Read Knocking on Heaven's Door: The Path to a Better Way of Death Online
Authors: Katy Butler
Tags: #Non-Fiction
father napped, she asked me for the first time to help her get
the pacemaker turned off. I was witnessing a double drowning,
but it was still not easy saying yes.
After tea she phoned the cardiologist, Dr. Rogan. “I’ve got to
see you while my daughter is here,” she said. “It’s urgent.” She
had a touching faith that my brainy assertiveness could succeed
where hers had failed. But Dr. Rogan was leaving that day on
vacation. He did not have time to meet. She wrung from him a
promise to call us back.
At five, the phone rang. My mother asked Dr. Rogan to wait
until I could get to the phone in the guest bedroom, but he said
he was in a rush. I ran upstairs knowing that I had perhaps five
minutes to talk to a man I’d never met about doing whatever I
could to hasten my father’s death.
KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 190
1/31/13 12:27 PM
knocking on heaven’s door
191
I picked up the receiver and broke in, my voice harsh and
tight. I did not thank him for taking our call, or do any of the
things Dale Carnegie suggested I do to win friends and influ-
ence people. Instead I blurted out, “I’ll cut to the chase.” Even
if we got a court order, I said, I sensed that he wanted no part
in what we had in mind. Dr. Rogan paused and said, “That’s
right.” He’d feel okay about not replacing the pacemaker’s bat-
tery when it ran down, he said. But turning it off, he said, would
be “too active.” Later he would tell me that it would have been
“like putting a pillow over your father’s head.”
I put down the phone, and my mother and I walked down-
stairs, sat on the sofa, held each other, and shook.
My mother handed me a piece of paper the next morning
with the number of a hairdresser in the mall below Main Street
who cut the hair of the professor in her support group. I took
it. Late that afternoon, sporting a nice, new, chin-length bob, I
sat with my mother in the small, brightly lit waiting room of Dr.
Fales, their primary care doctor. I’d pulled out my mother’s well-
organized file holding their “durable power of attorney for health
care” documents, and discovered that my father had authorized
my mother and me to make his medical decisions when, in the
sole opinion of Dr. Fales, he could no longer make his own.
On Dr. Fales’s bulletin board was an op-ed piece from the
Hartford Courant
by a fellow internist, fulminating about the
low fees Medicare pays for primary care. Dr. Fales ushered us
into his office. He had opposed the pacemaker from day one.
But turning it off, he said in the fifteen minutes allotted us, was
something else again.
“Don’t do anything that you would later regret,” he said. With-
out the device, my father might get dizzy or faint, fall, break a
hip, and end up in the hospital or a nursing home. “Keep him
out of the hospital at all costs,” he said. “Try not to call 911.” He
looked at my mother, and his eyes filled with tears. “Why don’t
KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 191
1/31/13 12:27 PM
192
katy butler
you just let the battery run out?” he said. “It probably only lasts
five years, and it’s getting close.”
Our time was up, and he came around from his desk and
gave my mother a hug. When we got home, my mother went
into the basement and found a file. The battery of the pace-
maker, implanted when my father was seventy-nine, was said to
have a ten-year life. We had about five years to go.
When my mother was upset, she meditated or cleaned house.
When I was upset, I Googled. That afternoon, I found the 800
number for Compassion and Choices, a successor to the Hem-
lock Society, which had first publicly advanced the notion that
the fatally ill had a right to die without medical interference
and even the right to control the timing of their deaths. Judith
Schwarz, a registered nurse in Manhattan with a PhD in nurs-
ing, called me back. The law was clear, she said. My father had
the right to ask for the withdrawal of
any
medical treatment,
even a tiny embedded device like a pacemaker. My mother and
I, as his designated health care proxies, had the right to insist
his wishes be followed when he could no longer express them.
The cardiologist had an ethical obligation to either deactivate
the device or, if he was morally opposed, to find us someone
who would.
But having legal and moral rights in an era of advanced medi-
cal technology, I learned, was not the same as having practical
power. It’s easy to say yes to a complex device and devilishly dif-
ficult to withdraw that yes. We were at the mercy of a strange
new algorithm: those who knew and loved my father best—Dr.
Fales, my mother, and I—wanted to let him die naturally but
had no power. Those who knew my father least and least under-
stood his suffering were eager to prolong his life and had the
know-how and the power to do so.
And so Judith Schwarz recommended I first do everything
Dr. Rogan asked for, dotting every i and crossing every t
.
I should KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 192
1/31/13 12:27 PM
knocking on heaven’s door
193
find a geriatric psychiatrist to declare my father incapable of
making his own medical decisions. I should ask Dr. Rogan again
to deactivate the device. If he refused, I should insist he find us
someone who would. At the same time, I should search inde-
pendently for a more sympathetic cardiologist. If necessary, we
should go to court.
I was not going to get this done in a week.
My every word must be carefully parsed. Following the dicta
of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Law of Double Effect and centuries
of criminal law, I could not say I wanted to hasten my father’s
death. That could be construed as intent to commit manslaugh-
ter. Instead I had to say that my mother and I wanted to “end all
mechanical interference with my father’s underlying condition.”
I could not say that we wanted what was best for him. We had
to say that “based on our intimate knowledge of his preferences,
we were acting exactly as he would if he could speak for him-
self.” We could not say we believed there were fates worse than
death. The Supreme Court had affirmed, in the Nancy Cruzan
case, that states had an absolute and legitimate interest in the
preservation of life. We could not say that my mother was being
crushed by caregiving. My mother’s suffering had no moral or
legal standing. My father, not our family, was the patient.
