The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (10 page)

Read The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 Online

Authors: Robert Middlekauff

Tags: #History, #Military, #United States, #Colonial Period (1600-1775), #Americas (North; Central; South; West Indies)

 

There were other circumstances distinguishing American politics, and several more important than the English connection in giving them form and substance. Representative government prevailed in all thirteen colonies, and representation was virtually always tied to land. Since even by the middle of the eighteenth century land was still fairly easy to acquire, a majority of white adult males could exercise the vote in provin-

 

____________________

20

Patricia Bonomi,
A Factious People: Politics and Society in Colonial New York
( New York, 1971), 196-97.

21

Gregory A. Stiverson,
Poverty in a Land of Plenty: Tenancy in Eighteenth-Century Maryland
( Baltimore, 1977), 28-84, 137-42.

cial elections. Outright ownership -- fee simple -- was not always among the qualifications required of a voter. A leasehold brought the right to vote in New York, where thousands of tenants trooped to the polls on election day.
22

 

Like the English government, the American divided up the spoils of office, kept the peace, and most of the time at least kept order. But they did more. Colonial assemblies had their versions of Lord Boodle, though the Boodles of America were never lords. These worthies usually held forth in the lower houses, where the real power lay by 1750. The American Boodles worried over much more than the division of political offices. The political loaves and fishes did not amount to much in the colonies, and what there was fell to some dim secretary of state in England or occasionally the royal governor, to distribute. Boodles in America chased bigger game -- land which might be held for speculation or seated in plantations. They also had contracts to award, contracts for the supplies and equipment needed in the frequent wars of the century, contracts for roads, bridges, wharves, and other facilities essential to a developing economy.

 

These activities suggest that colonial governments had much to do compared with their English counterpart, and thirteen little Parliaments, as the assemblies liked to style themselves, offered lively arenas for their energies. With so much at stake the assemblies often found themselves the scene of considerable conflict. And indeed a factionalism sometimes described as noisy and turbulent marked most of their proceedings in the years before the Revolution. But not every colony found itself divided or disturbed by factions. Virginia, one of the greatest of all the colonies, sometimes enjoyed lively elections, but its politics were usually tranquil. A landed elite ran things, most often in the interest of a broad public and only occasionally in its own. Political life followed a course equally calm in New Hampshire in the twenty-five years before the passage of the Stamp Act in 1765 because Benning Wentworth and an elite were in charge. Wentworth and an aristocracy composed of relatives and friends dominated political life in New Hampshire between 1741 and 1767 as no other group did elsewhere. Liberal in dispensing political patronage and grants of land, Wentworth relied on a satisfied Council and judiciary to help him run the government. The lower house also learned to admire him as its members received land -- once an entire township -- and flattering attention.
Wentworth did not just bribe his

 

____________________

22

Chilton Williamson,
American Suffrage from Property to Democracy, 1760-1860
( Princeton, N.J., 1960), 13, 17-28.

way into the affections of his constituents, he protected their interests, especially their interests in the trade in masts, lumber, and ships. The mast trade and lumber business so consumed labor in New Hampshire that grain sometimes had to be imported. Protecting this trade, often meant that Wentworth had to violate his instructions which called on him to protect the king's right to the woods. Wentworth never seemed to mind; nor apparently did anyone else in New Hampshire, where safe and stable government prevailed.
23

 

The tranquility that distinguished the politics of Virginia and New Hampshire, and one or two others, set them apart from most colonies. Next door to New Hampshire, politics in Massachusetts followed a course common to most of the colonies with factions struggling for control. In Massachusetts, as elsewhere, much of the strife twisted around the governor, who normally led a miserable life. One of those of the early part of the century, Joseph Dudley, deserved his fate; although his successors, Samuel Shute, William Burnet, and Jonathan Belcher, did not, they endured even more savage struggles with local factions. William Shirley, who served as governor between 1741 and 1757, enjoyed political peace because he had wars with France to fight. Those wars armed him with patronage and contracts to distribute, means he used to disarm his opposition.
24

 

Not even war could keep Pennsylvania's factions from tearing at one another during much of the eighteenth century. As in Massachusetts, the governor customarily absorbed many blows. But the governor of Pennsylvania had his own peculiar problems -- he was the representative of an absentee proprietor, one of the heirs of William Penn, who refused to allow his large holdings of land to be taxed. On the eve of the agitation of the 1760s, disenchantment with Thomas Penn, who had acceded to the proprietorship in 1746, had reached an intensity that led Benjamin Franklin and others to attempt to persuade the Crown to take over the colony's government.
25
Franklin failed, but his effort hardly contributed to a politics of calm.

 

____________________

23

Charles S. Sydnor,
Gentlemen Freeholders: Political Practices in Washington's Virginia
( Chapel Hill, N.C., 1952),
passim.
Jere Daniell, "Politics in New Hampshire under Governor Benning Wentworth, 1741-1767,"
WMQ
, 3d Ser., 23 ( 1966), 76-105.

24

John A. Schutz,
William Shirley
( Chapel Hill, N.C., 1961).

