Authors: Michel Farnac
As
it
happens
she
had
several
days
before
having
to
write
an
answer
as
Michel
was
going
on
vacation
for
a
week
away
from
electronic
devices,
and
this
allowed
her
to
digest
his
latest
message.
The
first
reading
of
it
left
her
a
bit
bewildered.
Luckily,
she
very
reluctantly
yielded
to
her
husband’s
advances
that
night
and
she
found
herself
observing
him
as
he
reached
climax
with
incomplete
recollections
from
a
single
reading
of
Michel’s
description
hovering
in
her
mind.
She
felt
the
pulsing
as
his
orgasm
began
and
heard
him
faintly
yelp
as
the
discharge
started
in
earnest.
When
he
quickly
pulled
away
thereafter,
rather
than
feel
her
usual
annoyance
the
words
“primitive
armor”
made
her
giggle,
and
her
husband
smiled
at
the
sound
of
her
laughter
from
the
depth
of
the
cave
where
he
lay.
The
next
day
she
reread
Michel’s
note
several
times
and
each
reading
made
the
text
more
familiar
and
more
mysterious,
drawing
out
her
curiosity.
She
wrote
thoughts
and
questions
down
on
a
pad
in
preparation
for
her
response
which
led
to
an
amusing
incident
involving
her
boss
nearly
taking
the
pad
saying
“I
need
your
notes
from
this
morning’s
meeting.”
That
night
she
pleasured
her
husband
of
her
own
initiative
and
as
he
slept
she
crept
downstairs
to
pour
herself
a
glass
of
wine
before
going
out
into
the
warm
air
of
a
beautiful
summer
night
in
her
garden.
She
had
to
admit
that
she
had
never
had
so
much
pleasure
watching
her
husband
have
an
orgasm.
Of
course,
early
on
in
their
marriage
she
had
enjoyed
given
him
pleasure,
mostly
because
of
the
feeling
of
power
she
derived
from
it,
from
knowing
that
she
could
do
this,
accomplish
this
seemingly
at
will.
But
when
the
novelty
of
it
died
off,
his
orgasms
turned
into
something
quite
different
for
her,
mainly
a
signal
that
their
lovemaking
session
was
at
an
end,
most
often
leaving
her
frustrated
to
the
point
where
it
had
in
her
mind
almost
become
a
nuisance,
either
something
she
did
to
“make
him
happy”
in
the
sense
of
“make
him
go
away”
or
something
that
came
too
soon
after
too
little
foreplay.
Her
façade
of
impeccable
propriety
as
an
outstanding
member
of
the
community
to
which
she
was
so
devoted
precluded
her
having
the
type
of
friend
with
whom
by
confiding
she
would
have
understood
that
when
it
comes
to
marital
sex,
hers
was
a
rather
common
plight.
Michel’s
words
were
powerful
and
she
wanted
to
somehow
feel
the
orgasm
he
was
describing,
but
with
her
husband
she
lacked
the
kind
of
empathy
it
would
have
required
and
so
was
reduced
to
observation.
Regardless,
she
realized
that
since
her
husband
tended
to
stop
halfway
through
what
Michel
wrote
of,
she
would
have
to
turn
to
the
author
to
get
a
deeper
understanding
of
the
much
more
interesting
second
half
of
the
text.
There
will
be
no
better
or
worse
time
than
now
to
point
out
that
not
all
was
always
perfect
between
the
two
of
them,
but
rather
that
the
occasional
moment
of
friction
was
always
easily
overcome
with
openness
and
effusive
reciprocal
apologies
in
subsequent
messages.
She
would
volunteer
that
she
had
“annoying
female
characteristics”
while
he
admitted
to
being
“a
man
after
all,
with
the
many
nasty
things
this
can
imply
at
times,”
but
both
made
every
effort
to
not
annoy
the
other
in
the
same
way
twice.
She
had
thus
learned
to
not
ask
‘too
many’
questions
at
a
time
and
to
then
wait
for
an
answer
without
badgering
him
about
it.
In
the
end,
he
always
did
answer
though
he
sometimes
had
to
remind
her
of
the
question
given
the
time
elapsed
since
it
had
been
posed.
Mostly.
“Dear
Michel,
I
just
realized
that
you
are
the
only
‘M’
in
my
address
book.
It
is
quite
fitting
that
I
only
have
to
type
in
“M-‐i…”
and
you
magically
appear
at
the
top
of
the
queue,
and
as
I
do
I
often
say
it
out
loud,
and
it
sounds
like
‘Me’.
Our
knowledge
of
each
other
has
grown
to
a
depth
we
could
never
have
imagined.
