Read Carnal Isræl: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture Online

Authors: Daniel Boyarin

Tags: #Religion, #Judaism, #General

Carnal Isræl: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture (165 page)

< previous page
page_57
next page >
Page 57
Palestine. Philo, after all, rails against those who maintained that the allegorical meaning had replaced the physical practice of the commandments, thus suggesting the existence of such groups, not altogether different from Pauline Christianity.
37
With the increasing threat to the corporeal integrity of the Jewish people from these platonizing tendencies within Judaism, which culminated in post-Pauline Christianity, the Rabbis more and more rejected dualistic understandings of the relation of body to soul. Such rejectionwhich the Fathers characterized as carnality became the very marker of the rabbinic formation. Increasing distance from both platonic dualism and Stoicism carried with it a logic that affirmed sexuality per se. That affirmation has been documented here. There was to be, however, a reversal of this historical tendency when Greek thought re-entered the center of Jewish cultural practice in the Middle Ages.
The Return of the Dual: Maimonides's Interpretation of Eve
The religion and culture of the medieval Jewish scholastics, with Maimonides at their head, is quite distinct from that of the Rabbis.
38
Maimonides's reading of the story of the creation of Adam and Eve introduces into the later rabbinic culture the very dualisms from which the midrashic Rabbis escaped in theirs. Maimonides
accepts and interprets
the common rabbinic understanding of the Creation of Eve narrative as the splitting off of two halves of an originally androgynous being. However, this story is no longer read literally as the creation of an androgynous
body
which is split off
physically
into two bodies, one male and one female; rather, it is thoroughly allegorized. Again, the content of this privileged founding allegory thematizes and justifies the very form of allegory.
39
37. This represents only one possibility of understanding Paul's position. It is, however, the interpretation that I find most compelling, as I shall argue in a forthcoming work.
38. I emphasize, "scholastics," because there were other opposing tendencies in medieval Judaism as well. In fact, in his day, Maimonides's philosophy was considered by manyif not mostJewish authorities as heretical. His allegorization of rabbinic myth and biblical anthropomorphisms of God were particularly opposed. Moreover, texts directly opposing his negative view of the body and sexuality were also produced at this time.
39. For much of what follows I am dependent on Klein-Braslavy (1986, 193 ff.).
 
< previous page
page_57
next page >
< previous page
page_58
next page >
Page 58
Maimonides justifies his move toward allegorical interpretation by citing an explicit example from Plato: "For they concealed what they said about the first principles and presented it in enigmas. Thus Plato . . . designated Matter as the female and Form as the male" (Maimonides 1963, 43; see Klein-Braslavy 1986, 198). This example, presented as if random and innocent, becomes in fact the
master
allegory of Maimonides's writing. The connection between matter and the female, according to Maimonides, lies in the fact that "woman" is a name for that which needs to be joined to something else, and matter, of course, in Platonic-Aristotelian physics, desires to be joined with a form. What is astounding here is how quickly Maimonides's ontology and its connected hermeneutic practice bring him to expressions of virulent misogyny, much more virulent, indeed, than any known in the older formation of midrashic Judaism:
How extraordinary is what
Solomon
said in his wisdom when likening matter
to a married harlot,
for matter is in no way found without form and is consequently always like a
married woman
who is never separated from a
man
and is never
free
. However, notwithstanding her being
a married woman,
she never ceases to seek for another man to substitute for her husband, and she deceives and draws him on in every way until he obtains from her what her husband used to obtain.
(Maimonides 1963, 431)
Maimonides's allegorization of "woman" and "man" as matter and form, and his physical philosophy of matter as always in need of form and always exchanging forms, essentializes woman (as the allegorized term) into an ontological whoredom. We typically refer to such allegory as
personification allegory
and forget that it is also a reification of persons. When those persons are not individual fictional characters but categories of real human beings, the social results can be dramaticindeed devastating. Maimonides continues his exposition of the relation of matter to form:
For example, man's apprehension of his Creator, his mental representation of every intelligible, his control of his desire and his anger . . . are all of them consequent upon his form. On the other hand, his eating and drinking and copulation and his passionate desire for these things, as well as his anger and all bad habits found in him, are all of them consequent on his matter. Inasmuch as it is clear that this is so, and as according to what has been laid down by divine wisdom it is impossible for matter to exist without form and for any of the forms in question to exist without matter, and as consequently it was necessary that man's
 
< previous page
page_58
next page >

Other books

Eight Christmas Eves by Curtis, Rachel
Punchline by Jacqueline Diamond
Secret Passions by Jill Sanders
The Thing Itself by Peter Guttridge
Crisis Four by Andy McNab
Autopilot by Andrew Smart