Authors: Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
12. Information on the Facilitator that Led to the UBL Operation
Shortly after the raid on the Usama bin Ladin (UBL) compound on May 1, 2011, which resulted in UBL’s death, CIA officials described the role of reporting from the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program in the operation—and in some cases connected the reporting to the use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques.
2137
The vast majority of the documents, statements, and testimony highlighting information obtained from the use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques, or from CIA detainees more generally, was inaccurate and incongruent with CIA records.
CIA records indicate that: (1) the CIA had extensive reporting on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti (variant Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti),
2138
the UBL facilitator whose identification and tracking led to the identification of UBL’s compound and the operation that resulted in UBL’s death, prior to and independent of information from CIA detainees; (2) the most accurate information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti obtained from a CIA detainee was provided by a CIA detainee who had not yet been subjected to the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques; and (3) CIA detainees who were subjected to the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques withheld and fabricated information about Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti.
Within days of the raid on UBL’s compound, CIA officials represented that CIA detainees provided the “tip off”
2139
information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti.
2140
A review of CIA records found that the initial intelligence obtained, as well as the information the CIA identified as the most critical—or the most valuable—on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti,
2141
was not related to the use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques.
2142
The CIA did not receive any information from CIA detainees on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti until 2003. Nonetheless, by the end of 2002, the CIA was actively targeting Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti and had collected significant reporting on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti—to include reporting on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti’s close links to UBL. CIA records indicate that prior to receiving any information from CIA detainees, the CIA had collected:
Within a day of the UBL operation, the CIA began providing classified briefings to Congress on the overall operation and the intelligence that led to the raid and UBL’s death.
2165
On May 2, 2011, CIA officials, including CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell, briefed the Committee. A second briefing occurred on May 4, 2011, when CIA Director Leon Panetta and other CIA officials briefed both the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Armed Services Committee. Both of these briefings indicated that CIA detainee information—and the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques—played a substantial role in developing intelligence that led to the UBL operation. The testimony contained significant inaccurate information.
For example, in the May 2, 2011, briefing, the CIA informed the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that:
“However, there remained one primary line of investigation that was proving the most difficult to run to ground, and that was the case of a courier named Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti. Abu Ahmed had totally dropped off our radar in about the 2002–2003 time frame
after several detainees in our custody
had highlighted him as a key facilitator for bin Ladin.”
2166
The information above is not fully congruent with CIA records. As described, the CIA was targeting Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti prior to any reporting from CIA detainees. Al-Kuwaiti was identified as early as 2002 as an al-Qa’ida member engaged in operational planning who “traveled frequently” to see UBL.
2167
No CIA detainee provided reporting on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti in 2002. While CIA detainees eventually did provide some information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti beginning in the spring of 2003, the majority of the accurate intelligence acquired on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti was collected outside of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program, either from detainees not in CIA custody, or from other intelligence sources and methods unrelated to detainees, to include human sources and foreign partners.
2168
The most accurate CIA detainee-related intelligence was obtained in early 2004, from a CIA detainee who had not yet been subjected to the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques.
2169
That detainee—Hassan Ghul—listed Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti as one of three individuals likely to be with UBL,
2170
stated that “it was well known that [UBL] was always with Abu Ahmed [al-Kuwaiti],”
2171
and described al-Kuwaiti as UBL’s “closest assistant,”
2172
who “likely handled all of UBL’s needs.”
2173
The detainee further relayed that he believed “UBL’s security apparatus would be minimal, and that the group likely lived in a house with a family somewhere in Pakistan.”
2174
In the May 4, 2011, briefing, CIA Director Leon Panetta provided the following statement to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Armed Services Committee (which mirrored similar statements by a “senior administration official” in a White House Press Briefing from May 2, 2011)
2175
:
‘‘
The detainees
in the post-9/11 period flagged for us that there were individuals that provided direct support to bin Ladin . . .
and one of those identified was a courier who had the nickname Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti. That was back in 2002
.”
2176
As previously detailed, no CIA detainees provided information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti in 2002. As such, for the statement to be accurate, it can only be a reference to detainees in foreign government custody who provided information in 2002.
2177
As noted, prior to any reporting from CIA detainees, the CIA was targeting Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti—to include al-Kuwaiti’s phone number and email address.
2178
Further, prior to 2003, the CIA possessed a body of intelligence reporting linking Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti to KSM and UBL and to operational targeting of the United States, as well as reporting that Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti was “one of a few close associates of Usama bin Ladin”
2179
and “traveled frequently” to “meet with Usama bin Ladin.”
2180
In the same May 4, 2011, briefing, a CIA officer elaborated on the previously provided statements and provided additional detail on how “a couple of early detainees” “identi[fied]” Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti as someone close to UBL:
“I think the clearest way to think about this is, in 2002
a couple of early detainees, Abu Zubaydah and an individual, Riyadh the Facilitator, talked about the activities of an Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti
. At this point we don’t have his true name.
And they identify him as somebody involved with AQ and facilitation and some potential ties to bin Ladin
.”
2181
This testimony is inaccurate. There are no CIA records of Abu Zubaydah discussing Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti in 2002.
2182
The first reference to Abu Zubaydah providing information related to al-Kuwaiti is on July 7, 2003, when Abu Zubaydah denied knowing the name.
2183
CIA records indicate that the information in 2002 that the CIA has represented as the initial lead information on Abu Ahmad al-Kuwaiti was not obtained from the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program, but was collected by the CIA from other intelligence sources, including from detainees in foreign government custody. Riyadh the Facilitator provided substantial information on Abu Ahmad alKuwaiti in 2002, including information suggesting al-Kuwaiti may have served as a courier, as al-Kuwaiti reportedly “traveled frequently” to see UBL.
2184
Consistent with the testimony, CIA records indicate that the information provided by Riyadh the Facilitator was important information; however, Riyadh the Facilitator was not in CIA custody in 2002, but was in the custody of a foreign government.
2185
Riyadh the Facilitator was not transferred to CIA custody until January █, 2004.
2186
As noted, in 2002, the CIA received additional reporting from another detainee in the custody of a foreign government, Abu Zubair al-Ha’ili, that “Ahmad al-Kuwaiti” was “one of a few close associates of Usama bin Ladin.”
2187
At the May 4, 2011, briefing, a Senator asked, “I guess what we’re trying to get at here, or certainly I am, was any of this information obtained through [enhanced] interrogation measures?” A CIA officer replied: