Serpent on the Rock (67 page)

Read Serpent on the Rock Online

Authors: Kurt Eichenwald

Tags: #Fiction

138–39:
Mike Fahy's discovery of Della Torre's name was first described in Blumenthal,
Last Days of
the Sicilians
.

141–42:
Ball's comments to the Bache broker meeting in Phoenix from “Ball Takes Bache and Runs with It,”
Fortune
, January 24, 1983. That same article reported his comments about the firm's “second-raters.”

141–45:
Some details of Ball's first days on the job at Bache from Miller,
Institutional Investor
, July 1984. Also, see “New Bache Chief Pushes a Host of Changes, Including New Name, to Lift Firm's Image,” the
Wall Street Journal
, October 29, 1982, and Miller,
Institutional Investor
, July 1984.

144:
The residuals program at Bache is described in a memo from Ball to the firm, dated September 16, 1982.

145:
The new advertising campaign for Prudential-Bache from the advertising column of the
New York
Times
, September 21 and November 1, 1982, and February 10, 1983.

CHAPTER 7

150:
Harrison's spending habits are detailed in copies of receipts, checks, credit card bills, and checking account ledgers that were obtained by the author. Details about Harrison's mismanagement of his Diners Club account come from a May 21, 1981, letter to him from B. Singer, the director of collection for Diners Club International. The information about Harrison exceeding his MasterCard spending limit from a 1982 notice from the MasterCard Department.

151:
Description of Darr's bank accounts, including the Swiss account in which he had an interest through an investment in another entity, from his testimony before the SEC, August 1 and August 2, 1991. Harrison described the gifts he provided Darr, including the artwork worth $8,000 to $9,000, in his testimony in
First
v.
Prudential-Bache
, cited above.

152:
Darr's last-minute changes in fees on a Harrison deal are described in a memo dated June 29, 1981, from Donna Webb of Harrison Freedman to Clifton Harrison.

The Bessemer–Key West deal is described in “Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of Bessemer–Key West Limited Partnership,” dated November 15, 1980.

153:
The author has obtained copies of the May 20, 1981, letter sent by Clifton Harrison to the investors in Bessemer–Key West.

153:
Harrison's net worth or cost basis, as of 1981, is disclosed in “Barbizon New York Ltd. Private Placement Memorandum,” dated October 12, 1981. When an estimated value of his properties was included, his net worth was positive. But that number papered over the riskiness of his financial condition: To get into a positive net worth, he would have to sell his properties. That document also describes the details of the Barbizon deal and the fees involved. Bache Properties' participation in the Barbizon cash flow is described in an August 25, 1982, letter to Clifton Harrison from John D'Elisa.

154:
The author obtained a copy of Harrison's liquor license application from 1982. Harrison's refusal to sign the document is described in the November 3, 1993, deposition in
First
v.
Prudential-Bache
of Andrew Bene, a former executive with Banque Arabe et Internationale D'Investissement, which lent money to the Barbizon deal.

156–57:
The author obtained copies of D'Elisa's memos of April 7, 1982, to Darr and Harrison. The actual impact the document would have in litigation is hard to discern. The firm has not produced the D'Elisa memos in any of the lawsuits involving Harrison that were reviewed by the author.

157–58:
Details of the Archives deal from the “Archives Limited Partnership Private Placement Memorandum,” undated copy.

The financial problems in the Archives deal are described succinctly in Federal District Judge Bruce M. Van Sickle's opinion, dated February 3, 1989, in
McNulty
v.
Prudential-Bache
, civil action number 3-87-196 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division. The opinion was vacated as part of a settlement between McNulty and Prudential-Bache.

164:
The proposed Exchange Center deal was described in “Exchange Center Limited Partnership Investment Summary,” an internal document of Harrison Freedman Associates.

167:
Ball's involvement in the development of the energy income partnership in part from a July 27, 1982, memo from him to Alan Altschuler of Bache.

169–70:
The background of Graham Resources, including its deal with St. Paul, is described in the June 1983 prospectus for the Prudential-Bache Energy Income Fund.

176–77:
The descriptions of the Graham marketing video come from the 1983 script for the promotion.

The number and total investment of Prudential-Bache clients in P-1 from Stuart Goldberg,
Prudential-Bache's $1.3 Billion Energy Income Limited Partnership Oil Scam
, 3rd ed., June 1993. The document is a published analysis of the energy income deals written to assist lawyers in their suits against the firm.

CHAPTER 8

180:
Darr's investment of $4,000 in the first Watson & Taylor public deal is disclosed in his testimony to the Securities and Exchange Commission of August 1, 1991.

180–81:
The conversation between Bill Petty and George Watson is described in Petty's deposition of September 26, 1991, to the Securities and Exchange Commission in its investigation captioned “In the Matter of Certain Limited Partnership Offerings,” case number NY–5975. This deposition is also part of the ongoing investigation and is not publicly available.

Watson has denied that the conversation took place and also denied that the Stemmons deal, called Lombardi Number Three, was presold. And indeed, the documents in the deal show that the two parcels of land involved were acquired on September 29, 1983, and October 7, 1983. Darr's check for $20,600 was deposited on November 11 of that year. The property was sold on February 21, 1984.

Still, the documents raise odd issues. Darr was not admitted as a joint venturer until March 2, 1984, weeks after the property was sold. However, his admission was given an effective date in the documents of September 29, the date of the first land purchase.

Other former Watson & Taylor executives said that, given the hot Texas real estate market, the dates from the documents could easily show a deal that was presold, particularly if there were rezoning efforts needed for the Stemmons property.

The terms of the Lombardi Number Three deal were also publicly described for the first time in the
Business Week
cover story of February 1991, cited above.

182:
The backgrounds of George Watson and A. Starke Taylor III are described in their testimony in United States of America v. Howard J. Wiechern, case number LR-CR-89-64(1) before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Their testimony took place on October 15 and October 16, 1990. Both men were cooperating with the government in the criminal case against Wiechern, the former head of First South Savings, in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

Also, some details from Watson's background are from a 1994
Texas Business School Magazine
, the alumni magazine for the University of Texas at Austin, College and Graduate School and Business.

182–83:
Information about Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor Ltd. 1 is described in the prospectus for that investment, dated January 21, 1983.

183:
Taylor recounted his first meeting with Wiechern during his testimony in
United States of America
v.
Howard J. Wiechern
.

183–84:
The First South loans to Watson & Taylor are described in the civil complaint captioned
Fed
eral Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. George S. Watson, A. Starke Taylor 3d, et al., case number LRC 87–806, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern Division.

Watson & Taylor subsequently filed suit against its law firm, claiming that the violations in the First South investment were the result of bad legal advice. The suit,
Watson & Taylor Realty Company et al.
v.
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld et al.,
was filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, as case number 90–12266-A. It was subsequently settled.

184:
The performance of Watson & Taylor's private land deals was described by Taylor during his testimony in
United States of America
v.
Howard J. Wiechern
.

Details of Darr's investment in Lombardi Number Three and Trinity Mills from “Final Report Regarding Certain Transactions Among James Darr, George Watson and A. Starke Taylor III,” a confidential February 28, 1988, report by Locke Purnell Rain Harrell.

Also, see Darr's deposition of October 18, 1994, in
Griffin
v.
Prudential Securities
, case number 250791 in California State Superior Court in and for the County of San Joaquin. Some details also from Darr's testimony of August 1, 1991, to the SEC.

The author also obtained Darr's Schedule K-1, a federal tax document that lists a limited partner's share of income credits and deductions, from the Lombardi deal for calendar year 1983.

Darr testified that he informed Sherman and Schechter of his investments with Watson & Taylor before they were made on October 18, 1994, in
Griffin
v.
Prudential Securities
. Schechter denies that he was ever told anything meaningful about Darr's investments.