25

James H. Hutson,
Pennsylvania Politics, 1746-1770: The Movement for Royal Government and Its Consequences
( Princeton, N.J., 1972). For an earlier period of Pennsylvania's politics, see Alan Tully,
William Penn's Legacy: Politics and Social Structure in Provincial Pennsylvania, 1726-1755
( Baltimore, 1977). Tully discounts conflict in Pennsylvania politics in an interesting and valuable book.

New Yorkers found other reasons for dividing into factions which contested with one another as vigorously as they did with the royal governor. Rhode Island elected its governor and scarcely even saw a royal official other than those in the Customs service. But factions appeared nonetheless and added to the colony's reputation of crankiness. Maryland and North Carolina differed from Rhode Island in many ways, and from one another, but periodically they too tied themselves and their governor in factional knots.
26

 

Factions nourished themselves from offices and from the resources in the hands of the powerful. They also drew sustenance from conflict, but they did not tear the political society apart. They recognized that limits existed and that exceeding them might bring the political system to collapse. For there were rules by which the factional game was played. The rules barred the use of violence against the opposition. The colonial Boodle knew enough history to recognize the dangers of force. In the seventeenth century most of the major colonies had endured rebellion. Such upheaval dismayed men of the next century who also knew of the English Civil War. They recognized that there was much at stake -political offices, an undeveloped continent, and social order itself. The opportunities for able men to grab and then to grab more enticed many into unprincipled action and made for political struggle. But these opportunities also helped keep them in bounds, made them reluctant to go too far, and made them wary of conflict over principles from which there would be no turning back.

 

Factionalism thus took form in the enveloping stability of the century. The forces that made for conflict, paradoxically, contributed to political order as well. In the colonial constituencies, for example, most white men could vote. A large electorate could induce strenuous electioneering, but it gave men a sense that they had been included within the political system. Governments with considerable powers may have tempted men to strive to control them, but they also induced restraint, an accommodation to the reality of the relationships among the institutions of society.

 

The sense of these relationships in the eighteenth century was weaker

 

____________________

26

Among many excellent books on New York, Stanley N. Katz,
Newcastle's New York: Anglo-American Politics, 1732-1753
( Cambridge, Mass., 1968) stands out. For Rhode Island, see Lovejoy,
Rhode Island Politics; for Maryland, Charles Barker, The Background of the Revolution in Maryland
( New Haven, Conn., 1940) and Donnell M. Owings,
His Lordship's Patronage: Offices of Profit in Colonial Maryland
( Baltimore, 1953); for North Carolina, Jack P. Greene,
The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689-1776
( Chapel Hill, N.C., 1953). The best general account is Bernard Bailyn,
The Origins of American Politics
( New York, 1968).

than it had been when the colonies were founded, but it retained importance nonetheless. At its heart lay the belief that the agencies of the state were connected to all other institutions -- families, churches, even schools and colleges. The precise nature of the connections appeared indistinct, yet the connections were there. Men of affairs undoubtedly took reassurance from the persistence of patrician leadership, for in virtually every colonial institution the "better sort" led the way. This leadership, drawn from the comfortable classes generation after generation, gave evidence to lesser men of the permanence of society and political institutions.

 

Thus colonial politics and society contained some contradictions and some surprising agreements and unities. Though dominated by property owners and entrepreneurs, the economy remained colonial -- subject to regulation from abroad which aimed among other things to restrict its growth. Yet it grew nonetheless. Society on the eve of the Revolution was heavily English in composition; yet it had absorbed large numbers of migrants from the European continent. The political order, modeled in rough on the representative institutions of England, was presided over by governors who, except in Connecticut and Rhode Island, were appointed in the home country. Yet local interests managed to get their way in most matters despite instructions to the contrary that these governors carried with them. And though eagerness to govern themselves often led the American colonials to fall into factions, they observed rules that made politics tolerable.

 
V

Religion, especially after 1740, displayed similar contradictions. In nine colonies an established church -- one that received public taxes -- held forth. But the most fervent believers remained outside its doors with no intention of applying for admission. They followed the call of the Spirit and despised the formality and the rationalism -- they called it sin -- in the established bodies. Even these enthusiasts differed among themselves on many matters. The sacraments aroused disagreements, as did the qualifications of their clergy, the education of their children, and the order of worship.
27

 

Congregationalists with a desire for purity had settled New England in the seventeenth century, and they continued to insist on their version of it for themselves, though not for others, in the eighteenth. After the turn of the century they had to contend with increasingly powerful

 

____________________

27

For the background of religion in early America, see Sidney E. Ahlstrom,
A Religious History of the American People
( New Haven, Conn., 1972.

Other books

The Girl in the Box 01 - Alone by Crane, Robert J.
Heroes of the Valley by Jonathan Stroud
Maelstrom by Taylor Anderson
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez, Gregory Rabassa
My Heart's in the Highlands by Angeline Fortin
Always Love a Villain on San Juan Island by Sandy Frances Duncan, George Szanto
Plain Wisdom by Cindy Woodsmall