I should not be rude or threaten a lawsuit. When family
members become agitated or disruptive, hospital bioethicists
like Katrina Bramstedt may decide that the surrogate lacks
“decision-making capacity” and the medical team may simply
ignore them or go to court and ask to have the troublemaker
removed from the job. If that happened, my father’s medical
proxy wouldn’t be worth the paper it was written on.
In a case Bramstedt reported in 2003 in the online
Inter-
nal Medicine Journal,
she described a medical guardian who
“ranted” and became “agitated and boisterous” in demanding
that her relative be allowed to die. She threatened to bring in
KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 193
1/31/13 12:27 PM
194
katy butler
lawyers, and after her relative developed a hospital-based infec-
tion, tried to “fire” the intensive unit team, including Bramstedt,
the bioethicist. The patient in question, a sixty-nine-year-old
diabetic woman, had been in intensive care for three weeks, on
dialysis and on a respirator, after suffering multiple strokes and
septic shock (an often fatal bloodstream infection) in the after-
math of her second quadruple bypass surgery. In the ICU, she
had picked up another infection from a contaminated line. The
woman was apparently too stroke-damaged to communicate
and was also suffering from congestive heart failure, a slowly
and surely fatal condition.
The patient had done everything my parents had been told to
do. She’d signed a standard living will asking for the discontinu-
ance of life support if she were comatose or expected to die within
six months, In the opinion of the medical team, she was neither.
She’d appointed three relatives to act as her medical surrogates
when she could not speak for herself. But Bramstedt questioned
whether the hostile relative had “decision-making capacity.” The
request for the removal of life support had been “made in tan-
dem with loud and aggressive behavior,” Bramstedt wrote, which
“could be a signal that projection is occurring, the emotional fer-
vor being a possible mechanism of expressing the surrogate’s own
values and preferences,” rather than the patient’s.
The emotional fervor and aggression of the doctors and the
possibility that they were expressing their own values and pref-
erences were not discussed. The doctors kept going, and the
primary family member withdrew from her role as medical sur-
rogate and said that from then on, she would be a “bystander
and a visitor.” The second and third relatives deferred to the
medical team.
After three more weeks of what Bramstedt called “aggressive
treatment” in intensive care, the dying woman was stabilized
enough to be sent to a nursing home. Four days later she was
KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 194
1/31/13 12:27 PM
knocking on heaven’s door
195
brought back to the hospital, feverish, having trouble breath-
ing, and overwhelmed by a second bloodstream infection. This
time the medical team did not put her back on life support.
She died within hours, according to the hospital’s rules, when
the medical team decided it was time for her to die, and not a
moment before. She had spent most of the final six weeks of
her life in intensive care at a cost of hundreds of thousands of
dollars—some of it probably paid by Medicare while the rest
was absorbed by the hospital and passed on to other patients,
indirectly upping health insurance rates—and an uncountable
cost in human suffering.
She spent her last weeks, as Sherwin Nuland put it in
How
We Die,
among:
beeping and squealing monitors, the hissings of respirators
and pistoned mattresses, the flashing multicolored electronic
signals—the whole technological panoply [that] is back-
ground for the tactics by which we are deprived of the tran-
quility we have every right to hope for, and separated from
those few who would not let us die alone.
I wanted to spare my father this.
I didn’t want him to die because I thought he deserved
“death with dignity.” I didn’t think his dignity was the issue. I
didn’t want him to die because I judged his “quality of life” to
be defective, like a misshapen mail-order sweater that slipped
through quality control. I did not think, in the words of the Aus-
tralian philosopher Peter Singer, that some human lives were
“worthy” and others not, and that my father’s life was “unworthy”
because he was badly damaged. My father was disabled in the
eyes of the world before I was born, and I’d felt and expressed
more love for him in his helpless dotage than I ever had in his
intimidating prime.
KnockingHeaven_ARC.indd 195
1/31/13 12:27 PM
196
katy butler
I didn’t want him to die because my mother and I had dis-
passionately weighed “the burdens and benefits of continued
treatment” as if his life and death were competing brands of
refrigerator. We were driven half mad by love and desperation. I
did not want him to die in order to enforce his constitutionally
protected right to privacy and autonomy. I did not want him to
die because I thought he was useless or because I was ageist.
I wanted our family to be held in the loving arms of a larger
human community. I wanted doctors to help us. I wanted him
to die because I loved him. I wanted to stop our family’s suffer-
ing. And to do so, Judith Schwarz told me, I would have to speak
in a foreign tongue and not as a daughter in grief.
We hadn’t created this mess. My father’s drawn-out dying
and my mother’s suffering were the consequence of our cul-
ture’s idolatrous, one-sided worship of Yankee ingenuity and the
can-do spirit. As far as I was concerned, it violated the way of
the universe and it was a moral crime. Why were we the ones
being judged?
I tried to get my father admitted to a hospice program and
learned from a kind nurse on the phone at Middlesex Hospital
that my father had “the dwindles”: he was sick enough never
to get better but not sick enough yet to qualify for Medicare’s
hospice benefit. She asked if he had an official orange plastic
do-not-resuscitate (DNR) bracelet issued by the state of Con-
necticut. Without it, she said, emergency medical technicians
would not honor his paper DNR.
I made another note on my legal pad and again felt like my