In
some
ways,
you
know
me
better
than
even
my
husband,
just
as
you
have
told
me
things
that
you
have
shared
with
no-‐one
else.
I
have
read
and
reread
your
‘orgasm’
piece.
As
we’ve
discussed
before,
our
perspectives
on
previous
words,
stories,
movies,
etc.
are
never
static
(at
least
for
people
like
you
and
I).
And
so
my
thoughts
on
this
missive
are
of
course
very
different
from
the
reactions
I
experienced
upon
the
first
reading
just
a
few
days
ago.
Now
a
few
questions:
Do
you
prefer
that
motion
cease
as
of
that
moment?
Does
additional
friction
(either
in
your
partner’s
mouth
or
vagina)
enhance
or
detract…
or
does
it
vary
with
the
circumstance?
I
know,
too
many
questions…
but
I
want
to
seize
the
day!
Fondly,
Catherine”
It
would
be
another
couple
of
days
before
Michel
returned
and
responded.
He
took
great
pleasure
in
answering
her
inquiries.
He
was
proud
that
he
made
her
want
to
seize
the
day.
“Dear
Catherine,
Your
questions
make
me
realize
that
my
description
was
perhaps
a
tad
esoteric,
and
so
it
is
a
pleasure
to
provide
some
answers.
And
first,
indeed
we
can
feel
the
semen
flowing
as
it
does.
It
is
propelled
by
uncontrollable
and
orgasmic
contraction
at
the
base
of
the
shaft.
But
the
first
few
contractions
are
blanks,
in
a
sense,
and
only
at
the
third
or
fourth
does
the
lava
flow.
Anything
other
than
a
gentle
cupping
of
the
balls
can
be
distracting,
but
gentle
cupping
pressure,
especially
to
the
back
of
the
testicles,
rather
enhances
the
experience.
As
to
motion,
it
is
quite
essential
during
the
orgasm
itself,
but
shortly
thereafter,
things
get
a
little
more
complicated.
Here
again,
circumcision
makes
a
big
difference.
The
tip
of
the
cock
becomes
very
sensitive
in
the
aftermath
of
ejaculation,
and
stimulation
at
this
point
can
become
uncomfortable,
even
painful,
but
much
less
so
for
circumcised
men.
I
think
that
might
explain
some
of
the
more
striking
differences
between
European
and
American
porno
flicks.
Finally,
while
there
are
better
and
worse
orgasms,
what
I
described
is
pretty
much
the
template
for
what
I
experience,
with
the
caveat
that
you
know
about
masturbation
versus
sex
with
a
partner.
Yours,
Michel”
When
next
they
spoke,
she
admitted
to
him
that
her
own
pleasure
seemed
to
her
very
meek
in
comparison
with
his,
and
how
would
she
react
to
being
present
at
such
an
event?
He
laughed
and
told
her
that
he
could
only
judge
from
his
wife's
reaction
to
this:
a
good
deal
of
satisfaction
and
the
occasional
unsuppressed
giggle.
He
described
himself
as
a
cross
between
a
penguin
walking
on
a
waxed
floor
and
a
puppy
dog
being
scratched
a
little
too
vigorously,
and
thought
she
would
probably
find
it
amusing
and
hopefully
a
little
endearing.
His
breathing
pattern
kind
of
freaked
his
wife
out
the
first
few
times
because
there
was
a
point
after
orgasm
when
he
stopped
breathing
for
a
few
seconds,
but
she
got
used
to
it.
It
was
all
a
matter
of
letting
the
pleasure
resonate
to
its
fullest.
Catherine
again
questioned
him
about
the
intensity
of
it
and
he
tried
to
add
some
nuance
to
his
answer.
The
way
he
felt
it,
there
had
to
be
essentially
a
gradation
in
the
pleasures
that
could
be
had
from
ejaculation.
He
had
been
caught
once
in
the
unpleasant
situation
of
needing
to
cut
short
ill-‐timed
self-‐pleasuring
only
to
find
that
the
point
of
no-‐return
had
been
reached,
and
this
seemed
to
mark
the
minimum
amount
of
pleasure
that
he
could
get
from
an
orgasm:
“It
was
as
if
the
duality
that
is
usually
resolved
at
the
time
of
orgasm
between
the
locus
of
pleasure
in
the
testicles
and
the
rest
of
the
body
was
suddenly
restored
with
the
body
pretending
that
the
orgasm
was
not
happening,
adrenaline
pumping
through
the
veins,
sweating
with
fear,
hyper-‐alert,
and
at
the
same
time
waves
of
pleasure
completely
contained
to
the
testes,
barely
finding
their
way
into
the
brain
because
unable
to
overcome
the
sympathetic
nervous
system’s
reluctance
to
cede
way
to
pleasure.”