overwhelming 100-vote majority in the House -- a demonstration of Jackson's success in politically isolating South Carolina, not just in the North and West, but also in the South.
Historians consider Jackson's victory in the nullification fight his greatest achievement as President. He stopped a movement to undermine the supremacy of federal law that could have brought secession three decades early. Although he threatened military force, he kept pushing for a political solution that would avoid conflict and preserve the Union. Jackson could not have reached this result without a broad vision of his duty to enforce the law, his power as Chief Executive and Commander-in-Chief, and his role as representative of American democracy. He used this robust understanding of the Presidency to pursue his understanding of the United States as a Union of one people. A President with a smaller conception of the office, like some of his successors, might have disclaimed any role in settling the issue of secession -- after all, there is no enumerated power in the Constitution giving the President the authority to settle political disputes between the regions -- and allowed South Carolina to go its own way. Jackson's genius was to harness the theory of one Union and one American people to the rising forces of democracy, but he could not have succeeded without a broad understanding of his constitutional powers and the willingness to use them.
CONCLUSIONS
JACKSON RECONSTRUCTED the Presidency. His tenure in the office was every bit as revolutionary as that of Washington or Jefferson. He did not restore the office by breaking its constitutional limits, as critics claimed, but by fulfilling the broadest visions of its Framers. They wanted the office to rest on the choice of a national electorate, bringing accountability and responsibility, but with enough distance to avoid the whims of temporary public passion. They wanted the President to be independent of Congress and exercise his own constitutional powers.
Jackson broke Congress's control over the office and established the Presidency as a coequal, competing voice of the people's wishes. The people, not Congress, would select the President. It would be the people, not Congress, whom Jackson represented. Critical to reasserting the Presidency's independence was Jackson's declaration of the right to interpret the Constitution for himself, rather than defer to the Supreme Court or Congress. In making the Presidency the
primus inter pares
of the national government, Jackson drew upon the other powers of his office, including control over the execution of the law, removal of subordinates, and of course, the veto pen.
Jackson's exercise of the Presidency's powers produced results that many would not agree with today. Jackson almost single-handedly conquered Florida for the United States, and set the stage for Texas's annexation, without legislative approval and support. While removing the Bank from politics, Jackson's war against Biddle destroyed the benefits of an independent central bank. A national bank, properly managed, could have helped smooth the boom-and-bust cycles of the American economy in the decades to come. Removal of the Indians allowed for broader settlement of the Southwest, but it visited untold suffering on the Cherokee and other tribes. Jackson's strong faith in American expansionism did not include a place for Indians, and the results of his policies remain one of the terrible examples of the nation's mistreatment of its own people.