The author obtained certain documents that indicate a degree of Sherman's knowledge. They include a June 14, 1983, memo from Darr to Sherman regarding the Thoner investment and a June 24, 1986, memo from Sherman to Darr relating to some investing material. The second memo says that Darr indicated to Sherman that he had informed Schechter of the investment under discussion.

185:
The First South stock purchases of George Watson and Tracy Taylor are described in “FSLIC's Opposition to the Watson & Taylor Defendant's Motion to Dismiss,” filed March 11, 1988, in
Fed
eral Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. George S. Watson, A. Starke Taylor 3d, et al.

186:
Once Darr sold his house in Stamford—the one purchased with money he received at Josephthal from general partners—First South required him to pay down some of the loan. Effectively, the only money he put in his new house came from general partners. Certain terms of Darr's mortgage loan with First South are described in the certified copy of his mortgage, filed with the town clerk in Greenwich, Connecticut, book number 1414, page 247.

188:
Petty's discussion about having Watson & Taylor pay for Darr's $1,800 weekend in Dallas with his wife from Petty's testimony to the SEC.

189–90:
Information about Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor Ltd. 2 from the prospectus for that investment, dated March 2, 1984.

190:
Details of Darr's investment in Northwest Highway/California Crossing Joint Venture from the Locke Purnell report, cited above.

190:
Sales points on Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor Ltd. 2 from an undated fact sheet distributed by the Direct Investment Group to Prudential-Bache brokers throughout the country.

190:
The performance of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor Ltd. 2 from
The Perspective
, a publication of Partnership Profiles Inc., April 1993.

192–93:
Quinn's telephone call to Barry Breeman is described by Breeman in his deposition of December 2, 1992, in
First
v.
Prudential-Bache
.

Information on 680 Fifth Avenue Associates from the prospectus of that partnership.

193–94:
Some details on the Barbizon investment offered to Prudential-Bache executives from the February 1984 brochure on the deal sent to Darr from Michael Walters, a marketer with Harrison Freedman.

193:
A copy of Darr's letter of February 27, 1984, to Walters was obtained by the author.

194:
Details of Harrison's purchases in 1983 from copies of his receipts and credit card bills, both of which were obtained by the author. Specifically, they include the December 12, 1983, receipt for the satinwood table and mahogany clock from Manheim Galleries of Dallas.

194:
Darr's solicitation of Prudential-Bache executives, including George Ball, for investment in the Harrison deal from a March 30, 1984, memo written by Darr and obtained by the author.

The Prudential-Bache executives who invested in the second Barbizon deal and assumed Harrison's debt are named in a December 9, 1985, letter from Carnegie Realty Capital Corporation to Steven B. Lipton. In the end, the loan would prove tortuous. Darr himself skipped payments he owed on the loan, but Carnegie never took action against him. In 1987, Darr paid off the loan and all of his past-due interest payments. That same year, Harrison, who paid nothing back on the loan, was sued by Carnegie for defaulting. The court ruled in favor of Carnegie. Darr's repeated failure to pay his interest on the Carnegie loan is described in an October 17, 1986, letter to him from Carnegie demanding payment. According to the letter, Darr failed to pay interest payments of $13,715.75 and $14,178.08 that were due on May 1, 1986, and August 1, 1986. The letter does not threaten Darr with any action if he fails to pay.

Terms of the Harrison deal for Prudential-Bache executives are described in “Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of CSH-BHP Limited Partnership,” a document filed with the Texas secretary of state on November 5, 1984.

195:
Walters's “merry men” letter of March 26, 1984, to Howard Feinsand was obtained by the author.

196:
Darr's orders to change the Madison Plaza video are described on an invoice to the Direct Investment Group, dated February 7, 1984.

Other books

What Would Mr. Darcy Do? by Abigail Reynolds
2 Whispering by Amanda M. Lee
Letters by Saul Bellow