Authors: Michel Farnac
“Of
course!
I
want
to
have
sex
with
you,
Catherine,
I
want
to
please
you
above
all.
I
don’t
want
to
dictate
what
you
do.
I
don’t
even
really
want
to
imagine
what
you
do.
And
yes,
maybe
I
want
to
protect
you
from
being
part
of
an
expedient
way
to
reach
an
orgasm.
When
I
think
of
you,
I
think
of
foreplay,
delayed
gratification,
holding
on
as
long
as
I
can.
I
don’t
think
of
a
quickie
because
my
wife
is
getting
impatient.”
“No,
of
course
not”
Michel
answered
laughing.
“Things
are
so
different
in
your
case.
It
seems
that
you
are
forgetting
some
of
the
big
differences
between
a
man
and
a
woman.”
“Well,
yes
and
no:
it
is
not
the
same
pleasure
we
are
seeking.
Your
fantasy
is
meant
to
palliate
your
husband’s,
shall
we
say,
weaknesses?
Mine
is
meant
to
bring
about
orgasm,
which
is
something
that
you
yourself
have
said
was
too
elusive
to
be
provoked
in
such
a
way.”
“Well,
I…
hmm.
Sure.
Well,
aren’t
they?”
“No!
Why
would
they
be?”
“Because
as
you
said
for
men
it
is
often
about
sex
pure
and
simple.
Not
so
for
women,
or
at
least
not
so
for
you.
I
mean
my
fantasies
don’t
involved
getting
whisked
away
into
a
harem,
nor
in
fact
whisking
anyone
into
my
harem
either.”
“So
what
do
they
involve?”
asked
Catherine
as
she
wondered
if
he
realized
how
often
she
did
in
fact
visualize
herself
in
a
harem.
“Well,
look,
it’s
not
like
I’m
proud
of
it
or
anything,
but
you
have
to
understand,
once
again,
this
is
usually
a
means
to
reach
orgasm,
not
to
increase
the
pleasure
of
the
act.
I
mean
let
us
be
quite
clear:
when
I
am
giving
myself
pleasure,
it
is
you
I
fantasize
about.”
“Really?”
“Oh
yes.
Since
we’ve
met.”
And
with
that
she
understood
what
he
meant
by
‘not
graceful’.
The
question
surprised
her
but
she
was
frank:
“Yes,
we’ve
done
that.
Sometimes
when
we
travel
we
find
that
the
television
in
the
room
has
interesting
programming
choices.”
“Yes,”
she
admitted,
“though
I
don’t
really
care
for
it
much.
Well,
I
shouldn’t
say
that,
exactly,
it’s
just
a
bit
of
a
double-‐edged
sword.
For
one,
I’m
never
the
one
to
propose
it.“
“The
first
time
I
said
yes
because
I’d
never
seen
a
porno
before.
I
guess
the
voyeur
in
me
was
intrigued.
I
didn’t
really
know
what
to
expect
and
the
idea
of
watching
other
people
having
sex
did
excite
me
somewhat.
Maybe
I
thought
it
would
lengthen
the
foreplay,
which
it
did.”
“Was
intrigued
and
annoyed
at
the
same
time,
maybe.
It’s
probably
very
cliché,
but
I
had
no
idea
that
you
could
do
some
of
the
things
that
they
do.
At
the
same
time,
I
couldn’t
see
myself
doing
most
of
this
and
it
all
seems
so
contrived
that
it
left
me
wondering.”
“Wondering
what?”
he
asked.
“Well
what
do
men
get
out
of
this?”
“Ooh!
Well
that
would
depend
on
the
man,
to
begin
with.
I
can’t
pretend
that
I
know
all
the
answers
to
that
one,
but
I
do
possess
some
of
them.
First
and
foremost,
it
provides
some
of
us
with
the
opportunity
to
see
beautiful
women
showing
their
beauty
in
accessible
ways
without
any
interaction.
It
is
the
satisfaction
of
a
very
primal
pleasure
without
interference
of
it
into
our
lives.
There
is
a
universality
to
this
that
is
striking.
Believe
it
or
not,
many
men
will
satisfy
themselves
entirely
of
such
vicarious
forms
of
entertainment
without
feeling
the
need
for
anything
more.
Consider
that
in
Japan,
the
basic
cultural
tenet
is
that
as
long
as
a
man
is
paying
for
what
he
is
seeing
and
hearing
and
tasting
and
feeling
(no
touching
allowed)
then
it
is
not
a
betrayal
of
the
marital
vows.”
“We
are
not
at
all
talking
about
prostitution,
only
about
adult
entertainment.
About
fantasy,
ultimately
and
about
how
men
need
a
tangible
connection
to
their
fantasy
where
women
seem
to
seek
an
intangible
dimension
to
it.”
“Well,
where
I
end
up
with
all
this
is
that
what
the
man
seeks
is
a
physical
manifestation
in
his
fantasy:
the
act,
the
contact,
the
basic
sex
itself
is
what
we
seek
in
the
fantasy.
For
you
it
is
the
element
of
narrative
that
is
paramount
in
the
fantasy,
the
dreamscape
of
the
romantic
tryst
on
board
the
pirate
ship,
the
harem,
the
slopes
of
some
Austrian
ski
resort.
But
isn’t
the
backdrop
always
something
that
is
by
construction
not
attainable?”
“You
mean
I’ll
never
get
whisked
away
to
a
harem?”
“Exactly!”
“Safe
because
it
cant’
happen?”
“Yes.”
She
answered
after
a
brief
pause.
“So
your
rationalization
is
that
it’s
OK
as
long
as
it
can’t
happen.”
“Yes.”
She
said
again,
though
this
time
the
pause
was
longer.
“Like
us?”
he
asked.
When
she
said
nothing
he
continued.
“Nothing
is
ever
perfect,
Michel.”
“Of
course
not,
Catherine,
but
that
is
not
a
reason
to
lose
our
sense
of
humor.”
Intermezzo
Their
affair
could
have
ended
here,
just
as
it
could
have
a
half
a
dozen
times
before,
and
again
half
a
dozen
times
after,
but
did
not.
It
was
ended
several
moths
later,
abruptly,
by
one
of
them
of
course,
as
all
affairs
must.
Tales
are
born
when
people
follow
a
different
path
than
is
usual
for
them
or
for
others.
Tales
are
told
for
a
rupee
or
a
kopek
but
lies
are
spun
in
the
ear
of
the
payer
when
tales
are
retold,
the
first
of
which
is
that
the
tale
is
true,
for
at
the
very
least
it
changes
every
time
it
is
heard
anew.
The
second
lie
is
that
the
listener
is
the
main
character,
for
in
truth
no
one
is
whisked
into
harems,
pirates
do
not
fall
in
love
and
there
is
no
perfect
lover.
But
these
are
little
lies,
lies
told
to
make
the
magic
seem
real,
if
only
for
a
little
while.
One
of
them
would
eventually
end
the
affair,
on
his
or
her
terms,
and
regardless
of
whom
it
would
be,
some
things
were
inevitable.
And
so
there
was
pain,
of
course,
but
a
very
small
price
to
pay
for
what
they
had
had
together,
nothing
more
than
the
pain
one
might
feel
at
turning
the
last
page
of
a
book
that
has
touched
one’s
soul,
which
one
might
think
would
not
be
enough
to
douse
any
desire
to
ever
read
again.
There
was
self-‐questioning
on
many
topics
of
the
future
and
the
past.
Had
the
affair
gone
on
would
they
eventually
have
met
and
had
passionate
sex?
That
surely
would
have
been
the
paroxysm
from
whose
descent
would
have
been
sown
a
different
ending.
In
time
all
evidence
would
eventually
be
effaced
and
no-‐one
would
ever
know
what
had
transpired,
and
that
was
just
as
should
be,
just
as
had
silently
never
been
promised…
But
before
proceeding
to
what
some
might
choose
to
see
as
an
homage
a
metaphor
is
in
order,
in
lieu
of
explanation.
Consider,
dear
reader,
that
a
violin
sonata
when
played
to
an
audience
of
one
will
have
three
endings
because
neither
the
pianist
nor
the
violinist
can
hear
what
the
listener
hears,
just
as
the
listener
cannot
feel
the
instruments
vibrating
against
her
skin,
under
his
fingers.
And
since
in
life
there
is
no
score,
how
could
two
lives
be
expected
to
tell
the
same
story?