Read The Lost Art of Listening Online
Authors: Michael P. Nichols
him feel understood and taken into account. Here are a couple of exam-
ples:
A few years ago a colleague who was editing a book on psychoanalytic
therapy changed jobs and asked me to take over for him. I was delighted—
until I saw that most of the chapters weren’t very good. It was hard for me,
a young and relatively unknown psychologist, to convince the authors,
who were big shots, to do the necessary work. One of the authors, however,
was very solicitous. He called every week to ask how the book was com-
ing and even offered to be my coeditor. Then I read his chapter. It wasn’t
the worst, but it was close. Trying to be diplomatic, I returned the manu-
script, praising its strong points and asking for a few minor changes. Three
months went by. Then I received a letter thanking me for my “suggestions”
Empathy Begins with Openness
165
but saying that a couple of his friends had read over his chapter and agreed
with him that it was just fine the way it was. Arghh!
After counting to ten (about twenty times), I wrote saying that he
seemed upset about something and I was interested in hearing about it. He
called the day he received my letter and told me with a lot of feeling how
hard he’d worked on his chapter and how much rewriting the previous
editor had already put him through. I didn’t really have to say anything.
He was so appreciative of my listening to him that as soon as he finished
complaining he thanked me for being understanding and said he’d be glad
to make the changes I’d asked for.
Frankly, I hadn’t really been interested in this man’s feelings, but to be
able to negotiate with him, I had to hear him out first, or he never would
have been receptive.
With someone you do care about, empathic openness is more than a
useful strategy. It’s the essential means of discovering what things look like
from inside that person’s world.
Linda knew Andrew didn’t like to spend time with her. He was mar-
ried to his career. That’s why she’d developed so many outside interests
over the years. Now that the children had gone off into the wide world,
Linda began to sense the marriage entering its second death. Maybe it was
time to turn off the life supports. She dreamed of freedom. What had she
expected when she married? Attention, shared interests, affection, con-
versation. What she had was what she did on her own.
And Andrew? After years of professional success, he was becoming a
failure at loneliness. He longed to be closer to Linda, to share something
more than domestic arrangements. He dreamed of love. Unfortunately,
they’d gotten out of the habit of talking. He went about his business wear-
ing the armor of indifference.
When Linda came to see me—maybe a therapist would tell her what
she wanted to hear—I tried to point out one reason she felt stuck: she
wasn’t open to the possibility of trying to talk to her husband, trying to
rekindle some basis for staying together other than sharing children.
Linda had assumed that nothing would change and so it would be a
waste of time talking to Andrew. When Linda tried to open up and talk
to Andrew, she found out that he had assumed she no longer wanted to be
involved with him, so he didn’t say anything.
Such assumptions are protective. They keep us from getting our hopes
166
GETTING THROUGH TO EACH OTHER
up and our feelings hurt. But they also keep us from getting through to
each other.
Most of our assumptions about why communication
breaks down are about the other guy. We take our own
input for granted.
After their talk Linda and Andrew did get a little closer. Not a lot, but
enough to make a difference. Shared understanding was the first step.
Openness may be the key to listening, but not total openness, as in
a blank screen. Real receptivity must be informed by sensitivity to other
people.
Sensitivity: Expectations at Their Best
One of the things we learn after a while— sometimes a long while—is
that different people have different emotional needs. If, for example, you
need time alone when you’re upset, it might be hard to remember that in
the same circumstances the first thing your partner wants is to talk. Peo-
ple also have different ways of communicating. To be a good listener you
have to be sensitive to other people’s conversational styles. The automatic
rhythms and nuances of a person’s conversational style include such things
as whether descriptions are detailed or abbreviated, whether the pace of
speaking is fast or slow, and whether who-said-what-to-whom or what-I’m-
working-on-now is the preferred topic.
To Naomi, loud, overlapping talk was an indication of enthusiasm
and mutual involvement. To Wardell, it was a sign of rudeness and not
listening.
Hannah wants details; Ivan feels interrogated.
Rick wants Sherry to get to the point. To her it feels like he isn’t inter-
ested in what she has to say.
Veronica likes to talk things over. She complains that Chet is always
leaving the room. Chet replies that Veronica says something and he
Empathy Begins with Openness
167
responds, then when he goes to finish what he was about to do, she gets
mad.
Listening between intimates often erodes over time because the only
way they know to solve problems is to talk things out. But when commu-
nication styles clash, talking doesn’t help. Trying harder, if it means doing
more of the same, only makes matters worse.
People who communicate indirectly feel that people close to them
should understand how they feel. Direct communicators think, “We should
be able to tell each other what we want.”
Being sensitive to other people’s conversational ways doesn’t mean
you have to have them all figured out. It means you should be receptive.
If you’re used to a New York City pace and you’re listening to a languid
southern speaker whose conversation is like an old hound dog that stops at
every tree, relax. Be patient. You might even get to enjoy the differences.
Unfortunately, when conversational styles differ, misunderstandings
multiply. It’s difficult to straighten out such differences if you’re convinced
of the rightness of your position and the wrongness of the other’s.
Belinda was with her husband at a New Year’s Eve party at his parents’
house. Halfway through the evening, Belinda’s mother-in-law came over
and whispered, “Loosen up, have some fun. Don’t be so formal!”
Belinda was annoyed. She had been having fun. She’d had several
enjoyable conversations with her husband’s cousins. She wasn’t being for-
mal; she was being herself.
Belinda was pissed.
Who does that woman think she is? Did I say anything
to her about cackling hysterically whenever anybody said something?
In fact,
Belinda found the mother-in-law’s loud show of emotion and high- pitched
chatter jarring. It wasn’t her style.
Both of these people were behaving in self- evidently appropriate
ways, the ways they were brought up to behave.
Some people consider their restrained style of speaking “polite.” They
find people with a more expressive style “crude,” “loud,” “histrionic,” “vul-
gar.” More emotive speakers think of themselves as “open and honest,”
“warm,” “friendly,” while they think of more restrained speakers as “aloof,”
“standoffish,” “distant.”
168
GETTING THROUGH TO EACH OTHER
(Notice, incidentally, how Belinda and her mother-in-law each
addressed their differences in character. The mother-in-law was “honest”
or “rude,” depending on your point of view. Belinda was “polite” or “aloof,”
as you see it.)
Sensitivity means being responsive to other people’s feelings. It
doesn’t mean assuming you know what they’re going to say; it means being
interested enough to find out. On the other hand, sensitivity does mean
using your knowledge of other people to understand their perspective and
respect their individuality.
Some of the ways you can show sensitivity are:
• Paying attention to what the other person is saying
• Acknowledging the other person’s feelings
• Listening before giving an opinion
• Listening without offering advice
• Listening without immediately agreeing or disagreeing
• Noticing how the other person appears to be feeling—and then
asking
• Asking about his or her day, both before and after
• Respecting a person’s need for quiet times
• Respecting a person’s need to address problems
• Listening to but not pushing too hard for feelings
Maybe you won’t get through to some people as long as you
keep approaching them the same way you always do.
We’re Most Insensitive to Those We Love
What makes someone insensitive to what others are saying? To figure out
why a listener becomes reactive instead of listening, consider where the
person’s anxiety might be coming from. Sometimes anxiety comes from
stress—real or imagined. People resist both actual and threatened change.
We think of powerful people as dominating relationships and perhaps
therefore not willing to listen, but in fact it’s often the powerless who have
trouble listening. A man who feels that his opinions about the children
Empathy Begins with Openness
169
aren’t respected may resist his wife’s efforts to talk about them. A woman
who doesn’t feel entitled to say what she wants (and doesn’t want) may
resist her husband’s attempts to discuss sex. Most people begin to listen
better once they realize what power they do have in a relationship.
On the other hand, sometimes a person who clearly seems to have
power in a relationship—a parent, say, or a dominating spouse—still
doesn’t listen. When a dominant person doesn’t listen, it’s usually because
some hidden emotional issue is present, making him or her anxious.
One afternoon Tommy came home from school with so much rest-
less energy that he decided to mow the lawn. The machine plowed into
the deep grass, releasing its familiar sweet smell. But Tommy hadn’t gone
ten feet when the mower stalled, its blade clogged with wet grass. After
several frustrating starts and stops, he shoved the insubordinate machine
back into the garage, stomped into the house cursing and banging, went
upstairs, and slammed his door.
By this time Tommy’s parents were home. When his father asked what
was the matter, Tommy told him about his lousy day at school, then com-
ing home and the lawn mower not working. He was frustrated and angry.
Instead of empathizing, his father gave him a lecture. “When you
have a problem, it doesn’t do anybody any good to lose control and start
yelling. You have to stop and be calm. Nothing is accomplished when you
get upset.” As his father went on, Tommy’s head sank slowly to his chest.
“You can’t cut grass when it’s a foot high and be in a hurry. You’ve
got to go through it very, very slow. You can’t bull your way through
anything— including life.”
Tommy tried to explain. “Yeah, but when you’ve had a bad day at
school and you come home and everything goes wrong, your anger keeps
building. You’ve got to let it out somehow.”
“Remember what we talked about last night? About problems? What
did I say?”
“You said you’ve got to swallow your tongue.” Tommy had stopped look-
ing for sympathy and was now just trying to hang on to some of his pride.
But his father wasn’t finished. “I also told you that problems when
they’re compounded make bigger problems. But if you take that problem
and break it down, and make individual problems out of it, you can usually
solve them very easily. Remember we talked about that?”
170
GETTING THROUGH TO EACH OTHER
Tommy gave up trying to explain himself, and the conversation was
finished.
This is a story of a father’s failure to listen. The father asks his son why
he’s upset and then, when the boy tries to tell him, instead of listening,
gives him a speech on the futility of anger, a lecture for a course the boy
didn’t sign up for. Tommy attempted to explain his feelings because he was
looking for understanding. Instead he became a captive audience forced to
listen to an account of his own inadequacies.
What’s so hurtful in this encounter (and others like it) isn’t that the
father has a different perspective from his son; it’s that, because of the feel-
ings his son’s behavior arouses in him, he tries to allay his own anxieties
by pushing his perspective on the boy. In this scenario, Father knows best;
Tommy’s perspective carries no weight. It’s never even acknowledged. The
real impact of Father’s lessons for living may be that Tommy grows up to
be one of those people, like his father, with didactic views on everything—
and unable to listen.
But
why
was Tommy’s father so unable to listen to him explain why he
was upset? What was so threatening? Anger.